Is 3rd Edition dead yet?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Invincible Overlord
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am
Is 3rd Edition dead yet?
I thought it was, but it doesn't quite seem to be the case. While WotC stopped producing material for 3rd Edition, other people still have projects that use the system, notably Order of the Stick and whatever the fuck Paizo is doing.
Though for my money you couldn't get a system more entrenched in popular culture than AD&D. Pretty much ANY cRPG, with the exception of the MP mechanic, sucked that system off and hard.
Though for my money you couldn't get a system more entrenched in popular culture than AD&D. Pretty much ANY cRPG, with the exception of the MP mechanic, sucked that system off and hard.
Word.
I like 3e. It has many bugs, but I understand the system and it works for me, for what it tries to do. I don't despise 4e so much as I am filled with ennui by it, so we're not going there.
Also, if I gave up on 3e, Sig and I would have to totally redo Project Feybook. Ain't doin' that.
I like 3e. It has many bugs, but I understand the system and it works for me, for what it tries to do. I don't despise 4e so much as I am filled with ennui by it, so we're not going there.
Also, if I gave up on 3e, Sig and I would have to totally redo Project Feybook. Ain't doin' that.
MartinHarper wrote:Babies are difficult to acquire in comparison to other sources of nutrition.
- Josh_Kablack
- King
- Posts: 5318
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Online. duh
Given the license issues, pretty much every publisher aside from WotC is stuck working with 3e mechanics for their material.
That's going to keep it from totally dying off (or even falling to the rare level of OD&D games) for quite some time.
That's going to keep it from totally dying off (or even falling to the rare level of OD&D games) for quite some time.
"But transportation issues are social-justice issues. The toll of bad transit policies and worse infrastructure—trains and buses that don’t run well and badly serve low-income neighborhoods, vehicular traffic that pollutes the environment and endangers the lives of cyclists and pedestrians—is borne disproportionately by black and brown communities."
- JonSetanta
- King
- Posts: 5525
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: interbutts
Double word. Feybook is not going 4e. If anything, Anets won't even let me push a few 4e revisions such as CON score to HP, static skill bonuses, and so on.... although allowing per-encounter mechanics was a smart move.Talisman wrote:Word.
I like 3e. It has many bugs, but I understand the system and it works for me, for what it tries to do. I don't despise 4e so much as I am filled with ennui by it, so we're not going there.
Also, if I gave up on 3e, Sig and I would have to totally redo Project Feybook. Ain't doin' that.
3e may have flaws but I've known it for almost a decade. It's worked, mostly, for that long without making me toss handfuls of 3e paper around screaming FUCK THIS FUCKING FUCKSHIT.
You older gamers probably feel or felt the same way about AD&D in kind, but having converted from AD&D (later revisions) to 3.0 back when it debuted I did experience both (and a little 1e) just enough to state confidently that yes indeed 3e is better IMHO.
There are ways of increasing its durability, such as E6 and various spell nerfs, but as a whole I don't find too much wrong with the system to give it up just because the creators said "OK, everybody move down! Clean cup clean cup MOOOVE DOOOOWN".
The Adventurer's Almanac wrote: ↑Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pmNobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.
Hilarious fact: Con score to hp would make warriors suck right from level 1.
Hans Freyer, s.b.u.h. wrote:A manly, a bold tone prevails in history. He who has the grip has the booty.
Huston Smith wrote:Life gives us no view of the whole. We see only snatches here and there, (...)
brotherfrancis75 wrote:Perhaps you imagine that Ayn Rand is our friend? And the Mont Pelerin Society? No, those are but the more subtle versions of the Bolshevik Communist Revolution you imagine you reject. (...) FOX NEWS IS ALSO COMMUNIST!
LDSChristian wrote:True. I do wonder which is worse: killing so many people like Hitler did or denying Christ 3 times like Peter did.
-
- Invincible Overlord
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am
Yeah, about that OGL yanking.
What the fuck?
I don't see hardly any books for 4th Edition out there in the gaming store or in bookstores lately. That's probably because you could hold all of the official material (not counting core rules duplicates) in one hand. After 4 months of being out.
Not really savvy of WotC. Are they TRYING to kill their product off?
Personally, I think it'd be really funny if 4th Edition went under but 3rd continued to chug along. Who knows, it might even happen by this time next year.
What the fuck?
I don't see hardly any books for 4th Edition out there in the gaming store or in bookstores lately. That's probably because you could hold all of the official material (not counting core rules duplicates) in one hand. After 4 months of being out.
Not really savvy of WotC. Are they TRYING to kill their product off?
Personally, I think it'd be really funny if 4th Edition went under but 3rd continued to chug along. Who knows, it might even happen by this time next year.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
- Hey_I_Can_Chan
- Master
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
No, WOTC are trying to corner their market share.
Dude, yes.
3(.whatever)E remains a solid, tested system with vast support and, I'm guessing, thousands of books available, now, often, at cut-rate prices.
3(.whatever)E is viable and playable--4E is a tactical wargame with a nod at role-playing, which is what the vast majority of folks consider neither viable nor playable.
It just might take some of them a while to come around.
To Spycraft 2.0.
Dude, yes.
3(.whatever)E remains a solid, tested system with vast support and, I'm guessing, thousands of books available, now, often, at cut-rate prices.
3(.whatever)E is viable and playable--4E is a tactical wargame with a nod at role-playing, which is what the vast majority of folks consider neither viable nor playable.
It just might take some of them a while to come around.
To Spycraft 2.0.
But Spycraft isn't D&D. No, shut up, it's not. It only does one thing well, but luckily, that's what it was made to do:
Modern-day, magic-free*, deadly "Who you are seriously doesn't matter when combat breaks out, not even your stats. Simply the size of your penis extension gun." games. That's all.
So really, we want people to return to D&D 3E. Hell, most of the bugs were fixed by F&K - if people just quit crying "But core isn't perfect!" and used that, they'd be happy. As opposed to saying "Core isn't perfect.", crying, and deciding to use 4E, which is a heap of shit and HASN'T been fixed yet.
*No monsters. No magic. No psionics. Guns only. FINAL DESTINATION.
Modern-day, magic-free*, deadly "Who you are seriously doesn't matter when combat breaks out, not even your stats. Simply the size of your penis extension gun." games. That's all.
So really, we want people to return to D&D 3E. Hell, most of the bugs were fixed by F&K - if people just quit crying "But core isn't perfect!" and used that, they'd be happy. As opposed to saying "Core isn't perfect.", crying, and deciding to use 4E, which is a heap of shit and HASN'T been fixed yet.
*No monsters. No magic. No psionics. Guns only. FINAL DESTINATION.
Ennui is definitely my take on 4e. Nothing about it excites me at all. Given the choice between it and 3e, I would take 3e hands-down.
While I like that 3e probably won't be disappearing in a puff of smoke since 4e is not a viable replacement for it with their new "OGL." So much of the d20 crap that was made during 3e's reign was utter crap and useless. Pretty much anything "modern" is a mess with 3e/d20 rules. I do appreciate that 4e is driving other game companies to try different things rather than to try and ride the coat-tails of the 4e system even if it had no place there.
A positive example, Savage Worlds is very much to my liking with very minor tweaking. I'm sure there are other game systems out there as well which will be getting some attention by developers.
While I like that 3e probably won't be disappearing in a puff of smoke since 4e is not a viable replacement for it with their new "OGL." So much of the d20 crap that was made during 3e's reign was utter crap and useless. Pretty much anything "modern" is a mess with 3e/d20 rules. I do appreciate that 4e is driving other game companies to try different things rather than to try and ride the coat-tails of the 4e system even if it had no place there.
A positive example, Savage Worlds is very much to my liking with very minor tweaking. I'm sure there are other game systems out there as well which will be getting some attention by developers.
3e isn't dead by any stretch, and because people have been playing with it for 10 years now, I think most people have developed a sane system of house rules. Plus, the Core Rules are fairly workable at low levels... just have to watch out for game-ruining insta-kills.
That said, 4e has a lot of untapped potential. The basic mechanics are solid... the classes, skills, and powers presented are simply boring and 'safe' from a game design POV (and they still managed to screw the pooch with Blade Cascade).
That said, 4e has a lot of untapped potential. The basic mechanics are solid... the classes, skills, and powers presented are simply boring and 'safe' from a game design POV (and they still managed to screw the pooch with Blade Cascade).
To the scientist there is the joy in pursuing truth which nearly counteracts the depressing revelations of truth. ~HP Lovecraft
-
- Prince
- Posts: 3295
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 4:22 pm
There's actually a lot more problems than blade cascade. Pretty much all the epic level stuff doesn't work. Orb of Imposition is broken. Bolstering blood is broke. Solo monsters pretty much suck. And so on.rapa-nui wrote: That said, 4e has a lot of untapped potential. The basic mechanics are solid... the classes, skills, and powers presented are simply boring and 'safe' from a game design POV (and they still managed to screw the pooch with Blade Cascade).
There are still way fewer problems than 3.5, but it's not like 4E is perfect.
I do agree that the basic mechanics of 4E are pretty good. The change from divergent bonus accumulation for BaB, AC and saves to a more structured system is much better. 4E characters stay on the RNG much better than anything 3.5 ever did and this is good.
The only problem of course is actually making 4E an interesting game to play.
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:19 pm
I don't think so. I think that they are victim to their own design. They even talk about open source software in the description of the old OGL They just happen to be the fork rather than the main path. Sucks for them.Lago PARANOIA wrote: Not really savvy of WotC. Are they TRYING to kill their product off?
Personally, I think it'd be really funny if 4th Edition went under but 3rd continued to chug along. Who knows, it might even happen by this time next year.
-----
Not trying to start a flame war, just asking: have you played Spycraft 2.0? I feel that it works very well as is. Yes, the default setting is guns blazing deadly but there are options that dial that down quite a bit. Also on the horizon is Fantasy Craft which takes the general mechanic for Spycraft and puts it in the fantasy environment.Koumei wrote: But Spycraft isn't D&D. No, shut up, it's not. It only does one thing well, but luckily, that's what it was made to do:
Modern-day, magic-free*, deadly "Who you are seriously doesn't matter when combat breaks out, not even your stats. Simply the size of your penis extension gun." games. That's all.
So really, we want people to return to D&D 3E. Hell, most of the bugs were fixed by F&K - if people just quit crying "But core isn't perfect!" and used that, they'd be happy. As opposed to saying "Core isn't perfect.", crying, and deciding to use 4E, which is a heap of shit and HASN'T been fixed yet.
*No monsters. No magic. No psionics. Guns only. FINAL DESTINATION.
As always YMMV. I just wanted to point out that D&D is NOT the end all / be all of fantasy gaming.
Last edited by ludomastro on Sat Oct 18, 2008 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Judging__Eagle
- Prince
- Posts: 4671
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada
It's just the "start-all" of table top rpgs.
Edit: Also, don't worry about starting a flame-war with Koumei. She's a rabid aussie, she gets into fights with everyone over trivialities and has less reasoning ability or creativity than anyone that I know.
Edit: Also, don't worry about starting a flame-war with Koumei. She's a rabid aussie, she gets into fights with everyone over trivialities and has less reasoning ability or creativity than anyone that I know.
Last edited by Judging__Eagle on Sat Oct 18, 2008 8:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.
While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
The gateway game, as it were?
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:19 pm
Not exactly. The majority, sure. I got my start with TSR products but not D&D.Judging__Eagle wrote:It's just the "start-all" of table top rpgs.
It was a choose-your-own-path style book set in Forgotten Realms.
- Judging__Eagle
- Prince
- Posts: 4671
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada
Ludo: Yes, I played it and didn't like it. Partly it was the GM, partly it was the fact that I wasn't interested in what the Spycraft rules were designed to cover. When your penis extension means more than you do, fiery death can't just be called from the skies without scheduling for an air strike ahead of time, and "I say we kick the door down and bust some ass" is never a valid option, it's not the game I want to play.
And I'm confident that the fantasy supplement will be poorly implemented ala d20 Modern's Urban Arcana, won't change the actual style of gameplay (some of the helicopters that you blow up with your anti-tank penis will be dragon-shaped, minotaurs will wander around and kill people... with assault rifles, and so forth), and that D&D 3E will just be a better game to play.
JE: If you had left it at "less reasoning capability" I'd actually have said "Yep, pretty much." As it is, I think I'll just call you a (generic insult) and tell you to (some kind of insulting directive).
And I'm confident that the fantasy supplement will be poorly implemented ala d20 Modern's Urban Arcana, won't change the actual style of gameplay (some of the helicopters that you blow up with your anti-tank penis will be dragon-shaped, minotaurs will wander around and kill people... with assault rifles, and so forth), and that D&D 3E will just be a better game to play.
JE: If you had left it at "less reasoning capability" I'd actually have said "Yep, pretty much." As it is, I think I'll just call you a (generic insult) and tell you to (some kind of insulting directive).
- Hey_I_Can_Chan
- Master
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
Hell, then, I'll bite.But Spycraft isn't D&D. No, shut up, it's not. It only does one thing well, but luckily, that's what it was made to do:
Modern-day, magic-free*, deadly "Who you are seriously doesn't matter when combat breaks out, not even your stats. Simply the size of your penis extension gun." games. That's all.
*No monsters. No magic. No psionics. Guns only. FINAL DESTINATION.
…the fuck is that?
Because you didn't specify:
1. If you're talking first-edition Spycraft it had A) monsters, B) magic (both ritual and spellcasting), and C) psionics.
2. If you're talking Spycraft 2.0 it has A) as many monsters as Champions, and both B) an in-process magic system, and C) a psionics system, the latter adapted from the previous version.
Further, every combat feat actually affects combat, too. Ability scores are ridiculously important, and only campaign qualities make the game as gun-heavy as you seem to think.
Yeah, so, um, STFU.
- Absentminded_Wizard
- Duke
- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Contact:
But you could say the same thing about 2e when 3e came out. I think the real difference between the two transitions is that 3e actually tried to do some stuff that made the game more flexible (like completely open multiclassing that any character of any race could do). 4e, on the other hand, largely tries to take away cool options in order to fix the balance problems of the previoius editions (like turning multiclassing into a joke).rapa-nui wrote:3e isn't dead by any stretch, and because people have been playing with it for 10 years now, I think most people have developed a sane system of house rules.
I agree that there are some decent ideas in 4e, albeit universally poorly executed. The problem is that the terms of the GSL don't allow you to modify the core rules to fix these problems. Therefore, there won't be any published alternate rules. Furthermore, unless the eternally forthcoming fan website license allows the posting of houserules, you'll have to keep any modifications to yourself or face WotC's legal brigade.That said, 4e has a lot of untapped potential. The basic mechanics are solid... the classes, skills, and powers presented are simply boring and 'safe' from a game design POV (and they still managed to screw the pooch with Blade Cascade).
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:19 pm
I am far more scared of the Hasbro legal team. WotC probably only gets one junior guy.[/i]Absentminded_Wizard wrote: <SNIP>
Therefore, there won't be any published alternate rules. Furthermore, unless the eternally forthcoming fan website license allows the posting of houserules, you'll have to keep any modifications to yourself or face WotC's legal brigade.
Last edited by ludomastro on Sun Oct 19, 2008 3:35 am, edited 3 times in total.
Sounds like it was 2nd edition then - I didn't see any mention of such in the core book, but if you're arguing that it was released in a supplement, then you're telling me I need to pirate buy extra crap just to hammer the game into being what I want it to be.Hey_I_Can_Chan wrote: 1. If you're talking first-edition Spycraft it had A) monsters, B) magic (both ritual and spellcasting), and C) psionics.
It was a few years ago, if that helps determine which edition it was. Some time in late 05, I think.
Lies. Again, unless we're talking some magical splat book. Protip: if I like the basic game, I'm willing to invest in supplements that will add more options. But if I don't like the basic game, I'd rather kick it to the curb than try to salvage it by buying more shit.2. If you're talking Spycraft 2.0 it has A) as many monsters as Champions,
Unless of course Champions had 0 monsters, in which case that sounds accurate. I wouldn't know, I have not even seen the book for Champions.
What do you mean by "campaign qualities"? Combat with guns really does boil down to "If I go first, I shoot him. If that hits, he dies." Now I'm sure gun-free combat works differently and is a lot better, but because they're so effective, everyone uses them. I think the difference in classes might just boil down to "Rocket launcher", "Shotgun Bitch", "Sniper Camper Whore" and "Machine Gunner".Further, every combat feat actually affects combat, too. Ability scores are ridiculously important, and only campaign qualities make the game as gun-heavy as you seem to think.
So really, a campaign that doesn't make that the case is essentially a campaign of gentleman's agreement not to use guns. So, presumably, a game not set in America and that isn't law enforcement or military themed. Which doesn't seem to be the angle that the game is going for - even the name suggests you're playing CIA specialists, much like the original PC game of the same name.
Oh come on, when have you ever known me to shut up?Yeah, so, um, STFU.
- Judging__Eagle
- Prince
- Posts: 4671
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada
I'm with Absentminded on the reasons that the migration to 3e from 2e was easy, while the migration from 3e to 4e will be next to impossible for me.
Giving up options is the height of retardedness. Especially when all the options are the ones that gave the game fluff and panache.
Koumei,
Welcome to the gulf of Sar.
Location: between you and me.
-JE
Giving up options is the height of retardedness. Especially when all the options are the ones that gave the game fluff and panache.
Koumei,
Welcome to the gulf of Sar.
Location: between you and me.
-JE
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.
While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.