Personally, I rarely go into women's restrooms, so anecdotally most of my personal "disgusting restroom" stories are of men's bathrooms. However, just looking at the lines to get into restrooms tells me that it is completely routine to make female restrooms which are grossly inadequate to actual needs.ishy wrote:So which are better, female or male restrooms?FrankTrollman wrote:History has shown that when architects make things for the privileged and the unprivileged, they do tend to skimp a bit on the things made for the unprivileged. The women's elevator is not going to go directly from the lobby to the rooms, because that is where the manavator goes. Just as black people in the fifties didn't get equal schools, equal water fountains, or equal seating in restaurants, if we segregate things for women they will not be equal.
-Username17
There are various excuses given of course. It is objectively true that urinals are more efficient in terms of time and space than stalls are, and more men can pee in an amount of time over the same square meterage than women can. But regardless, it is also objectively true that is extremely common for theaters, restaurants, and stadiums to provide adequate men's toilet services and inadequate women's toilets.
And if you think that a world with men's and women's elevators wouldn't have adequate elevators for men and inadequate elevators for women, your fantasy world is itself in a fantasy world.
-Username17