The Gaming Den

Can you be amoral when you care for your species' survival?

What the fuck's "amoral" supposed to mean, anyway?

Attacking with a gauntlet is considered an unarmed attack. That much is perfectly true.

We are Yuan-ti with poisoned arrows in quiver. When we die, we might drop butterknives.

One thing is clear: a gauntlet attack is not a weapon attack because it specifically mentions it being an unarmed attack. I think the whole debate depends on if you insist on the table or not. If you don't then monk unarmed strike damage obviously counts when using a gauntlet. But who the fuck cares...

Giving out racial stuff per level automatically leads to right and wrong choices regarding race. If you want that, ok, but mostly it's just bad design if you punish players for not playing a dwarven cleric. If you do that you could just simply be honest about it, tone down the complexity and restric...

Or he is simply on coke, which of course doesn't rule out narcissism but could explain his behaviour on its own.

I go back to my original point. Hard things in D&D should just have a high AC and appropriate energy resists and immunities. It's the best option the system's got. That results in a wall that anyone can take down with any weapon that can deal lethal damage given enough time. Sorry, but you just...

http://www.faqs.org/health/topics/92/Narcissism.html Narcissistic personality disorder has also been linked to anorexia nervosa, substance-related disorders (especially cocaine abuse), and other personality disorders. http://focus.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleID=1686650 Alcohol, benzodia...

fectin wrote:What's the likelihood of Silva dropping in to this thread?

Silva teaming up with the one who must not be named?

Worst thread ever. A guy who must not be named on coke is trolling a bunch of geeks who seriously don't have anything better to do than set a guy who must not be named on coke, who is trolling them, straight again and again and again. Really? It strikes me more as someone desperate to validate hims...

Ancient History wrote:Honestly, it happened this way last time. Which is what I warned him about, in private, before he started calling people names. I'm sort of amazed it's happening again, but if nothing else Zak is stubborn.

This thread is worse because it is happening again.

Worst thread ever.

A guy who must not be named on coke is trolling a bunch of geeks who seriously don't have anything better to do than set a guy who must not be named on coke, who is trolling them, straight again and again and again.

You guys are getting trolled by the one who must not be named, again.

PhoneLobster wrote:It looks like he has now managed to restrain himself to something as minor as one "nuh ah, you are poopy heads!" per page of thread, but last time it was still reams of gibbering self contradictory insanity and it could still happen again.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0TPPmFU4VA

For most people I would assume that's what he meant - "You design D&D to be a game people will want to play, including any kind of minority. You don't try to design a game specifically for a minority, that is nearly always bad and either patronising or offensive. Hi, video game industry!&q...

Did shadzar just get his stupid ass banned? Tbh, I don't think that shadzar meant his comment in a racist way. He meant to say that he doesn't want a rpg designed for a special group of people, like in "this rpg is designed for bi-sexual midgets". I honestly don't think that shadzar has a...

Thread done.

The reason behind my disagreement with you is because this isn't D&D or Ars Magica, this is a White Wolf game. And White Wolf games are noted for two conceits that need to be properly understood before one is permitted to discuss them. Attempting to discuss them without understanding said conce...

virgil wrote:Are you retarded?

Are you seriously asking shadzar this question?

The same should be true of the Rogue. The fact that a Rogue can pick a lock shouldn't mean that an Assassin can't . The fact that a Rogue can pick someone's pocket shouldn't mean that an Illusionist can't . The fact that a Rogue can hide in shadows shouldn't mean that a Hero can't . But they should...

http://seankreynolds.wordpress.com/2014/06/04/ex-su-and-martial-characters/ By getting rid of the idea that you have to define special abilities as either “magic” or “not magic,” you also get rid of the idea that “martial characters don’t have magic, and therefore can’t do amazing things because the...

shadzar wrote:maybe you should both learn to speak Engrish.

Hiralious.