How much, how far do you trust your DM?
Moderator: Moderators
How much, how far do you trust your DM?
With the recent threads where the DM's role is at least tangentially covered I am wondering how much, how far you trust your DM. Not as much about whether or not the DM rolls fairly, and uses the rules, but whether or not you trust the DM to provide a fun game. If the game is fun do you care about how the DM does it?
Which one?
My first (D&D) one, no (but he isnt my DM any longer).
(He keept changing the rules...)
My SR one: far
My current D&D, not so far.
(Isnt very rules wise, and is likely to allow broken stuff if presented right.
At the same time, he doesnt allow non-broken stuff, because he thinks its overpowered.)
But he learns...
My first (D&D) one, no (but he isnt my DM any longer).
(He keept changing the rules...)
My SR one: far
My current D&D, not so far.
(Isnt very rules wise, and is likely to allow broken stuff if presented right.
At the same time, he doesnt allow non-broken stuff, because he thinks its overpowered.)
But he learns...
- JonSetanta
- King
- Posts: 5525
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: interbutts
Trust a DM? Oh lawdy..
There's three dilemma: the Rotating DM, the Gygaxian DM, and me.
Rotating DM
Strong trust is needed. Each time your volunteering switches DM role to you, it's your duty to not only put aside your PC by story means, but to not dish yourself items "for when my character returns".
Each session is like a kid's cartoon; intro, conflict, progress, and resolution all within a single day.
No hanging endings, those are wrapped up by the next DM.
No continued plotline unless the next DM wishes to; don't guarantee you're going to be the next DM, things always happen to stall plans.
No permanent alterations to culture or landscape without vote by the group. You also can't filibuster this.
Gygaxian DM
Fucking dickwads.
No, I don't want to argue about how your autopass crits and fumbles ruin martial combat.
No, I don't want to start a new campaign every time we reach level 3.
No, I didn't want my tiefling to get dildo-raped in the ass by a demigod.
Buy me dinner first or something.
Rocks fall, everyone dies.
... Except the DM's girlfriend because there won't be any sex that week if her rogue is damaged.
Me
I trust myself completely. It's those shifty munchkins and crit-sneaks I keep an eye on!
There's three dilemma: the Rotating DM, the Gygaxian DM, and me.
Rotating DM
Strong trust is needed. Each time your volunteering switches DM role to you, it's your duty to not only put aside your PC by story means, but to not dish yourself items "for when my character returns".
Each session is like a kid's cartoon; intro, conflict, progress, and resolution all within a single day.
No hanging endings, those are wrapped up by the next DM.
No continued plotline unless the next DM wishes to; don't guarantee you're going to be the next DM, things always happen to stall plans.
No permanent alterations to culture or landscape without vote by the group. You also can't filibuster this.
Gygaxian DM
Fucking dickwads.
No, I don't want to argue about how your autopass crits and fumbles ruin martial combat.
No, I don't want to start a new campaign every time we reach level 3.
No, I didn't want my tiefling to get dildo-raped in the ass by a demigod.
Buy me dinner first or something.
Rocks fall, everyone dies.
... Except the DM's girlfriend because there won't be any sex that week if her rogue is damaged.
Me
I trust myself completely. It's those shifty munchkins and crit-sneaks I keep an eye on!
- NineInchNall
- Duke
- Posts: 1222
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
The word is trilemma.
First DM, from middle school, high school, and college: Absolutely.
Second DM: I trust myself.
Current DM: Far enough.
First DM, from middle school, high school, and college: Absolutely.
Second DM: I trust myself.
Current DM: Far enough.
Last edited by NineInchNall on Thu Jul 16, 2009 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Current pet peeves:
Misuse of "per se". It means "[in] itself", not "precisely". Learn English.
Malformed singular possessives. It's almost always supposed to be 's.
Misuse of "per se". It means "[in] itself", not "precisely". Learn English.
Malformed singular possessives. It's almost always supposed to be 's.
- Count Arioch the 28th
- King
- Posts: 6172
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Judging__Eagle
- Prince
- Posts: 4671
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada
Hmmm.....
Honestly, there's really only one GM that I know right now that I trust to run a fun game.
All of my previous ones were either bad, or novices.
Honestly, there's really only one GM that I know right now that I trust to run a fun game.
All of my previous ones were either bad, or novices.
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.
While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
Wouldn't trust all but one, my second DM knew his shit very well and was quite creative. The only problem was he staunchly believed that the Core was completely balanced among itself. I'm talking like the PHBII Knight was too much high power for him.
This was probably for the best, as we all were douchebags and would look for any opportunity to upend the game for our own benefit.
This was probably for the best, as we all were douchebags and would look for any opportunity to upend the game for our own benefit.
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
So Wizards were perfectly ok eh?Mask_De_H wrote:Wouldn't trust all but one, my second DM knew his shit very well and was quite creative. The only problem was he staunchly believed that the Core was completely balanced among itself. I'm talking like the PHBII Knight was too much high power for him.
This was probably for the best, as we all were douchebags and would look for any opportunity to upend the game for our own benefit.
Draco_Argentum wrote:Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
- Psychic Robot
- Prince
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm
And druids. Though I'm not sure why anyone wouldn't trust his DM--and if one felt like one couldn't trust said DM, why anyone would spend time with that DM. Sounds like an un-fun game to me.
If trust were rated on a numeric scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the trust level you would give to a backstabbing, power-tripping twat and 10 being the trust level you would give to yourself, I'd say that my current DM is an 8.
If trust were rated on a numeric scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the trust level you would give to a backstabbing, power-tripping twat and 10 being the trust level you would give to yourself, I'd say that my current DM is an 8.
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:You do not seem to do anything.Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?