And for the fuckwit:
This fire feeds on your failure. Bring it bitch. Or you can STFU and we can go back to discussing the interactions between your face and penises.
-- put the wall of images behind a spoiler tag. --Z
[The Great Fence Builder Speaks]
Images removed.
[/TGFBS]
Search found 296 matches
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:01 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:58 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
You really want to go there with me? Fine. That means two casters and a bunch of mooks. In the absence of further information, simply load standard defenses, standard offenses, standard countermeasures, take out the actual threats first and boom done. Since it's a list of threats, and only a third o...
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:52 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: De canistro textrinum
- Replies: 983
- Views: 83020
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:30 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
Oh, you want to multi spam me with post rewrites? We can do this dance. http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/nexus123/nexus1231201/nexus123120100085/12193415-fire-basket.jpg http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/nexus123/nexus1231201/nexus123120100085/12193415-fire-basket.jpg http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/...
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:26 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: De canistro textrinum
- Replies: 983
- Views: 83020
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:53 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: De canistro textrinum
- Replies: 983
- Views: 83020
I think most characters that don't fail the SGT would not have problems with ECL+1 or ECL+2 encounters in parties of 4 (they probably can't take them more than once per day without having a chance of dying). In addition not all encounters are created equal often DMs pad out encounters with low opti...
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:48 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
I'm a bit curious as to how Mr.GC would build a party to couner the following threat. A witch A winged fighter An artificer An alchemist A minion An evil ranger and his companion Step 1: Acquire a flame thrower. Step 2: Acquire your target. Step 3: After burning the Pathfinder books to ashes, play ...
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:20 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
herp derp I want to suck GC cock but I'm tsundere for him so I'm going to insult him in a 3rd grade fashion by rewriting his posts fixed. That was actually mildly entertaining, but you solve gimp poster problems the same way you solve gimp player problems. Disregard their existence, watch as they g...
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:18 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: De canistro textrinum
- Replies: 983
- Views: 83020
At this point it may be wise to admit that the CR guidelines get incoherent if you apply them the way you doing. They say ECL+4 encounters have a 50% chance of killing the party and that you face around one of them every level. The CR system assumes that the party can face 4 CR=ECL encounters a day...
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 3:08 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 3:03 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: De canistro textrinum
- Replies: 983
- Views: 83020
Actually, I suck cock and like to bite, and this is where most of the basket weaver rage comes in. Because see, that ignores the part of the game where a significant portion of encounters have me flip the table in self-righteous disgust, and end up higher than you because of all the drugs. So if yo...
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 2:16 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: De canistro textrinum
- Replies: 983
- Views: 83020
Because Frank and K have never created powerful characters. Alternately, you might be a moronic jackass. That just makes their fall into basket weaverism all the more offensive. How the fuck do you go from something like this, that makes even optimizers go and act like basket weavers, to saying shi...
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:51 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
For fuck's sake: he's talking about masterwork tools for Truespeaking. Those things don't exist. There can't be a masterwork tool for a skill that doesn't use tools. You can't apply the masterwork property to something that never existed in the first place. For fuck's sake: he's sperging about a +2...
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:32 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
Notice it has Mindsight? What does Mindsight require? What does it not have naturally? Now go look at the Truenamer utterances. You should be able to work it all out easily, even if these losers cannot. And actually no kicking took place. You asked her to join then drug your feet about it for a whi...
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 1:27 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: De canistro textrinum
- Replies: 983
- Views: 83020
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:23 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: De canistro textrinum
- Replies: 983
- Views: 83020
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 12:05 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: De canistro textrinum
- Replies: 983
- Views: 83020
Re: De canistro textrinum
So I ignored this thread because it was as stupid as the poorly spelled title would lead me to believe. And then it suddenly grew a few dozen posts. So ok, we can play this game. Listen nineball if your party dies to all the monsters than you're going to have a hard time playing a game largely about...
- Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:48 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
- Mon Oct 15, 2012 6:57 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
Not my game. Also the shadow demon is stronger than that. You got the Truespeak number exactly right though. I prepared the character for your game then you kicked me out due to internet drama. Wait wat you said that item familiars were banned when I asked about them. I don't suppose you mind posti...
- Mon Oct 15, 2012 6:46 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
- Mon Oct 15, 2012 6:17 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
I'm guessing that the numbers of GC's monsters are inflated by them universally having access to stuff like Law Devotion. Once again I'd really like to see some full statblocks from GC. I've been known to crank out some optimized mobs in my time but his numbers still look above and beyond the stand...
- Mon Oct 15, 2012 5:59 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
Herpaderp. That is not a proper CR 7 monster. Herpaderp. Sure it is. It's a basic monster with a few class levels added. I didn't even abuse nonassociated rules. It's also partially nullified by flight, only doing +24/+24/+19 for 1d8+18 each at range. Yes, it'd slaughter gimps all day but what's wr...
- Mon Oct 15, 2012 3:44 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
Yes, because those orcs really aren't trying to kill your character. Oh wait, they totally are, and you are herp de derp hurr durr . Except you don't even follow the damn rules. You essentially never have a CR 9 monster actually use the stats of a roc, or a CR 7 use the numbers of a dire bear; thei...
- Mon Oct 15, 2012 2:13 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577
- Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:10 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: You do fucking win at D&D.
- Replies: 735
- Views: 92577