Torchbearer - Kickstarter is UP

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
silva
Duke
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:11 am

Post by silva »

Oops. Thanks You Lost, just corrected it.
The traditional playstyle is, above all else, the style of playing all games the same way, supported by the ambiguity and lack of procedure in the traditional game text. - Eero Tuovinen
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14841
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

silva wrote:
Kaelik wrote:
silva wrote:Oh yeah, if you referring just to 4e then I agree, its the one that most promotes archetypes synergy toward winning challenges.
You are a fucking idiot. No one is talking about 4e either. Not that you would know because you don't actually know the rules to any fucking edition of any game.
Look, friendly advice: The next time you try to offend me with a post devoid of any substance like that, I will put you in the ignore list. Forever. I never called you or anyone else here stupid or other pejorative adjective of any nature. And if you are not able to dispend the same respect and treatment, then youre a zero, a nobody who doesnt deserve my time.

Got it ?
Spoilered for long rant not about the subject of the thread.
Look, friendly advice: If you are going to put everyone on ignore who says mean things to you that you don't want to hear, you should just leave this forum and never come back, because in four months you will have literally everyone who posts on ignore. I mean for fucks sake, right above your post is erik saying that you have a habit of making uniformed incorrect conclusions. Do you know what you call someone who has a habit of making uniformed incorrect conclusions and then sharing them with better informed people? An idiot. erik called you an idiot. He just did it in a way that was too high handed for you to figure out.

I don't care if you put me on your ignore list forever. You are incomprehensibly bad at even figuring out what the actual topic of discussion even is at any point. I mostly only respond to your points in case someone who doesn't actually understand the subject happens across a thread.

I have been temporarily directing my comments at you for this post only for the almost certainly futile effort to help you actually become a vaguely useful poster. So I will now spell out the most critical part:

1) The value of a person or their words has absolutely nothing to do with how nice they are to you. Sometimes people deserve meanness, sometimes it is thrust upon them, but in either case, the person being mean doesn't become wrong just because they are mean, and in particular fact, if you say something stupid, people will call you stupid.

Now, in this thread, talking about incentivizing player behaviour deanrule even quoted directly from the actual book of the edition we are all actually talking about. Right beneath that he said, "While it is theoretically possible that a Wizard could go 20 levels without ever opening his spellbook and still level up his spell mastery that's not a system failure in my opinion."

So unless the edition of D&D you are talking about both includes the exact text he quoted, and has exactly 20 levels of Wizard, then you are wrong, that is not the edition we are talking about. And when you perpetually and purposefully and deliberately pretend to not know which edition of D&D we are talking you are being deceptive and stupid. Don't be deceptive and stupid. Be a moderately intelligent human being and either talk about what we are actually talking about, or don't talk. Or hell, even change the subject, but don't pretend we are talking about something we obviously aren't talking about. And if you are really so absolutely uniformed that you have no idea what the conversation is about.... then fucking don't talk.

And if you dismiss all advice that is prefaced with someone calling you stupid, you will continue to fail to earn my respect. You don't get to show no respect to me by being a stupid liar and then demand I respect you. That is not how it works. You long ago burned all the respect I give to new posters as a matter of courtesy, if you want my respect now you should act in a way that merits it. And protip, I don't give a fuck about fucking politeness on the internet. I respect Frank, but he is an uncompromising asshole to people who he thinks are wrong, including me and the many times he has called me an idiot. I respect deanrule/DSM similarly. Because calling me an idiot doesn't fucking matter to me, and being a stupid liar does. So stop being a stupid liar, and I will respect you, and consequently, call you stupid substantially less. I will dispense the same respect you show me when you show me respect.

Moral subjectivity is a bitch isn't it.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
User avatar
erik
King
Posts: 5868
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by erik »

Hey, maybe I'm just on the perma-ignore list already. It only seems fair.
Kaelik wrote:erik called you an idiot. He just did it in a way that was too high handed for you to figure out.
I have a policy against using forum quotations in signatures, but you sorely tempt me sir.
User avatar
silva
Duke
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:11 am

Post by silva »

Well, you asked for it. And frankly, I wont lose anything because your posts are all pure ad hominems anyway.

And oh, dont bother replying to this, because you will already be on ignore. ;)
Last edited by silva on Sun Mar 16, 2014 4:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14841
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

silva wrote:Well, you asked for it.
No, I recommended you learn to differentiate content from tone. Too bad you missed all the content of my post because you can't see through tone then huh? I think this even counts as real irony.
silva wrote:And frankly, I wont lose anything because your posts are all pure ad hominems anyway.
You should probably figure out what an ad hominem actually is. Hint: calling someone stupid is usually not an ad hominem.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
User avatar
Dean
Duke
Posts: 2059
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 3:14 am

Post by Dean »

Honest non-mean advice Silva. I suggest not ignoring Kaelik. I think that would be bad for you. I don't think any other poster more perfectly personifies the Den than Kaelik. He is very aggressive, he swears a lot, and he usually opens his counterarguments by calling you moron. He is also very analytically intelligent, a strong debater, and correct about most positions he chooses to argue. His credibility has been proven enough that if I find myself arguing with him I double check myself, I reread and check to see if I'm still confident before continuing. He's a strong thinker and if you can develop the skin to be able to argue with him then you can get a lot out of this board. Kaelik, conceptually, is sort of like a gatekeeper between the way this board operates compared to others. The Den can do great things for you; it can make you a better critical thinker and a better debater but the price to pay for that is people will be mean to you, they'll tell you when you're wrong. If you can't handle the concepts of the board that let Kaelik do what he does then you will eventually go back to other boards where people are much more kind but much more wrong.
DSMatticus wrote:Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. I am filled with an unfathomable hatred.
...You Lost Me
Duke
Posts: 1854
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:21 am

Post by ...You Lost Me »

This might be one of the more touching pages to ever grace the forums.
DSMatticus wrote:Again, look at this fucking map you moron. Take your finger and trace each country's coast, then trace its claim line. Even you - and I say that as someone who could not think less of your intelligence - should be able to tell that one of these things is not like the other.
Kaelik wrote:I invented saying mean things about Tussock.
DSMatticus
King
Posts: 5271
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am

Post by DSMatticus »

I'm 90% sure Kaelik has the internet equivalent of resting bitchface and sounds super confrontational even when he's acting civil, which combined with his actual dickishness gives him a terrible rep.

Though he's being a dick here, definitely. A completely justified dick.
User avatar
silva
Duke
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:11 am

Post by silva »

Dean, I dont mind people being honest and telling me Im wrong. But I do mind people being unnecessarily offensive and insulting. I have a life. I have real problems in my life. I come to the net to have a fun time talking about things I like with people I respect. I dont need to accept that kind of treatment, specially when a tool like "ignore" is so easy to use. I come here because I find a lot of people nice to discuss and with good ideas (even if I dont agree with all of them), not to get even more pissed, specially not from cowards who defend themselves behind the screen (thats my opinion on unnecessarily offensive people on the internet - they are cowards that get trashed in real life and come here because this is the only way than can get gratuitously aggressive without having their butt kicked). If that means eventually I will get out of here ? Dont know, time will tell. But I had enough of this kind of attitude. And Im not the only one, in fact, I heard TheNotoriousAMP and cyberzombie telling the same thing just the other day.

(anyway, I know I will probably un-ignore Kaelik as soon as I cool down my nerves. But right now I cant hear 1 more word from him )
The traditional playstyle is, above all else, the style of playing all games the same way, supported by the ambiguity and lack of procedure in the traditional game text. - Eero Tuovinen
User avatar
silva
Duke
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 12:11 am

Post by silva »

Aryxbez wrote:Optimization isn't a "bad" thing, it's only bad if it's disruptive to the game, and that's likely not of Optimization itself, but the lack of communication with the group. Such as, play D&D, decided to play at "Fighter-level", but a new guy brings in a "Wizard-level" character, or a "Capt Hobo" to a Superhero game (or playing at Hawkeye level, and someone brings in a superman).
Agree, youre right. I stand corrected.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14841
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

silva wrote:from cowards who defend themselves behind the screen (thats my opinion on unnecessarily offensive people on the internet - they are cowards that get trashed in real life and come here because this is the only way than can get gratuitously aggressive without having their butt kicked).
If you don't see how this is an incredibly stupid and offensive thing to say, you should really try being less of an asshole. At least I only call people an asshole for things they actually say, instead of made up stupid prejudice.

Though by the way, I genuinely feel sorry for you or the unfortunate victim if you have ever actually experienced people being physically assaulted because someone didn't like what they say. Being mean is perfectly acceptable in a wide variety of situations, but physical violence rarely is, and if you experience so much of it that you think all the mean people on the internet (read any youtube comment thread) are all being physically assaulted, then I feel really bad for you.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
mlangsdorf
Master
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:12 pm

Post by mlangsdorf »

silva wrote:Look, friendly advice: The next time you try to offend me with a post devoid of any substance like that, I will put you in the ignore list. Forever. I never called you or anyone else here stupid or other pejorative adjective of any nature. And if you are not able to dispend the same respect and treatment, then youre a zero, a nobody who doesnt deserve my time.
silva wrote:(anyway, I know I will probably un-ignore Kaelik as soon as I cool down my nerves. But right now I cant hear 1 more word from him )
So are you a man of your word or are you an indecisive ass who comes in swearing thunder and blood, gets called on his bluff, and folds like a paper fan?

I don't have a dog in this fight, but it's pathetic to make that kind of threat and then offer to renege on it within 24 hours.
fectin
Prince
Posts: 3760
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:54 am

Post by fectin »

No. If you say something foolish, you should walk away from it.

Don't be commit to foolishness forever based on a moment of foolishness. Then, next time, don't say foolish things in the first place.
Vebyast wrote:Here's a fun target for Major Creation: hydrazine. One casting every six seconds at CL9 gives you a bit more than 40 liters per second, which is comparable to the flow rates of some small, but serious, rocket engines. Six items running at full blast through a well-engineered engine will put you, and something like 50 tons of cargo, into space. Alternatively, if you thrust sideways, you will briefly be a fireball screaming across the sky at mach 14 before you melt from atmospheric friction.
Cyberzombie
Knight-Baron
Posts: 742
Joined: Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:12 am

Post by Cyberzombie »

silva wrote:Dean, I dont mind people being honest and telling me Im wrong. But I do mind people being unnecessarily offensive and insulting. I have a life. I have real problems in my life. I come to the net to have a fun time talking about things I like with people I respect. I dont need to accept that kind of treatment, specially when a tool like "ignore" is so easy to use. I come here because I find a lot of people nice to discuss and with good ideas (even if I dont agree with all of them), not to get even more pissed, specially not from cowards who defend themselves behind the screen (thats my opinion on unnecessarily offensive people on the internet - they are cowards that get trashed in real life and come here because this is the only way than can get gratuitously aggressive without having their butt kicked). If that means eventually I will get out of here ? Dont know, time will tell. But I had enough of this kind of attitude. And Im not the only one, in fact, I heard TheNotoriousAMP and cyberzombie telling the same thing just the other day.

(anyway, I know I will probably un-ignore Kaelik as soon as I cool down my nerves. But right now I cant hear 1 more word from him )
I have Kaelik on ignore too. From my limited experience with him, I found him incapable of having any kind of debate without resorting to his lame internet tough guy persona and calling people a bunch of insults he learned from his days in the 4th grade.
User avatar
codeGlaze
Duke
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 9:38 pm

Post by codeGlaze »

Cyberzombie wrote:I have Kaelik on ignore too. From my limited experience with him, I found him incapable of having any kind of debate without resorting to his lame internet tough guy persona and calling people a bunch of insults he learned from his days in the 4th grade.
Then you're probably missing the points he makes because you don't like his language. More often than not he's making a pretty sound point.

...just not in a "nice" way.

Actually... I wonder if there's an extension already out there that'll filter in hilarious replacements for profanity.
Last edited by codeGlaze on Mon Mar 17, 2014 2:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

Well, I broke down and ended up buying the Torchbearer Book + PDF bundle. I'm so fucking ashamed of myself.

At any rate, I skimmed the book and my old post and I still maintain most of what I said when I read someone else's copy. But, fuck it, I think that this book deserves a full-on Faux-OSSR Review. My very first, come to think. This game is fucked up in a lot of ways but it's fucked up in ways you generally don't see in TTRPGs. So hopefully it'll be more interesting than raking WoD or 3E/4E D&D over the coals one more time. And there's still old-school stupidity to it that was mentioned in previous posts in this very thread.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
Post Reply