The Gaming Den

It is gibberish. It's also fail-explaining gibberish, which makes it twice as bad.

Signing up with evil side in, for example, Warhammer (any variant) or just about any of the White Wolf games is pointless at best, but usually delusional and self-destructive (although recruiting agents of the resident evils often won't tell you that or they are deluded themselves). However, these ...

This is Mike Mearls we're talking about here. He's genetically predisposed to making classes which fail. Epically.

Words fail me.

Actually in D&D no armor at all (Bracers of Armor) ends up better than any suit of armor. Of course by the time you reach that point the game is so fucking broken no one cares, but the bar for effective armor progressively moves towards none at all with every level. As a lover of epic levels, t...

I would like to echo Kaelik, but go further: position 1 is STUPID. It isn't interesting, fun or cool, it's DUMB. If you claim that a full quarter of your cosmology is delusional, your setting sucks and I don't wanna play in your games. If you are to make Good, Evil or whatever else COSMIC forces, yo...

I suspect Frank was being sarcastic. Lack of tone in a text-only medium makes it harder to understand, though.

Bigode wrote:Isn't that actually way overpowered at low levels?

Isn't this guy a serious troll?

These were designed for a Shadow Warrior PC, which is why I made them [Combat] feats. Although you are probably right in that they should be [Monstrous] feats.

Sounds like a dagger gish to me.

Wow... these are a hell-load more powerful. How do they balance with other [Combat] feats? Not criticising, just curious.

"How Things Ought to Be" sounds pretty good.

True, but then again, it is in everyone's best interests to give this a cool name. Hence, suggestions.

Deathly Blade. Blade of Death. Silent Death Swordsman. Silent Death Bladesman.

Take your pick.

Tracing Iameki is something I can attempt, but I'm not exactly on a first-name basis with most of this place, so I may be the wrong one to ask.

As for pattern recognition and C/P, that I can do reasonably well.

Near as I can see, nothing missed. Good job!

I sketched these at the request of one of my players, who wanted a better version of INA. Deciding that INA was flavourless, I wrote these two feats instead: Rending Claws [Combat] Your claws fvcking cut people in fvcking half. +0: Your claws are considered one size category larger for the purpose o...

I would be willing to pitch in however possible, but I cannot help with the LaTeX issues.

EDIT: Here and here have a lot of feats which should be included, in my humble opinion. Especially the skill feats. If you've already noticed this, Aktariel, sorry, but just reminding ya.

I'm with you on this one, Aktariel, for exactly the same reasons. But is there any reason why you can't rename one and include both?

Tome of Awesome? Oh yeah! EDIT: Am I blind, or are the spheres that the curator is meant to take not in there? EDIT 2: Unorthodox Fighter feat has some formatting issues. Also, [Combat] feats are all labelled with square-bracketed subtypes. EDIT 3: The Drunken Master text is missing Drink Like Two D...

This is why we love you, Aktariel.

*Motions for this to be included, if Aktariel isn't dying yet.*

Love it. I wish Make Like a Tree came earlier, however. Any reason that you thought that it was a level 13 ability? I kind of see the "Instant tree, just add water and wait 1 hour" as a low level ability (the ability to grow apple trees for dinner). I am totally playing one of these in my...

Less argument is always better - I was merely interested in understanding why you took the issue so personally.

Nothing much, except for RAI. I just said that's how I'd rule the spell to work, and then Kaelik went and shat himself in the thread because I'm trying to annihilate rogues and prevent them from sneak attacking. Well, I'm not precisely sure what you aim to achieve with this. What precise benefit is...

Psychic Robot wrote:Except I have never once said it was broken.

Then pray, sir, bequeath upon this most humble servant the precise nature of thy problem?