technomancer at [unixtime wrote:1189423309[/unixtime]]If motives are what matters, then how does anything that is mindless have an alignment other than neutral?
You raise a good point but I would take it one step beyond (just a few seconds before I take it one step backwards). A mindless anything cannot have an alignment at all. It's alignment should be "-".
So let's think of a mindless something as merely a tool. Can a tool be "evil?" Yes, but not in the sense it has an evil alignmet. A tool can be desiged to be the extension of the will of the creator. Evil creators might make tools that are etensions of the creator's evil will. So just like you can have a magic item that is [evil] you can have a creature be [evil] while not per se having an evil alignment.
Example: Suppose I create a skeleton and give it the command "kill all humans." (Assume for the moment I'm not human otherwise it's going to try to kill me right on the spot.) Clearly it's not killing humans for its own personal gain, it's killing humans because I commanded it to do so. The motives are in fact evil ... but they are my motives, not the tool that I have created.
(This of course avoids the standard argument that undead creatures somehow get "evil cooties" because the process of creating undead is evil. That's plain bullshit, and I won't even try to rationalize that stupid idea. Consider Frankenstien's Monster in Van Helsing. The church tried to use this same argument to justify why they wanted Van Helsing to destroy the monster, but Van Helsing saw through the fallicy and realized it is how someone is not how they were created that either justifies or condemns them and thus he allowed the monster to escape.)