I want to get my rage on.

Red Archon · Post by **Red Archon** » Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:52 pm

I... don't think we need that.

Roy · Post by **Roy** » Wed Nov 11, 2009 6:15 pm

God_of_Awesome wrote:Okay, if you guys are too pussy to post furry porn, I will delves into several hundred sites I know off the top of my head and get some for you.

The only reason I'm not doing it is because it would tick that fence builder guy off. And I don't want to deal with that.

Because finding furry porn is totally easy. And if anything it's harder to find furry porn that aren't raep.

At least we're getting plenty of rage just talking about it.

Oh, I know how to get some rage.

I have furry porn on speed dial, bitches.

*waits for it*

CatharzGodfoot · Post by **CatharzGodfoot** » Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:19 pm

Roy wrote:
God_of_Awesome wrote:Okay, if you guys are too pussy to post furry porn, I will delves into several hundred sites I know off the top of my head and get some for you.
The only reason I'm not doing it is because it would tick that fence builder guy off. And I don't want to deal with that.

Because finding furry porn is totally easy. And if anything it's harder to find furry porn that aren't raep.

At least we're getting plenty of rage just talking about it.

Oh, I know how to get some rage.

I have furry porn on speed dial, bitches.

*waits for it*

Waits for what? This?

God_of_Awesome · Post by **God_of_Awesome** » Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:30 pm

Or this?

Yeah, I know it's not porn...

Edit: Still not porn, but now it's horrifying. YAY

TOZ · Post by **TOZ** » Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:35 pm

Roy · Post by **Roy** » Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:03 pm

I don't see any rage yet.

Mask_De_H · Post by **Mask_De_H** » Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:42 pm

Roy wrote:I don't see any rage yet.

FFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

Roy · Post by **Roy** » Wed Nov 11, 2009 10:48 pm

That worked out better than I intended.

God_of_Awesome · Post by **God_of_Awesome** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:51 am

Roy wrote:I don't see any rage yet.

I get the impression people dislike TVTropes? Why? It is less offensive the Wikipedia which is pretty damn inoffensive as it is.

Mask_De_H · Post by **Mask_De_H** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:15 am

God_of_Awesome wrote:
Roy wrote:I don't see any rage yet.

I get the impression people dislike TVTropes? Why? It is less offensive the Wikipedia which is pretty damn inoffensive as it is.

TVTropes is awesome, it's just a horrible timesink, worse than Wiki. Men have lost lives trawling the expanses of TVTropes.

And I remember someone saying something about carebear nerdwank bullshit in MPSIMS, but since that's the /b/ of TGD, I don't know if that's valid or not.

Lago PARANOIA · Post by **Lago PARANOIA** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:22 am

And I remember someone saying something about carebear nerdwank bullshit in MPSIMS, but since that's the /b/ of TGD, I don't know if that's valid or not.

First of all, screw you for the /b/ comment. The stuff there is no worse than what you would find on the Straight Dope Message Board.

Sonic the Hedgehog 2006 is a bad game. The fact that you can't say Sonic the Hedgehog 2006 is a bad game (despite there being several pages devoted to the badness of video games) because some Sonic fanboys get upset when you do this is why I call it a waste of time. Not just in the sense that it kills time, but because the wiki uselessly and arbitrarily sugarcoats certain topics out of a sense of not wanting to lose their hugbox.

shadzar · Post by **shadzar** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:31 am

"/b/"?

Leress · Post by **Leress** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:38 am

shadzar wrote:"/b/"?

4chan's "random" board.

shadzar · Post by **shadzar** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 3:42 am

Danke.

MGuy · Post by **MGuy** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:27 am

Lago PARANOIA wrote:
And I remember someone saying something about carebear nerdwank bullshit in MPSIMS, but since that's the /b/ of TGD, I don't know if that's valid or not.
First of all, screw you for the /b/ comment. The stuff there is no worse than what you would find on the Straight Dope Message Board.

Sonic the Hedgehog 2006 is a bad game. The fact that you can't say Sonic the Hedgehog 2006 is a bad game (despite there being several pages devoted to the badness of video games) because some Sonic fanboys get upset when you do this is why I call it a waste of time. Not just in the sense that it kills time, but because the wiki uselessly and arbitrarily sugarcoats certain topics out of a sense of not wanting to lose their hugbox.

Who defends Sonic nowadays? I'm a Sonic (nostalgia was one of my first games) fan and will freely tell anyone who asks that the games are shit. They had an excuse on earlier consoles not now. /rant

Lago PARANOIA · Post by **Lago PARANOIA** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:38 am

There are good Sonic games, they just don't happen to be produced by Sonic Team.

Draco_Argentum · Post by **Draco_Argentum** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 8:57 am

Roy wrote:Because finding furry porn is totally easy. And if anything it's harder to find furry porn that aren't raep.

Pssh, if theres a type of furry porn you have trouble finding you have really odd tastes.

Roy · Post by **Roy** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 11:55 am

God_of_Awesome wrote:
Roy wrote:I don't see any rage yet.

I get the impression people dislike TVTropes? Why? It is less offensive the Wikipedia which is pretty damn inoffensive as it is.

According to the other posts, it's precisely because it is inoffensive.

But that went better than planned, because that was supposed to be a picture of Vader force choking someone, aka 'You have failed me for the last time'. But TVTropes doesn't like hotlinking, so instead I just linked everyone there - and wasting several hours is certainly a rage inducing activity.

Draco_Argentum wrote:
Roy wrote:Because finding furry porn is totally easy. And if anything it's harder to find furry porn that aren't raep.
Pssh, if theres a type of furry porn you have trouble finding you have really odd tastes.

The normal kind is extremely hard to find. No really. Anything rare or essentially random is all over the place. Want something mundane, but with humanoid animals? Forget about it. They have to sneak attack you with something (else) weird.

*uses aid another on his own rage inducing*

God_of_Awesome · Post by **God_of_Awesome** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:56 pm

Roy wrote: The normal kind is extremely hard to find. No really. Anything rare or essentially random is all over the place. Want something mundane, but with humanoid animals? Forget about it. They have to sneak attack you with something (else) weird.

*uses aid another on his own rage inducing*

I can easily find some of that. e621 is one of those image sites that let's you sort through my category and it's a furry porn site.

And how did we get on this subject?

Roy · Post by **Roy** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:02 pm

Blame Lago, and his mention of underaged furries in an Exalted book. Which is certainly rage inducing. I ran with the idea, except using adult furries, because I don't find underaged anything attractive, however continuing to build rage is on topic.

In other words, I can tick everyone else off for my own amusement.*

* - Unless there are others here who actually like furry porn, then they can laugh along with me.

God_of_Awesome · Post by **God_of_Awesome** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:05 pm

Real children are nothing like loli porn. They are pudgy fat ugly things. So yeah, preadolescent girls are unnattractive.

Roy · Post by **Roy** » Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:06 pm

Ok now, I think that's a bit too much rage.

God_of_Awesome · Post by **God_of_Awesome** » Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:26 am

Roy wrote:Ok now, I think that's a bit too much rage.

Psychic Robot · Post by **Psychic Robot** » Fri Nov 13, 2009 7:18 am

This thread might be better off not existing.

TOZ · Post by **TOZ** » Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:30 pm

Oh yeah? Well YOU might be better off not existing!