Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:26 am
This part is seriously up for debate. The English language offers you a number of ways to say the same thing, and D&D notoriously refuses to use consistent keywords to describe game concepts. It is not safe to assume that because you are seeing a different English word that the author is describing a wholly separate process. It's also not safe to assume that it refers to the same process. But even more importantly? Select is a word we introduced in this conversation: the SRD frequently uses the word "gain" to begin with, exactly like in the rogue entry.Kaelik wrote:Do you see any part of what you quoted in which it says "select"? No, so then how is that wrong. Instead, since gaining bonus feats doesn't require meeting pre reqs, and using doesn't require meeting pre reqs, how is that false?
SRD wrote:A character can gain a feat at the same level at which he or she gains the prerequisite.
? No. The MM says that creatures (PC's are already creatures!) who already have bonus feats do not need to meet the prerequisites to use them. There is no description for how a creature acquires such feats. Things in the monster manual acquire them by virtue of having them written in their stat block already, in the same way elves have low-light vision by virtue of having it written in their features. Your elf doesn't get +1000 strength or "a million bonus feats" because you write them on the character sheet.You Lost Me wrote:So if I made a "monster" that was actually a human with class levels (since they do stuff like that in the MM), and I wanted a bonus feat but didn't have the prerequisites, I could just give it to myself because the Monster Manual says so? I mean, that's RAW right?