The Gaming Den

In fact, I remember CharOp coming out with a chart of the strongest classes in 3.5 that went: wizard, archivist, artificer, druid, cleric, psion, sorcerer, erudite, beguiler, wu jen, spirit shaman, favored soul, dread necromancer, ardent, warblade, crusader, swordsage, wilder, shugenja, dragonfire ...

The Barbarian Multiclass is as you noted daily. In general 4e makes daily powers stronger. Obviously, daily should be stronger. But should one feat be outright better than another? Eventually feats are going to be right out better. However, if your not a Strength based character, and are, say Dex i...

Because trying to have intelligent discourse means I'm trying to apologize for 4e? Apologetics does not mean what you think it means. Admittedly it's connotation has been ruined by association with religious retards. apologetic - Having the character of apology; regretfully excusing; Defending by w...

This forum is filled with people who play high power games of D&D that work and work well. Not really. By "work". you mean having a piles of house rules to make the game not completely implode, and another pile of house rules to allow classes other than primary spellcasters to not tot...

1. Fragile system: play like the devs or break the game. - This was true in 3.5, now while it is still to a degree true, its much less so. In 3.5, if you wanted a balanced game, you literally had to play either classes of Tier 3 or below, or played like WoTC, IE: Tank Fighter, Healing Cleric, Skill...

I found a link to here over from the GiantITP forums, and I find some things your citing as problems don't actually exist as a problem. I'm going to frame my answers in the context of 3.5 precisely because that is the system that seems most familiar to the forum over all. 1. Fragile system: play lik...