Still more Threads that make us Laugh, Cry, or Both

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Bigode
Duke
Posts: 2246
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Bigode »

sigma999 wrote:Point taken, but there are alternatives to multiquote arguments.
Namely, compromise or ignorance... the latter of which ubernoob has come to find very recently. Sure beats being banned.
Compromise in an objective argument means "being willing to do a hackjob". Ignorance ... the word should say it all. And if someone's gonna ban people for actually debating (i.e. not what unbernoob's doing by own admission), they aren't worthy of attention anyway.
sigma999 wrote:I see Tome as a product of agreement rather than debate since changes Frank and Keith mostly agreed upon entered the Tome series, unless there were more one-sided pushes for a personal idea than us readers will know.
No one-sidedness (AFAIK), but the agreements were reached in ... interesting ways.
sigma999 wrote:As for TNE it's been nothing but debate until Frank steps in to declare "This is what we're doing".
Debate can collect opinions but that's all it ever amounts to until leadership and objectives are introduced.
First, "this is what we are doing" isn't even near always just his opinion: simply other people mostly trust him to argue his ideas; see, for example, how I and Catharz rarely miss opportunities to advocate using the Hindu planes. Second, "objectives" are something that can come itself from debating - the fact that various members' desires are irreconciliable notwithstanding, since those are subjective issues, unlike ... a lot of what's being discussed.
sigma999 wrote:The degree to which a group debates a topic also varies (no, I don't assume "all debate is bad"). There's the Progressive Discussion direction, and then there's the Spiraling Disaster ubernoob and JaronK have brought upon themselves.
What happens when an unstoppable force meets an unmovable object?
What happens when an unending logical assault is directed at an RPG fan that won't admit they're wrong?
You could keep pushing.... or just do something more worth your time.
JaronK and ubernoob aren't trying anything other than feigning other people into thinking the biggest penis' theirs.
Hans Freyer, s.b.u.h. wrote:A manly, a bold tone prevails in history. He who has the grip has the booty.
Huston Smith wrote:Life gives us no view of the whole. We see only snatches here and there, (...)
brotherfrancis75 wrote:Perhaps you imagine that Ayn Rand is our friend? And the Mont Pelerin Society? No, those are but the more subtle versions of the Bolshevik Communist Revolution you imagine you reject. (...) FOX NEWS IS ALSO COMMUNIST!
LDSChristian wrote:True. I do wonder which is worse: killing so many people like Hitler did or denying Christ 3 times like Peter did.
Koumei
Serious Badass
Posts: 13902
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: South Ausfailia

Post by Koumei »

Bigode wrote:No one-sidedness (AFAIK), but the agreements were reached in ... interesting ways.
They said before that the way the Tomes came into being was through a lot of debate while walking the dog, and similar things. And there was plenty of arguing until they found points to agree on. It's just that now, all their arguing has to happen here over the internet so we don't just see the end results.
User avatar
Bigode
Duke
Posts: 2246
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Bigode »

Koumei wrote:They said before that the way the Tomes came into being was through a lot of debate while walking the dog, and similar things. And there was plenty of arguing until they found points to agree on. It's just that now, all their arguing has to happen here over the internet so we don't just see the end results.
Except that F&K already used to even insult each other over the Internet back in 2004, as per link (in case people didn't notice, most, if not all, instances of User3 in the link are K posting as guest). So talking about "the Tomes coming from agreement" as a slap in the practice of debating's pretty much a joke.
Hans Freyer, s.b.u.h. wrote:A manly, a bold tone prevails in history. He who has the grip has the booty.
Huston Smith wrote:Life gives us no view of the whole. We see only snatches here and there, (...)
brotherfrancis75 wrote:Perhaps you imagine that Ayn Rand is our friend? And the Mont Pelerin Society? No, those are but the more subtle versions of the Bolshevik Communist Revolution you imagine you reject. (...) FOX NEWS IS ALSO COMMUNIST!
LDSChristian wrote:True. I do wonder which is worse: killing so many people like Hitler did or denying Christ 3 times like Peter did.
ubernoob
Duke
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:30 am

Post by ubernoob »

AndyJames kept trolling in the private forum. It led to this, which IMO is very well done:
Sunic_Flames wrote: Well, right now the battlefield is looking something like this:

Andy:

Image

Ubernoob:

Image

Me? I'm having a snack. Even my chips are epic. See?

Image
User avatar
JonSetanta
King
Posts: 5580
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: interbutts

Post by JonSetanta »

Bigode wrote:interesting ways.
That... was enlightening.

ubernoob: You've so far done a logical approach, until Jaron's stubbornness bested your patience. I've come close to doing same when faced with the repetition of excuses for why warriors shouldn't eventually allowed "a critical on every weapon hit" and reasons my critical damage mechanics were broken, but chose instead to look the other way. He only cites obscure specifics and when I asked him to break a concept entirely using core rules there's only vague counters from him. It's seriously not worth my time but IMO you've done OK as far as verbal-cock-slapping on a forum, and I generally go with your views (although as far as deciding class tiers in general, one can only come to a reasonable consensus by popular vote... one person alone is always wrong)
The Adventurer's Almanac wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.
ubernoob
Duke
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:30 am

Post by ubernoob »

sigma999 wrote:
Bigode wrote:interesting ways.
That... was enlightening.

ubernoob: You've so far done a logical approach, until Jaron's stubbornness bested your patience. I've come close to doing same when faced with the repetition of excuses for why warriors shouldn't eventually allowed "a critical on every weapon hit" and reasons my critical damage mechanics were broken, but chose instead to look the other way. He only cites obscure specifics and when I asked him to break a concept entirely using core rules there's only vague counters from him. It's seriously not worth my time but IMO you've done OK as far as verbal-cock-slapping on a forum, and I generally go with your views
Good to know. Thanks for giving me an outside perspective to keep me aware. I really appreciate it when people help me stay outside of my personal biases.
Sigma999 wrote:(although as far as deciding class tiers in general, one can only come to a reasonable consensus by popular vote... one person alone is always wrong)
Well, I disagree here. I think one man one vote is an incribly stupid idea. However, tiers will vary based on the houserules and playstyle each group uses and what the fundamental goals are. Basically, my tiers are very good for RAW combat, but anything outside of that are pretty useless. Also, tier systems as a whole are kind of stupid to expect other people to use.
User avatar
JonSetanta
King
Posts: 5580
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: interbutts

Post by JonSetanta »

ubernoob wrote: Well, I disagree here. I think one man one vote is an incribly stupid idea. However, tiers will vary based on the houserules and playstyle each group uses and what the fundamental goals are. Basically, my tiers are very good for RAW combat, but anything outside of that are pretty useless. Also, tier systems as a whole are kind of stupid to expect other people to use.
For an example of what I mean by 'vote' look at the survey on Psychic Warrior tier.
Overwhelming majority chose Tier 3. That counts for something.
The Adventurer's Almanac wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.
ubernoob
Duke
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:30 am

Post by ubernoob »

sigma999 wrote:
ubernoob wrote: Well, I disagree here. I think one man one vote is an incribly stupid idea. However, tiers will vary based on the houserules and playstyle each group uses and what the fundamental goals are. Basically, my tiers are very good for RAW combat, but anything outside of that are pretty useless. Also, tier systems as a whole are kind of stupid to expect other people to use.
For an example of what I mean by 'vote' look at the survey on Psychic Warrior tier.
Overwhelming majority chose Tier 3. That counts for something.
Well, that was based upon compelling argument and used the relatively elite. Even so, fair 'nuff.
ubernoob
Duke
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:30 am

Post by ubernoob »

User avatar
Psychic Robot
Prince
Posts: 4607
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by Psychic Robot »

Lol, I want to see what happens with that thread with the Gleenazis.
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:
Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?
You do not seem to do anything.
User avatar
Judging__Eagle
Prince
Posts: 4671
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada

Post by Judging__Eagle »

I ... posted there. >_>
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.

While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
User avatar
Ice9
Duke
Posts: 1568
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Ice9 »

Ok, maybe I'm jumping aboard the failship right now, but ...

... what the hell, ubernoob? Alter Self is broken at any level? Stronger than Wildshape, more broken than Planar Binding, shatters the game more than Genesis? In my universe's version of D&D, the best thing that Alter Self can get you is a good fly speed or a crapload of natural armor. What exactly can it do in yours?

And there are a some other things in that thread that really provoke a WTF - including some extremely inconsistent "TO" claims - but I'll stop here for the moment.
Last edited by Ice9 on Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

Ice9 wrote: ... what the hell, ubernoob? Alter Self is broken at any level? Stronger than Wildshape, more broken than Planar Binding, shatters the game more than Genesis? In my universe's version of D&D, the best thing that Alter Self can get you is a good fly speed or a crapload of natural armor. What exactly can it do in yours?
Background: JaronK is saying that because Alter Self can be interpreted to grant you the "spellcasting" ability of a Sorcerer with more levels than you have hit dice through assuming the shape of a Sylph that classes who have Alter Self are vastly more powerful than other characters. And that therefore they deserve to be a higher tier.

He's seriously been going off on that for like several pages. It's as inexplicable as his tirade that the true power of the Factotum has to include their access to Iajitsu Focus, despite the fact that Iajitsu Focus is only available in a 3rd edition setting book that also puts explicit restrictions on available classes that for obvious reasons don't include Factotums (who are in turn available only through an obscure 3.5 location book).

-Username17
Koumei
Serious Badass
Posts: 13902
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: South Ausfailia

Post by Koumei »

What do TO and CO stand for?

Also, since when did Alter Self ever grant Sorcerer spellcasting? I thought it was very specific about only granting a handful of things, all of them purely physical. It sounds like we're not even talking about "depends how you interpret it" or "Yeah, Polymorph rules are confusing so you could slide it past the DM", but actual "No, you can't do this, just as you can't fly by waving a bastard sword in the air."
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

Koumei wrote:What do TO and CO stand for?
"Theoretical Optimization" and "Character Optimization." They are both frankly retarded disciplines, but it's an attempt by the old CharOp board crowd to fight the very legitimate charge of irrelevancy. Putting a line in the sad and calling a certain portion of their thought experiments "pure theory" is supposed to put the rest of the work they do back into the realm of "shit you might actually use."
Also, since when did Alter Self ever grant Sorcerer spellcasting? I thought it was very specific about only granting a handful of things, all of them purely physical. It sounds like we're not even talking about "depends how you interpret it" or "Yeah, Polymorph rules are confusing so you could slide it past the DM", but actual "No, you can't do this, just as you can't fly by waving a bastard sword in the air."
The theory goes like this: the introduction of the Polymorph Subtype in Player's Handbook II put the onus on spells in the category (currently just Alter Self, Baleful Polymorph, Polymorph, Polymorph Any Object, and Shapechange) to specify that an ability was not transferred over rather than the other way around. That is, except where otherwise stated you use the creature writeup rather than your character sheet. This has a very few weird implications for strange things that go away, but importantly it means that abilities that have no tags or explanations are explicitly inherited from the creature type when using any of the basic PHB form changing spells.

So since the "spellcasting" ability isn't marked with anything ever, the Polymorph Subtype rules in the PHB II can be said to transfer them to players whenever they change forms using even the lowly Alter Self. So the fact that there ae creatures in monster books who cast as Sorcerers with their hit dice +4 and shit means that you can read the rules to say that a 5th level character can cast a 2nd level spell to gain the ability to cast 4th level spells in addition to whatever else he does.

Now JaronK is also operating with the 15 minute adventuring day paradigm, so even when people tell him point blank that that shit won't fly under any circumstances, he gets defensive and goes back to the old standby of changing into a Troglodyte and getting a +6 Natty Armor bonus for half an hour. Apparently this is supposed to be impressive or something.

Basically it falls into the standard CharOp trap of overvaluing big numbers and undervaluing solving problems. You know what's a better use of a 2nd level spell slot than getting a big natty armor bonus for an encounter or two? Casting a fricking web and wrapping up an entire encounter with melee opponents while your team slaughters them with ranged attacks before they claw their way out.

-Username17
Koumei
Serious Badass
Posts: 13902
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: South Ausfailia

Post by Koumei »

Great, so it seriously IS "It doesn't say I can't fly by waving a bastard sword in the air." And although I like the versatility offered by Alter Self, it does have to compete with Glitterdust and Web (off the top of my head - there may be even better ones).

I knew that they tended to divide their optimisation into "Theoretical, like Pun Pun and we say it works so it does!" and "You can use this in a game". Except there were so many edge cases where some DMs may allow such-and-such and others won't, and so many fuzzy interpretations of rules, and general fail.

It just didn't occur to me that they'd give official abbreviations to them. Oh well, it shows the small downside of not hanging out on the WotC forums any more.
ubernoob
Duke
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:30 am

Post by ubernoob »

FrankTrollman wrote:
Koumei wrote:What do TO and CO stand for?
"Theoretical Optimization" and "Character Optimization." They are both frankly retarded disciplines, but it's an attempt by the old CharOp board crowd to fight the very legitimate charge of irrelevancy. Putting a line in the sad and calling a certain portion of their thought experiments "pure theory" is supposed to put the rest of the work they do back into the realm of "shit you might actually use."

-Username17
Well, I have made quite a few things in my time that were completely legit "let fighters be more on par with casters" handbook type things. That's CO IMO. JaronK just brings out the completely broken rules stretching whenever he can. Frankly, that has no place in real discussion.

Also, banned already.
User avatar
Judging__Eagle
Prince
Posts: 4671
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada

Post by Judging__Eagle »

Who, you? Geez.
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.

While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
ubernoob
Duke
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:30 am

Post by ubernoob »

Judging__Eagle wrote:Who, you? Geez.
Aye.
RandomCasualty2
Prince
Posts: 3295
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 4:22 pm

Post by RandomCasualty2 »

FrankTrollman wrote: "Theoretical Optimization" and "Character Optimization." They are both frankly retarded disciplines, but it's an attempt by the old CharOp board crowd to fight the very legitimate charge of irrelevancy. Putting a line in the sad and calling a certain portion of their thought experiments "pure theory" is supposed to put the rest of the work they do back into the realm of "shit you might actually use."
Not really.

There is definitely a line between "Stuff you may use in a real game" and "Shit no DM is dumb enough to allow." PunPun is an obvious version of the latter, where any sane DM is going nerfslap you the moment he reads 1/4 of your character sheet.
User avatar
Judging__Eagle
Prince
Posts: 4671
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada

Post by Judging__Eagle »

You blockhead. I'm too lazy to do the vitriol posts, I'm more adept at just clawing people when I'm bored (I fall somewhere in the Big Cat, Rotweiller Puppy, Picador Flamewarrior camps I find; I'm no Godzilla/Kung-Fu Fighter/Philosopher like .

Right now, I want to find out if Jaron and I can agree that Barbarians should kick ass in melee.

Maybe I'll learn something and maybe he will to.

For now I want to keep my thoughts and ideas to myself, I'm willing to share what my thoughts on class balance (and other things) are in this case if anyone wants to know.
Last edited by Judging__Eagle on Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.

While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
User avatar
virgil
King
Posts: 6342
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by virgil »

Except the stuff the CharOp people would place many things into the CO column that were basically pure theory as well. All of their builds were level 20, and the vast majority required such in order to function, working like crap until then; making their use a practice in futility as you can practically bet money on a game not starting at level 15+.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
User avatar
Judging__Eagle
Prince
Posts: 4671
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Lake Ontario is in my backyard; Canada

Post by Judging__Eagle »

Ask for Char op for lvl 1, 2, 3, 5 and lvl 10 builds.

Watch 'em squirm.
The Gaming Den; where Mathematics are rigorously applied to Mythology.

While everyone's Philosophy is not in accord, that doesn't mean we're not on board.
User avatar
Psychic Robot
Prince
Posts: 4607
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by Psychic Robot »

ubernoob wrote:
Judging__Eagle wrote:Who, you? Geez.
Aye.
For what?
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:
Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?
You do not seem to do anything.
ubernoob
Duke
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:30 am

Post by ubernoob »

virgileso wrote:Except the stuff the CharOp people would place many things into the CO column that were basically pure theory as well. All of their builds were level 20, and the vast majority required such in order to function, working like crap until then; making their use a practice in futility as you can practically bet money on a game not starting at level 15+.
Those are the builds of... less adept CharOps. The better ones (RT and myself come to mind and carnivore has his occasional moments) build for level X. The worst ones (JaronK) build for level 20 every single time.
Judging__Eagle wrote:Ask for Char op for lvl 1, 2, 3, 5 and lvl 10 builds.

Watch 'em squirm.
Se above. I fricken love it when someone gives a starting level.
Psychic Robot wrote:
ubernoob wrote:
Judging__Eagle wrote:Who, you? Geez.
Aye.
For what?
Flaming I think. I deleted the email after I read it. Cursing and calling JaronK an idiot where the reasons though.

Edit: Damn, JE. You're good.
Last edited by ubernoob on Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Locked