Really? Where? Maybe you're confusing me with someone else since you can't see over Frank Trollman's potbelly from where you're surgically attached to his prick.Roy wrote:You have been caught in at least one lie already.
Search found 17 matches
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:59 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 2:58 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:18 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
Therefore combat maneuvers now are not worth taking - not only the chance of success is not great That actually varies. They severely nerfed sized bonuses (and penalties), so for example where a level 3 fighter with 18 strength would have to roll d20+7 vs a standard ogre's d20+12 (average 22.5) in ...
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:30 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
snip In other words, what you're saying is that a core rules fighter sucks compared to a fully optimized fighter using bits and pieces from every splat book known to man, and because of that, Pathfinder sucks. Gotcha. @Zurai: When Pathfinder comes on the shelves I will give my opinion on it and tha...
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:50 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
If you have to go back and grab an older class in order to get any improvement at all, you aren't getting what you paid for. Where is this coming from? Stupid as the rounds-per-day thing is, the Bard is in all other ways much improved. They lost no other functionality (well, I suppose you could say...
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:25 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
I seriously doubt they'll tell us how many were in the first print run. They refused to even tell us how many people bought Rise of the Runelords, beyond saying that it was way more successful than they projected. I'd guess roughly 25,000 to 50,000, based on the beta download numbers, but that's pur...
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 5:12 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
The fact that by completely ignoring all the bardic shit that Pathfinder offers you can go make a 3.5 character doesn't make Pathfinder better. It makes it a lying bitch trying to convince people to buy a book they won't even want to use once they have it. You don't have to ignore Paizo's bard chan...
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:42 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:20 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
Perhaps Josh's confusion came from that Seekers of the Song are better off drowning themselves in order to lose a level and choose another prestige class next time? Could be. Like I said, I wasn't recommending the class. Just pointing out that the bardic prestige classes are hardly removed as an op...
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:11 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:07 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
WTF, dungeonscape? I don't know anyone who even owns that book, hell, I barely heard about its existence. It came out Feb 2007. That had to be one of the last 3.5e products kicked out the door. And that is the new bar by what fighters are to be measured? Sweet Jesus. Dungeon Crasher has obscene dam...
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:53 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
Seeker of the Song?! You're seriously suggesting that there is anything useful in the class about underwater singing!? SO what was that theorized cheese in Combine Songs that makes level 2 worth actually taking compared to just straight bard? We must be talking about different classes. Seeker of th...
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:37 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
Lying? Seriously, it looks like this: Frank: Pathfinder does X. X is self-evidently bad, so Pathfinder is therefore bad. Zurai: Nuh-uh! That's the beta, (ed. note: which they've already sold ). The designers promised that the release version (not the one they already fucking sold ) would be good, s...
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:29 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
But didn't you say that 3.5 sourcebooks don't count previously? So if dungeonscape is out of play, doesn't that make the primary damage engine power attack? I am confused. No. I said that the Golarion Gods and Magic book is not a Pathfinder RPG sourcebook and has no Pathfinder RPG rules in it, so s...
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:21 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
Actually it appears a handwave dismissal is all he needs . He claims fighters are stronger yet admits their major damage engine has been nerfed... just not as badly as they originally screwed em over. Power Attack hasn't been the primary Fighter damage engine since Dungeonscape was released. Nor di...
- Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:31 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
- Mon Aug 03, 2009 10:45 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
- Replies: 1819
- Views: 420207
Re: Pathfinder: the Lowdown
Wow, there's a lot of useless, vitriolic dreck in the OP, much of which is out-and-out false. No. In this case, the "playtest" was a lie. Destructive playtesting was not only not encouraged, it was actively and specifically rejected. The Paizo leadership only wanted to hear about whether p...