Page 64 of 140

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:30 pm
by Maxus
Not inherently political, so...
Rationalwiki wrote: Bitcoin halves in value as China further restricts its use. Reddit /r/bitcoin sticky-posts the US suicide hotline.

Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2013 6:04 pm
by name_here
What was this about Bitcoin being immune to influence by nation-states?

Posted: Sat Dec 21, 2013 6:54 pm
by Josh_Kablack
So, I know I shouldn't laugh at a school molestation case, but
the name of the accused is right out of a juvenile dirty joke.

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:48 am
by erik
I'd heard about the Silk Road bitcoin shenanigans, but only tangentially reading about it. So this is a bit delayed by a month. Zang. Psychopath is psycho.

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 5:02 am
by name_here
That is an impressive combination of meticulous and incompetent. Seriously, he put a hit out on someone and paid up without waiting for them to be reported dead?

Posted: Wed Dec 25, 2013 9:58 pm
by Ancient History

Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2013 9:02 pm
by hyzmarca
FrankTrollman wrote:
Maj wrote:Asshole extorts money from victims of his revenge porn site.
I genuinely don't understand the revenge porn thing. I understand the stuff where porn stars pretend to be amateurs or underage or whatever. Hell, I even understand the people who take pictures of sexy ladies on the street and share those around (although that's creepy and you shouldn't do it). Heck, I even understand the people who take "upskirt" photos, although that one is probably illegal and in any case a gross invasion of privacy. We've all seen attractive people on the street and "having sex with a random attractive person on the street" seems like a fantasy that enough people would have for there to be a market to fill.

But revenge porn? It's just pictures of people that are posted without their permission. That's the whole thing. The only thing that makes it different from any other amateur or professional pornography is that it is of ambiguous copyright ownership and quite possibly obtained illegally. That's it. Other than being quite possibly against the law and clearly unethical to distribute, it's not in any way distinct from any other form of porn.

That being said, the quasi-illegal nature of the thing is the entire thing. The only claim to fame they have is that they are probably breaking the law. And the only reason such sites can operate without being shut down by the cops is that it's really hard to prove copyright infringement on unregistered personal photos. So it seems like a really bad plan for those people to unambiguously break laws by posting photos of underage girls or attempting to extort money from people. Because those are not legal gray areas and it's really hard to hide in the law's lint trap.

And yet... here we are.

-Username17
No one does revenge porn to get off. They do it to hurt women that they don't like. And other guys look at it to cheer them on about hurting women. That's the whole point. To cause real emotional damage to real women. It's understandable when you get that these guys are angry passive-aggressive misogynists who are too chickenshit to physically attack their ex-girlfriends due to fear of arrest or possibly being beaten up instead.

Revenge porn as a concept is disgusting to me in a very visceral manner and incites a real desire to do violence to the people responsible, but I do understand their motivations. They're cowards who want to emotionally torture women. That's it.

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 12:41 am
by Kaelik
hyzmarca wrote:No one does revenge porn to get off. They do it to hurt women that they don't like. And other guys look at it to cheer them on about hurting women. That's the whole point. To cause real emotional damage to real women. It's understandable when you get that these guys are angry passive-aggressive misogynists who are too chickenshit to physically attack their ex-girlfriends due to fear of arrest or possibly being beaten up instead.

Revenge porn as a concept is disgusting to me in a very visceral manner and incites a real desire to do violence to the people responsible, but I do understand their motivations. They're cowards who want to emotionally torture women. That's it.
Dude, no one is confused about the people who put up the porn, the people you wrote two paragraphs about. People are confused about the people who look at it, the people you wrote one sentence about.

And that part is not very well thought out. Are you really telling me that people google porn sites in order to write comments about how some other guy was in the right to hurt some woman? That seems, beyond unlikely. I really don't see why they wouldn't just go to a misogynist forum to do that.

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:05 am
by hyzmarca
Kaelik wrote:
hyzmarca wrote:No one does revenge porn to get off. They do it to hurt women that they don't like. And other guys look at it to cheer them on about hurting women. That's the whole point. To cause real emotional damage to real women. It's understandable when you get that these guys are angry passive-aggressive misogynists who are too chickenshit to physically attack their ex-girlfriends due to fear of arrest or possibly being beaten up instead.

Revenge porn as a concept is disgusting to me in a very visceral manner and incites a real desire to do violence to the people responsible, but I do understand their motivations. They're cowards who want to emotionally torture women. That's it.
Dude, no one is confused about the people who put up the porn, the people you wrote two paragraphs about. People are confused about the people who look at it, the people you wrote one sentence about.

And that part is not very well thought out. Are you really telling me that people google porn sites in order to write comments about how some other guy was in the right to hurt some woman? That seems, beyond unlikely. I really don't see why they wouldn't just go to a misogynist forum to do that.
Revenge porn sites generally put up the names, addresses, and phone numbers. You can call up the women you see and harass them over the phone. It's interactive.

Posted: Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:33 am
by Maxus
hyzmarca wrote:
Kaelik wrote:
hyzmarca wrote:No one does revenge porn to get off. They do it to hurt women that they don't like. And other guys look at it to cheer them on about hurting women. That's the whole point. To cause real emotional damage to real women. It's understandable when you get that these guys are angry passive-aggressive misogynists who are too chickenshit to physically attack their ex-girlfriends due to fear of arrest or possibly being beaten up instead.

Revenge porn as a concept is disgusting to me in a very visceral manner and incites a real desire to do violence to the people responsible, but I do understand their motivations. They're cowards who want to emotionally torture women. That's it.
Dude, no one is confused about the people who put up the porn, the people you wrote two paragraphs about. People are confused about the people who look at it, the people you wrote one sentence about.

And that part is not very well thought out. Are you really telling me that people google porn sites in order to write comments about how some other guy was in the right to hurt some woman? That seems, beyond unlikely. I really don't see why they wouldn't just go to a misogynist forum to do that.
Revenge porn sites generally put up the names, addresses, and phone numbers. You can call up the women you see and harass them over the phone. It's interactive.
I was going to stay out of this. But yes: There are revenge porn sites which do that. There are misogynist forums and sites which delight in this. I direct your attention to this blog, Man Boobz, in which a man, who has earned his place in Heaven through his patience and self-sacrifice in collating this shit, reports and mocks misogyny. The linked article is about a revenge porn site.

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 1:44 am
by Whipstitch
Interactivity aside, being part of a group, audience or fandom feels legitimate in a way that being a lone whackjob does not. Just knowing that there's other assholes willing to pull this kinda bullshit likely helps a fair number of dudes feel more justified in their actions.

Posted: Tue Dec 31, 2013 10:25 pm
by Maj

Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 6:08 am
by Grek
So, assuming the court had ruled the other way... who at the DVLA appoints the champions for trial by combat?

Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:47 am
by Meikle641
Managers who hate their interns. Or they hire chavs, I'd think.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:52 pm
by name_here
http://hplusmagazine.com/2010/02/11/scr ... shumanism/

Dammit, now I want to do this but am not up for self-surgury.

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:42 pm
by Chamomile
Couldn't you get the same basic utility by just keeping the same sort of chip on a necklace or something?

Posted: Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:12 pm
by Kaelik
Chamomile wrote:Couldn't you get the same basic utility by just keeping the same sort of chip on a necklace or something?
Well not the super power to see where electric fields are and know what is running granted by installing magnets in your body.

A super power which I tremendously doubt this you can gain from installing magnets in your body.

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 12:19 am
by name_here
Chamomile wrote:Couldn't you get the same basic utility by just keeping the same sort of chip on a necklace or something?
Then you'd need to keep track of the necklace, and I have a hard enough time keeping track of my glasses.
Well not the super power to see where electric fields are and know what is running granted by installing magnets in your body.

A super power which I tremendously doubt this you can gain from installing magnets in your body.
Apparently you can. I don't think it would work with DC circuits, though, except while they're changing state.

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 12:24 am
by DSMatticus
That actually sounds plausible. Not as in "this guy totally did it," but as in "that is a thing you could probably do in basically the manner described if you really wanted to."

Slap your phone down next to your speakers and give yourself a ring or text. If your speakers are anything like mine, they did something super obnoxious. You get to notice the interference with your puny human ears because the device in question is a speaker, but the change was caused by the phone fucking with the electronics inside the speaker. Now, I don't actually know if the activity caused in the speaker by the phone is strong enough that you would be able to "feel" it by sticking your finger inside the speakers. But I do know that if you could feel it by sticking your finger inside the electronics, then you'd almost certainly be able to feel it by sticking the electronics inside your finger. And, of course, because nothing is 100% efficient you'll also get heat and motion and so on that you might feel.

Ninja'd.

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 12:29 am
by Foxwarrior
The important question is: couldn't you get essentially the same effect by taping the magnet to the outside of your finger instead?

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 12:44 am
by Koumei
Yes. One guy found that simply wearing a jacket with a bunch of magnets on it was enough.

Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 4:25 am
by DSMatticus
Foxwarrior wrote:The important question is: couldn't you get essentially the same effect by taping the magnet to the outside of your finger instead?
Walking around with magnets taped to your hands makes you weird. Walking around with magnets inside your hands makes you a cyborg.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 1:52 am
by Ancient History

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:57 am
by Cynic
Shia Labeouf decides to out and out right plagiarize shit and then does his homework by taking part in an interview to which he gives answers that are basically from everybody but him.

Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:33 am
by Maj
Cynic wrote:Shia Labeouf decides to out and out right plagiarize shit and then does his homework by taking part in an interview to which he gives answers that are basically from everybody but him.
It's like he's a hollow shell that walks and talks.