It's a real bill before the House of Representitives Judiciary Committee. It's not a joke, unfortunately.
Here's the fun part:
`Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Supreme Court shall not have jurisdiction to review, by appeal, writ of certiorari, or otherwise, any matter to the extent that relief is sought against an element of Federal, State, or local government, or against an officer of Federal, State, or local government (whether or not acting in official personal capacity), by reason of that element's or officer's acknowledgement of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government.'.
Translation: if a police officer decides to get jiggy on his spare time and burn the homes of suspected witches - then if your house got burned down the courts are powerless to give you any form of redress.
And if that wasn't crazy enough, it's possible that the later provisions of this bill get even scarier:
In interpreting and applying the Constitution of the United States, a court of the United States may not rely upon any constitution, law, administrative rule, Executive order, directive, policy, judicial decision, or any other action of any foreign state or international organization or agency, other than the constitutional law and English common law.
Translation: treaties, including formal agreements with Native American Peoples, as well as with foreign powers, are unenforcable in court. All of them. Our extradition agreements with Canada down to our promises to punish American citizens for firing grenades over the Mexican border.
If this passes, we don't even formally own Alaska any more. We are just a military occupant. But that's OK, because militarily occupying stuff isn't against the law any more (or at least, isn't enforcable as such in court).
There are seriously Nuremburg Provisions that I would rather see passed.
-Username17