The Gaming Den

He's not talking about the aborted fetus at all in that post.

Right-O!

More versions of the Half-Dragon Class? Perhaps one that gives bard-casting, or one that gives size increases. Oh wait, I know, Dragons are just Kobolds that took levels in Half Dragon, Fiendish Brute, and some bull Kobold only prestige class that gives catch-up casting like Beholder Mage or Ur-Prie...

MrWaesel, you've really got to stop giving me such good setups with which to insult Crissa, I only have so much will power; sooner or later I'll end up getting banned.[br][br]Though I suppose you'll reply with something along the lines of "NOW WOULDN'T THAT BE A SHAME.", or possibly ignore...

I support the idea of Kobolds as Energy Mages, assuming you mean Fire Mage and whatnot, based on their draconic patron's type.

Yes.

Fuzzy Dice.

Alignement=Evil/Good/Law/Chaos when refering to protection from, magic circle against, or detect.

Another alternative is something like Fate points you can spend to ignore an effect that would kill or disable you. Feel free to give them out on a per day, per encounter or per level basis.[br][br]It isn't hard to make SoD's be less immediate, you just have to be willing to actually make SoD'd be l...

I'm a new DM, should I allow a warlock or soul-knife?

Malacor_Wraith wrote:I'm co-DMing a campaign with a friend (mostly because I know the math for 3.5 better than anyone else in our group

I think his friends were being sarcastic when they told him this.

Draco_Argentum at [unixtime wrote:1196652689[/unixtime]]Trying to get longer fights with SoDs is more work.

Status tracks you need to get pushed down instead of genuine SoDs right off the bat.

Man I've really got to work on that Generic D&D re-write Ckafrica and I, and others, were brainstorming on.

That would be awesome. Next they can ban the term "CoDzilla".

Does he understand that those feats have delayed progression for non-fighter types?

I've made my case and explained that I don't even actually disagree with you guys. I'm done with this thread until it changes topics.

Funny, connoisseur isn't the word I would have used.

I think they're all NPCs.

1196543409[/unixtime]]easily offended and the internet are not compatible. If a stick is seriously shoved that far up their ***, then there is not much help for them.[br][br]I personally try to be polite and keep profanity to a minimum, but if someone cannot cope with vulgarity then they have a pro...

I thought I'd have a good chance of finding a girl that would be interested in starting a relationship with me this semester, but it turns out all the girls in my class, and there is only one other guy in the class, are married, twice my age+, or severely annoying.[br][br]I think I'll give E-Harmony...

I took that test and got a 1%.

I'd probably do that, but I didn't write the rule, I'm just defending it as a perfectly functional alternative to taking every single item on a case for case basis.

Your role model is Maddox? That's both lame and completely contrary to how you conduct yourself around here.

Hey, wait a minute. It looks like that, as written, Rage Dice don't get added to Whirlwind granted attacks since they aren't granted by your BaB. That sucks and isn't what the Rage Dice restriction was meant to stop in the first place. Am I missing something here? Please tell me I am.

...what?[br][br]Anyway I'm in favor of this rule because it, A, mildly dissuades players from making really stupid items, but, B, still allows a DM to keep iconic items and non-standard items balanced via treasure or trading. So if the DM could allow you to find that ring on True Seeing, because sai...

Well, hey, good luck with that.

You seriously have to do this. It'll be awesome.