![Sick :P](./images/smilies/sick.gif)
VaeVictis, a Dom3 MP
Moderator: Moderators
- angelfromanotherpin
- Overlord
- Posts: 9745
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
The status reports paint a very poor picture of Ermor's status in this game. I can't make any promises without more information on pretender design, scales, current research, holdings, resourcess, heroes and army set up. I will not have access to the history of the last 50 turns. I have no idea of the strategic goals of Ermor to this point and I have less of a clue as to the success of the implementation of those goals.
I'm certainly not going to let people walk all over me without putting up a fight, but I'm not going to pretend that I'll be doing anything other than providing a live target for other players.
Put another way, I doubt you would be needing a sub if Ermor had a chance in hell of influencing the outcome of this game. Still, I'm happy to step in if desired. Even if that means I get curbstomped on turn 53...
I'm certainly not going to let people walk all over me without putting up a fight, but I'm not going to pretend that I'll be doing anything other than providing a live target for other players.
Put another way, I doubt you would be needing a sub if Ermor had a chance in hell of influencing the outcome of this game. Still, I'm happy to step in if desired. Even if that means I get curbstomped on turn 53...
- angelfromanotherpin
- Overlord
- Posts: 9745
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- angelfromanotherpin
- Overlord
- Posts: 9745
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Pangaea has taken the fight to Marignon and injected an expeditionary force deep into their, umm, hinterlands. Apparently Marignon had a similar idea and has done the same to Ermor.
We exhort all right-minded nations to give up their stance of appeasement and let themselves be cowed no longer by angelic bullying.
We exhort all right-minded nations to give up their stance of appeasement and let themselves be cowed no longer by angelic bullying.
the toys go winding down.
- Primus
- Primus
-
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 29894
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Always the optimist, aren't you?FrankTrollman wrote: So you're probably going to be held at arm's length for some time while we deal with the Pangaea menace.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/smileyellow.gif)
Looking at your gem income, you're probably right. Looking at your bless, there is probably a nice stack of clams piled up on top of that. Still, nothing worse than not trying. Allies!
the toys go winding down.
- Primus
- Primus
-
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
On the minus side, they may very well cease to exist before then.FrankTrollman wrote:So you're probably going to be held at arm's length for some time while we deal with the Pangaea menace.
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:I'm not going to go full-asshole, but I'm turning up the dial about 50 millikaeliks.
Haven't looked at the turn yet, but...
Again, C'Tis reiterates its neutrality in all ongoing conflicts.
That being said, do not confuse C'Tis's position of neutrality with either appeasement or weakness. We will trade with anyone, and will demand a fair price. And if anyone attempts to invade us, we will fight back. Our armies may be puny, but our tech is very good.
So I would strongly suggest that the major powers turn elsewhere if they want a war, as fighting us would only result in long, bloody sieges that could prove to be a fatal distraction when fighting the real superpowers in this game.
I'm also going to point out that now is a fine time for C'Tis to also attack Ermor since they seem to be under attack from both Abysia and Marignon. Attacking them could result in considerable territorial gains for C'Tis, given our long border with Ermor.
But we won't. Doing so would break our word and our public policy of strict neutrality.
To quote the Poles in 1939:
Peace is a noble and desirable thing... But peace, like anything else in this world, has a price - a high and measurable one. We do not understand the concept of peace at any price. There is only one thing in the lives of men, nation, and countries that is without price. That thing is honor.
Again, C'Tis reiterates its neutrality in all ongoing conflicts.
That being said, do not confuse C'Tis's position of neutrality with either appeasement or weakness. We will trade with anyone, and will demand a fair price. And if anyone attempts to invade us, we will fight back. Our armies may be puny, but our tech is very good.
So I would strongly suggest that the major powers turn elsewhere if they want a war, as fighting us would only result in long, bloody sieges that could prove to be a fatal distraction when fighting the real superpowers in this game.
I'm also going to point out that now is a fine time for C'Tis to also attack Ermor since they seem to be under attack from both Abysia and Marignon. Attacking them could result in considerable territorial gains for C'Tis, given our long border with Ermor.
But we won't. Doing so would break our word and our public policy of strict neutrality.
To quote the Poles in 1939:
Peace is a noble and desirable thing... But peace, like anything else in this world, has a price - a high and measurable one. We do not understand the concept of peace at any price. There is only one thing in the lives of men, nation, and countries that is without price. That thing is honor.
Last edited by Zinegata on Tue Jul 26, 2011 5:53 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 29894
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
-
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 968
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Spite may have factored into it, but it wasn't actually last-minute. By the time I picked up the reins of Abysia, Ermor's dominion was already pushed several provinces back from the border, right up to their capital. The strategy against Ermor from the point we went into Total War was always domkill. Mostly because Ermor's dominion was really really weak compared to ours, and we had both bloodsac, a prophet, and our pretender parked on the Ermorian border.
It just happens that the elimination of Ermor was our only achievable objective left in the war, since Pangaea refused our surrender in favor of taking all our base and is in very good position to end us within the next couple turns.
Assuming having a Lich, no provinces, and ridiculous amounts of dominion built up doesn't result in holding on with a single unit forever, anyway. <_<
It just happens that the elimination of Ermor was our only achievable objective left in the war, since Pangaea refused our surrender in favor of taking all our base and is in very good position to end us within the next couple turns.
Assuming having a Lich, no provinces, and ridiculous amounts of dominion built up doesn't result in holding on with a single unit forever, anyway. <_<
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:I'm not going to go full-asshole, but I'm turning up the dial about 50 millikaeliks.
- Ancient History
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 12708
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm
C'Tis proposes a peace conference to equitably divide Ermor amongst its neighbors.
In addition, C'Tis would like to announce our desire to take one or two of low-value Ermorian border provinces to make our Eastern line of control a little neater.
Also, remind me... does C'Tis have an official NAP with Marignon, Abysia, and Man yet? In which case we'd like to offer all of them a standard 3-turn NAP.
In addition, C'Tis would like to announce our desire to take one or two of low-value Ermorian border provinces to make our Eastern line of control a little neater.
Also, remind me... does C'Tis have an official NAP with Marignon, Abysia, and Man yet? In which case we'd like to offer all of them a standard 3-turn NAP.
Last edited by Zinegata on Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:15 am, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 29894
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm