I don't know what to do, or what to say.
Moderator: Moderators
I don't know what to do, or what to say.
Ok this is a tiny little corner of the web where nobody who knows me goes so I'm gonna talk about a moral problem I'm having.
I haven't talked here before about the fact that I spend my days in NYC doing stand up comedy. That's what I do. I tell jokes on stages and try to make people laugh. It's cool and it puts me in contact with a lot of other people who are doing the same thing. It also puts me kind of close to the source for lots of stuff that is pretty big on the internet. I see guys and girls from Collegehumor a lot, I see a lot of other people who make the web content that goes big and and goes wide while that content is still being formed. That's often cool but lately it's been upsetting.
The thing is that there is a trend right now for "Giving money to poor people" videos that is just exploding. I know several different crews that have made their own and gotten a lot of response from it. Some even getting on the news. I'm seeing more and more of these getting started and more and more of the same videos popping up all over my facebook feed as people share these "heartwarming" videos.
If you've never seen one they're pretty simple. Someone goes up to someone who is poor and not uncommonly homeless and gives them money. Maybe it's a hundred dollar bill, at most 200. Many times it is a more circuitous method like, for example, giving them a lottery ticket and secretly filming the reaction when they find out it's a winner and get their money.
Here's the thing. These disgust me. I can't handle it. I know exactly the ad revenues they pull of these and it's a flat positive investment, that's a thing being openly talked about. The length of time for shooting, the amount they can give away and to exactly who being compared on charts to pageviews and revenue it will generate. It's heartless business and the emotion in them is so disgustingly manufactured that seeing it being praised over every media platform as faith-restoring humanitarian work is making me physically feel ill several times a day. Not to mention that the people doing them are almost uniformly the worst of our ilk.I don't resent people for being fame-hounds, it's almost a part of the profession but there is a sort of person who just exudes obvious sociopathy and a limitless hunger for limelight and those are the people who have been flying like moths to this trend.
It's been really hard for me to sit next to or do shows with these people and shrug it off. The greedy manipulative abuse of public sentimentality and the perversion of the very concept of charity has been difficult for me to watch but so far that's all I've done. Because while I may find it sickening I am also aware that their are still some poor people being handed money by people I know. My best estimate is that it is actually a net gain for the world even if it is a grotesque thing to listen to them talk about. A part of me feels like it should be shut down, that I should make some waves about it. Talk about it, write about it, etc. But the other part of me feels that if actual humans are having their conditions bettered then perhaps this is the best end to set selfish people to. Even if they have horrible motivations then someone is still getting food out of it so maybe it's good after all.
I just can't figure out what the moral and immoral thing here is. I know that every time I see or hear about it it makes me feel ill and dead inside, but if it's a net good then doing nothing and just dealing with it while it lasts may be the best thing to do.
I haven't talked here before about the fact that I spend my days in NYC doing stand up comedy. That's what I do. I tell jokes on stages and try to make people laugh. It's cool and it puts me in contact with a lot of other people who are doing the same thing. It also puts me kind of close to the source for lots of stuff that is pretty big on the internet. I see guys and girls from Collegehumor a lot, I see a lot of other people who make the web content that goes big and and goes wide while that content is still being formed. That's often cool but lately it's been upsetting.
The thing is that there is a trend right now for "Giving money to poor people" videos that is just exploding. I know several different crews that have made their own and gotten a lot of response from it. Some even getting on the news. I'm seeing more and more of these getting started and more and more of the same videos popping up all over my facebook feed as people share these "heartwarming" videos.
If you've never seen one they're pretty simple. Someone goes up to someone who is poor and not uncommonly homeless and gives them money. Maybe it's a hundred dollar bill, at most 200. Many times it is a more circuitous method like, for example, giving them a lottery ticket and secretly filming the reaction when they find out it's a winner and get their money.
Here's the thing. These disgust me. I can't handle it. I know exactly the ad revenues they pull of these and it's a flat positive investment, that's a thing being openly talked about. The length of time for shooting, the amount they can give away and to exactly who being compared on charts to pageviews and revenue it will generate. It's heartless business and the emotion in them is so disgustingly manufactured that seeing it being praised over every media platform as faith-restoring humanitarian work is making me physically feel ill several times a day. Not to mention that the people doing them are almost uniformly the worst of our ilk.I don't resent people for being fame-hounds, it's almost a part of the profession but there is a sort of person who just exudes obvious sociopathy and a limitless hunger for limelight and those are the people who have been flying like moths to this trend.
It's been really hard for me to sit next to or do shows with these people and shrug it off. The greedy manipulative abuse of public sentimentality and the perversion of the very concept of charity has been difficult for me to watch but so far that's all I've done. Because while I may find it sickening I am also aware that their are still some poor people being handed money by people I know. My best estimate is that it is actually a net gain for the world even if it is a grotesque thing to listen to them talk about. A part of me feels like it should be shut down, that I should make some waves about it. Talk about it, write about it, etc. But the other part of me feels that if actual humans are having their conditions bettered then perhaps this is the best end to set selfish people to. Even if they have horrible motivations then someone is still getting food out of it so maybe it's good after all.
I just can't figure out what the moral and immoral thing here is. I know that every time I see or hear about it it makes me feel ill and dead inside, but if it's a net good then doing nothing and just dealing with it while it lasts may be the best thing to do.
DSMatticus wrote:Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. I am filled with an unfathomable hatred.
In other words, they're everything that is wrong with sites like Upworthy, and you have to work with them? That sounds fucking miserable. I'd say that sounds like good material for a vicious standup routine, but I don't know how that'd affect you professionally.
That said, if it does in fact provide a net gain for poor people, fuck it. The shittiness of the world is too exhausting as it is to lose sleep over some smarmy fuck doing "charity" work as a attention-whoring gimmick.
That said, if it does in fact provide a net gain for poor people, fuck it. The shittiness of the world is too exhausting as it is to lose sleep over some smarmy fuck doing "charity" work as a attention-whoring gimmick.
The way I'd look at it is this: "Is it doing harm?" I mean, sure, jerks are handing random people $100, and making, what, $1000? $10,000? So they go on and give another poor person $100 so they can make another $1000 or $10,000? It sounds to me like they're making charity into an actual profitable business model. If poor people are eating when they otherwise wouldn't be, I don't much care if the person who is enabling that is driving around in a gold-plated rolls royce packed with hookers. Some poor guy still got to eat.
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.
You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:18 pm
See, I don't know that is the right way to look at things. I mean, the administrative costs of charities and how much money actually goes to the benefit of the cause is a huge deal. Nobody wants to give a dollar to a charity if only a penny is going towards the thing they think they're helping. A "charity" that exists to primarily enrich it's operatives is a scam; regardless of what incidental good they might be doing.Prak_Anima wrote:The way I'd look at it is this: "Is it doing harm?" I mean, sure, jerks are handing random people $100, and making, what, $1000? $10,000? So they go on and give another poor person $100 so they can make another $1000 or $10,000? It sounds to me like they're making charity into an actual profitable business model. If poor people are eating when they otherwise wouldn't be, I don't much care if the person who is enabling that is driving around in a gold-plated rolls royce packed with hookers. Some poor guy still got to eat.
@vitm - If the opportunistic donors are asking for money to give away, then that's all fraudulent charity style. If they're capitalizing on an act of kindness, that's just kind of self-aggrandizing, with just a touch of exploitation thrown in.
My son makes me laugh. Maybe he'll make you laugh, too.
For the latter they're kinda douches, but as douchery goes that's the best kind I can think of as there is little to no harm and some good done.Maj wrote:If they're capitalizing on an act of kindness, that's just kind of self-aggrandizing, with just a touch of exploitation thrown in.
I think it is very human to be spiteful at people profiting from apparent charity. It is normal to want to spite someone getting $9 if you are only getting $1 by forfeiting both, even if you'd both be better off overall.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimatum_game
- Josh_Kablack
- King
- Posts: 5318
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Online. duh
This sort of thing has been going on for millenia now:
The Book of Matthew wrote: 2 “So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. 3 But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4 so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
"But transportation issues are social-justice issues. The toll of bad transit policies and worse infrastructure—trains and buses that don’t run well and badly serve low-income neighborhoods, vehicular traffic that pollutes the environment and endangers the lives of cyclists and pedestrians—is borne disproportionately by black and brown communities."
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1854
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:21 am
I would say you find an audience that's more receptive to that sort of thing (I don't know... middle-aged people? Do you perform for disgruntled atheists?), get some solid support for your facts, and work a little something into your comedy routine.
It could be a stretch, but could you try and get an article written up on Cracked, CollegeHumor, or something on Colbert/Daily Show?
It could be a stretch, but could you try and get an article written up on Cracked, CollegeHumor, or something on Colbert/Daily Show?
DSMatticus wrote:Again, look at this fucking map you moron. Take your finger and trace each country's coast, then trace its claim line. Even you - and I say that as someone who could not think less of your intelligence - should be able to tell that one of these things is not like the other.
Kaelik wrote:I invented saying mean things about Tussock.
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1060
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:51 pm
I'd read a Cracked article outing the deceptive giver... industry? I have no idea what to call it....You Lost Me wrote:I would say you find an audience that's more receptive to that sort of thing (I don't know... middle-aged people? Do you perform for disgruntled atheists?), get some solid support for your facts, and work a little something into your comedy routine.
It could be a stretch, but could you try and get an article written up on Cracked, CollegeHumor, or something on Colbert/Daily Show?
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1854
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:21 am
You should write an article at the very least. It would give me something to link my friends when I rage at them.
DSMatticus wrote:Again, look at this fucking map you moron. Take your finger and trace each country's coast, then trace its claim line. Even you - and I say that as someone who could not think less of your intelligence - should be able to tell that one of these things is not like the other.
Kaelik wrote:I invented saying mean things about Tussock.
End result is that homeless people get food. Also, a bunch of people watch charity happen, and are probably more likely to follow that example.
Vebyast wrote:Here's a fun target for Major Creation: hydrazine. One casting every six seconds at CL9 gives you a bit more than 40 liters per second, which is comparable to the flow rates of some small, but serious, rocket engines. Six items running at full blast through a well-engineered engine will put you, and something like 50 tons of cargo, into space. Alternatively, if you thrust sideways, you will briefly be a fireball screaming across the sky at mach 14 before you melt from atmospheric friction.
Actually there is good reason to believe that random acts of gifting people $100 are basically completely meaningless and unhelpful. And only constant expected support helps people.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Sure. But even so, would you rather have $100 or not-$100?Kaelik wrote:Actually there is good reason to believe that random acts of gifting people $100 are basically completely meaningless and unhelpful. And only constant expected support helps people.
Vebyast wrote:Here's a fun target for Major Creation: hydrazine. One casting every six seconds at CL9 gives you a bit more than 40 liters per second, which is comparable to the flow rates of some small, but serious, rocket engines. Six items running at full blast through a well-engineered engine will put you, and something like 50 tons of cargo, into space. Alternatively, if you thrust sideways, you will briefly be a fireball screaming across the sky at mach 14 before you melt from atmospheric friction.
Well I don't know, if I'm homeless, and other homeless people who are assholes know I have it, probably not $100.fectin wrote:Sure. But even so, would you rather have $100 or not-$100?Kaelik wrote:Actually there is good reason to believe that random acts of gifting people $100 are basically completely meaningless and unhelpful. And only constant expected support helps people.
Which is probably why one time large infusions almost never bring people out of poverty, and they spend it all immediately, and often end up in the hospital from overeating after starving for months.
So yeah, keep thinking money works the same for homeless people as your tax rebate does for you and giving them the chance to buy a new cool thing and they will keep on starving in the streets when they aren't getting beaten up or suffering food shock.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Wait... Didn't someone post an article to the contrary of that somewhere?
My son makes me laugh. Maybe he'll make you laugh, too.
To the contrary of what?Maj wrote:Wait... Didn't someone post an article to the contrary of that somewhere?
I mean, it is about poor people, so I can guarantee you that someone somewhere has written an article supporting every conceivable position.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Yeah, I remember it too. The posited scenario was far different from walking up to a guy on the street and handing him a $100, though. It was more like "Here, here's a few thousand. You'll get another few thousand in a month. And so on."
Should be a few pages back in Non-political news.
Should be a few pages back in Non-political news.
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.
You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
-
- King
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am
You can't really help the homeless without offering them a stable environment for them to sort their shit out and reintegrate into society (and even then, they have a lot of underlying problems that need taken care of before that process can even begin). They're not going to go from wandering the streets to productive members of societies because of a one-time infusion of cash that covers less than a week of an ordinary person's living expenses. They're going to splurge on consumables and be back where they started, because that's all they can do. Which, don't get me wrong, homeless people buying consumables to consume so they don't starve is great. But in the grand scheme of how shitty their life is you haven't done much for them, and you would probably be better off donating that money to a legitimate charity which provides that sort of support and contributing (in some small part) to actually taking someone off the street.
- OgreBattle
- King
- Posts: 6820
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am
Make a parody video* act where you give money to 'the homeless' (actually a prostitute), and then talka bout how you were so charitable you let them stay at your house one night too. Play it straight, say something like "Charity is its own reward".
*or a standup act where you talk about how you got into that "give money to the poor" trend and tell them your story of how you did some giving to the 'poor'.
*or a standup act where you talk about how you got into that "give money to the poor" trend and tell them your story of how you did some giving to the 'poor'.
Last edited by OgreBattle on Fri Mar 07, 2014 7:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1854
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:21 am
I remember reading an article about it, but I don't know anything about where it was. Some group gave 10-ish veteran homeless people several thousand dollars in a one-time installation, then checked in periodically to see what the homeless people were doing. The response was generally positive--I think all of them saved money, and most spent their money on things that advanced their status in society.Prak_Anima wrote:Yeah, I remember it too. The posited scenario was far different from walking up to a guy on the street and handing him a $100, though. It was more like "Here, here's a few thousand. You'll get another few thousand in a month. And so on."
But, you know, anecdotes.
DSMatticus wrote:Again, look at this fucking map you moron. Take your finger and trace each country's coast, then trace its claim line. Even you - and I say that as someone who could not think less of your intelligence - should be able to tell that one of these things is not like the other.
Kaelik wrote:I invented saying mean things about Tussock.
Or alternatively, several thousand dollars can actually buy you something actually fucking useful to improve your status, and $100 definitely fucking can't, because you need to eat and sleep and shower, and having done that, you have zero dollars left....You Lost Me wrote:I remember reading an article about it, but I don't know anything about where it was. Some group gave 10-ish veteran homeless people several thousand dollars in a one-time installation, then checked in periodically to see what the homeless people were doing. The response was generally positive--I think all of them saved money, and most spent their money on things that advanced their status in society.Prak_Anima wrote:Yeah, I remember it too. The posited scenario was far different from walking up to a guy on the street and handing him a $100, though. It was more like "Here, here's a few thousand. You'll get another few thousand in a month. And so on."
But, you know, anecdotes.
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Yeah. The most a homeless guy can do with a one time $100 is load a bunch of money on a prepaid phone so he can keep in touch with loved ones, or whatever for a while. And even then he's better off doling it out to buy food to keep himself going, or buying something which removes a discomfort of homelessness.
Hell, I'd like to say that if you walked up to me and handed me $100 that I'd do something with it, but I know myself well enough to know that I would totally intend to use it to pay some of my phone debt, or whatever, but I would really just hold onto it while I procrastinated talking to the phone company and slowly hemorrhage the money into my gas tank and buying lunch on days like today where it turns 230 and all I've eaten is a couple pieces of toast and I'm out at school and chipotle sounds good.
Hell, I'd like to say that if you walked up to me and handed me $100 that I'd do something with it, but I know myself well enough to know that I would totally intend to use it to pay some of my phone debt, or whatever, but I would really just hold onto it while I procrastinated talking to the phone company and slowly hemorrhage the money into my gas tank and buying lunch on days like today where it turns 230 and all I've eaten is a couple pieces of toast and I'm out at school and chipotle sounds good.
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.
You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
- CatharzGodfoot
- King
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: North Carolina
Terrible people will still do good if it's in their selfish interest.
It's best to create situations where selfish actions will also benefit others, but to remember that terrible people are still terrible even when they are doing good.
It's best to create situations where selfish actions will also benefit others, but to remember that terrible people are still terrible even when they are doing good.
The law in its majestic equality forbids the rich as well as the poor from stealing bread, begging and sleeping under bridges.
-Anatole France
Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.
-Josh Kablack
-Anatole France
Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.
-Josh Kablack