The Gaming Den

deaddmwalking wrote:

shadzar wrote: but it wasn't ettercaps fondling night hags with pixie parts in some spider orgy.

This is the only part of your post that I read. Based solely on this, I hope that's what Next delivers.

Are you kidding? This is going in my next campaign!

Heck, Giant Frog might just do it because Giant Frog. Seriously? There are still MC who are naive enough to believe a disruptive player saying "I am not Evil, I randomly attack people because I'm Chaotic"? Can I play with your group? ... or they might go there to feed the homeless. Or fee...

@Lord Mistborn:
I think that pretty much says it all.


Just to put things in to perspective about him -- he's 38, and supposedly has a Masters from Yale. Just sayin'.

I'd be curious to see the opinion of Zak S of http://dndwithpornstars.blogspot.com/ fame on this article as Zak S has also written entries about character creation rules such as here: http://dndwithpornstars.blogspot.com/2013/04/updated-character-generation-rules-now.html and I'd like to know what ...

Zak S wrote:

Kaelik wrote: False Premise, that I would want to have sex every night.

Wow, you really are boring.

Well, not everybody is a damaged, broken, loserwhore.

You have me confused with someone else. I don't care about whore or loser. It is Supergirl who cares about whore, and I could give a fuck about loser (is anyone really upset about loser?) I don't care about people saying mean things in general. I care about people saying wrong things, and I really ...

Yes, Kaelik can be a little belligerent at times -- I think everyone can agree on that. It's kinda what he does -- there would be something severely wrong if he wasn't. However, the "asshole scale" and "knows-their-shit scale" are completely and totally independent of each other....

can someone please fix their tags?

FrankTrollman wrote:But I would definitely say that something could be a form of currency without ultimately being usable for the payment of taxes.

-Username17

You've never been delinquent on your taxes, have you?


That being said .... seriously though, investment traders do it all the time.

Wait -- did I read that right?
Is he really such a simpleton (or maybe think that we're such simpletons) that he actually thought that "Social Currency" was literally part of the Turnip Exchange?

@fectin: Fair enough. I concede. [hr] @ Zak: I had this big giant omni-post set up ... and then I realized that I just don't care anymore. I know for fact that you're not actually pay attention; I know for fact that it will not provoke one single iota of new thought from you; and I know for a fact t...

Incorrect. This thing started with me seeing a trackback on my blog to someone getting my rules wrong and me politely correcting them: http://www.tgdmb.com/viewtopic.php?t=54808&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 …and then several people going apeshit for no reason. People when apeshit be...

EDIT: I actually still can't find this supposed Doyle letter, can you give me a post number? Here you go. EDIT2: I also blame his response to me: Oh look, another arbitrary challenge issued in bad faith. That is new. I mean, it's not like you did that twice already. When you say "in bad faith&...

@Kaelik: I think he's trying to say that a rpg.net member named "Doyle" wrote that, not him. However, I've theorized that if that is indeed the case, then either "Doyle" is a sock puppet account; or it's a real account, but it's one of his RL gaming buddies. Either way, it's fuck...

So, here's the deal ..... Whatever this "evidence" is, it doesn't matter -- because it's guaranteed to actually be neither provable nor disprovable; thus making this whole thing a farce. I know it; you know it; PL knows it; Kaelik knows it; hell, even yellow dog know it. But even if this h...

That's a really neat trick, that whole ignoring the substantive post. :bored: But to answer your question: internet gambling is against federal law -- so you just attempted to solicit me in to engaging in criminal activity. But if it were legal, I'd probably ante up with your liver, and be prepared ...

Zak S wrote: Luckily I don't even have to address this because someone else already did:

Judging by the grammar style and a few reoccurring phrases, I'm forced to conclude that this is the work of your sock puppet; albeit, a kinder, gentler approach than your usual display.



Whatever, jagoff.

A creature/object burns until it is out of hit points. That was stated in the original example. You see, hit points are a complete abstraction…. Wotmaniac hasn't explained why he's saying any of this or talking about it. Well, probably because of this, you dipshit: But when do they stop burning? Or...

Grek wrote:God damn it, stop quoting each other if you can't do the tags right.

I fixed right away. (well, +forum lag)
So sue me -- 1 single backslash in 3 years.

When I wanted to know the assumptions behind your oil rule I asked questions--I didn't assume you had a secret plot to hide how it works. Actually, that's explicitly what you did. Like, literally.: You can't generally throw them all in one round unless you set a trap. Super easy to do. Plus you can...

Zak -- fucking learn how to use tags!!!

1. It doesn't have to be realistic,it just has to work in a game If your game can't even pretend to be bothered with trying to have some sort of casual realism, then your game is categorically stupid, and you should feel bad about yourself for playing it. 2. Even if it was: you're basically arguing...

This algorithm assumes a stupifyingly simplistic of human motivation and behavior. I've never killed anyone in my entire life -- it just something I don't do. I find such behavior to be unacceptable and abhorrent. My personality and/or alignment simply does not allow for that kind of activity. Howev...

A creature/object burns until it is out of hit points. That was stated in the original example. You see, hit points are a complete abstraction. When I stab you until all your hit points fall out (mechanically speaking), then (narratively speaking) I've caused significant blood loss and/or vital orga...

He's saying that you seem to see everything through the prism of AW; even going out of your way to actively look of correlations between AW and every other game. And the fact that you did indeed do that here, it looks like you are intentionally mocking yourself; but you're not because you're being g...