That's factually wrong. Even if it were true that you could only break it down into non-superpositioning (which is far from clear), then all that would mean is that you'd have to use really a lot of entangled particles.Lago PARANOIA wrote:So... thoughts?Any time where you can know the spin of a particle, the entanglement is destroyed. The only time entanglement exists is when two particles are in a superposition - they're really the same thing, a superposition exists because you don't know the states of the entangled particles. In order to send information via spin-coupling, you need to know what the spin is at your end much in the same way you need to know, at your end, if you've just made a dot or a dash when sending morse code, otherwise you're sending information free noise - and to do that means pulling it out of a superposition, which means the entanglement is destroyed. Removing the entanglement just gives you a probabilistic collapse from a superposition to a known state, meaning you get random noise at both ends which no information can be encoded in. It's effectively identical at both ends, but there's no information transmitted because it's randomised. There is absolutely no way to get around this. Any time you want to manipulate a particle, you remove the entanglement and such manipulation is what is needed for meaningful information to be encoded. Indeed, if you assume the hidden variables interpretation the appearance of entanglement and action-at-a-distance is just an illusion anyway.
To a first approximation, it appears that Neutrinos pass very slightly faster than light. Relativity doesn't fail, the world doesn't end, it's just that there are tachyons and you deal with that. Instantaneous transfer of states exists, the Copenhagen Interpretation is crap, and things move faster than light all the time without traveling backwards in time and then crawling over at C.
-Username17