4e errata is ridiculous.

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

A Man In Black
Duke
Posts: 1040
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:33 am

Post by A Man In Black »

Whipstitch wrote:I referenced a legit power level errata already. Implying that power level errata never actually happened is ignorant at best and disingenuous at worst. They were using power level errata until '06 or '07 or so. They printed articles about power level errata and then they further explained why they moved away from using power level errata. For most of Magic's history power level errata was a thing that happened. It's trivially easy to google, so you may as well get in line behind ice9 to drop the subject.
It's worth mentioning why they stopped doing power level errata: because it was too much of a headache to keep track of and required players to memorize how the cards had changed from the versions printed.

A game that ended up collapsing under the weight of its own errata was the original Star Wars CCG. After about 10 sets, the errata document was a pretty thick booklet, and it was a major obstacle to just buying cards and starting to play. Especially since sets didn't sunset in that game: the only playing environment was basically "Type 1".
Last edited by A Man In Black on Tue Oct 04, 2011 2:10 am, edited 2 times in total.
I wish in the past I had tried more things 'cause now I know that being in trouble is a fake idea
User avatar
Whipstitch
Prince
Posts: 3660
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:23 pm

Post by Whipstitch »

I can definitely agree with that sentiment. It's just dithering about how much errata we can actually remember that hits me as a non-starter and a distraction.
Post Reply