[Non-political] News that makes you Laugh/Cry/Both...
Moderator: Moderators
I saw that one on the Cracked article, and all I could really think is how that would combo so well with monster toys, to horrify people with a dinosaur head sticking out of her belly or whatever. An Alien chestburster might be too easy (and a monster that is a metaphor for the horrors of pregnancy in a pregnancy-themed doll kind of defeats the purpose).
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
Round these here parts, computer engineers are the people who make computers and computer scientists are the people who program computers. That is what the people who name diplomas have decreed.fectin wrote: This specific point though, is mistaken:Computer engineers generally like to code. Generally their job is to architect.Chamomile wrote:A computer engineer's job is to actually engineer the computers.
DSMatticus wrote:It's not just that everything you say is stupid, but that they are Gordian knots of stupid that leave me completely bewildered as to where to even begin. After hearing you speak Alexander the Great would stab you and triumphantly declare the puzzle solved.
Actually, you might be looking for Software Engineer.
virgil wrote:Lovecraft didn't later add a love triangle between Dagon, Chtulhu, & the Colour-Out-of-Space; only to have it broken up through cyber-bullying by the King in Yellow.
FrankTrollman wrote:If your enemy is fucking Gravity, are you helping or hindering it by putting things on high shelves? I don't fucking know! That's not even a thing. Your enemy can't be Gravity, because that's stupid.
Could well be.
Either way, "engineer" usually implies design, not execution.
Either way, "engineer" usually implies design, not execution.
Vebyast wrote:Here's a fun target for Major Creation: hydrazine. One casting every six seconds at CL9 gives you a bit more than 40 liters per second, which is comparable to the flow rates of some small, but serious, rocket engines. Six items running at full blast through a well-engineered engine will put you, and something like 50 tons of cargo, into space. Alternatively, if you thrust sideways, you will briefly be a fireball screaming across the sky at mach 14 before you melt from atmospheric friction.
Surely you jest:fectin wrote:On the larger point, I'll note that there are four people total in Barbie's world.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ ... and_family
Game On,
fbmf
As someone whose major is actually called software engineering I can tell you that software engineer, software developer, programmer and coder are all valid things to call someone who writes the code, with the last one meaning just that and the first one extending to include low-level management positions.TiaC wrote:Actually, you might be looking for Software Engineer.
Last edited by schpeelah on Thu Nov 20, 2014 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
O brave new world, That has such people in't.fbmf wrote:Surely you jest:fectin wrote:On the larger point, I'll note that there are four people total in Barbie's world.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ ... and_family
Game On,
fbmf
Vebyast wrote:Here's a fun target for Major Creation: hydrazine. One casting every six seconds at CL9 gives you a bit more than 40 liters per second, which is comparable to the flow rates of some small, but serious, rocket engines. Six items running at full blast through a well-engineered engine will put you, and something like 50 tons of cargo, into space. Alternatively, if you thrust sideways, you will briefly be a fireball screaming across the sky at mach 14 before you melt from atmospheric friction.
Tangent: if you can learn actual engineering before you graduate, you should do that.schpeelah wrote:As someone whose major is actually called software engineering I can tell you that software engineer, software developer, programmer and coder are all valid things to call someone who writes the code, with the last one meaning just that and the first one extending to include low-level management positions.TiaC wrote:Actually, you might be looking for Software Engineer.
That's not a put-down: I also majored in engineering, and was only even exposed to actual engineering by fortunate chance. I don't think I've ever met anyone who learned it as an undergrad.
Vebyast wrote:Here's a fun target for Major Creation: hydrazine. One casting every six seconds at CL9 gives you a bit more than 40 liters per second, which is comparable to the flow rates of some small, but serious, rocket engines. Six items running at full blast through a well-engineered engine will put you, and something like 50 tons of cargo, into space. Alternatively, if you thrust sideways, you will briefly be a fireball screaming across the sky at mach 14 before you melt from atmospheric friction.
What do you mean by "actual engineering"? That sounds kind of broad. Just my curiosity, it's my final year and I run out of non-bullshit courses to sign up for anyway.fectin wrote:Tangent: if you can learn actual engineering before you graduate, you should do that.
That's not a put-down: I also majored in engineering, and was only even exposed to actual engineering by fortunate chance. I don't think I've ever met anyone who learned it as an undergrad.
- Ancient History
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 12708
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm
If you want a job in engineering, it is highly recommended to get an internship somewhere before you graduate, so you at least get a taste of what you're in for.schpeelah wrote:What do you mean by "actual engineering"? That sounds kind of broad. Just my curiosity, it's my final year and I run out of non-bullshit courses to sign up for anyway.fectin wrote:Tangent: if you can learn actual engineering before you graduate, you should do that.
That's not a put-down: I also majored in engineering, and was only even exposed to actual engineering by fortunate chance. I don't think I've ever met anyone who learned it as an undergrad.
- Stahlseele
- King
- Posts: 5977
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:51 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
She was asking for it, wearing that red shirt dress.
It clashes horribly with the other colours after all.
It clashes horribly with the other colours after all.
Welcome, to IronHell.
Shrapnel wrote:TFwiki wrote:Soon is the name of the region in the time-domain (familiar to all marketing departments, and to the moderators and staff of Fun Publications) which sees release of all BotCon news, club exclusives, and other fan desirables. Soon is when then will become now.
Peculiar properties of spacetime ensure that the perception of the magnitude of Soon is fluid and dependent, not on an individual's time-reference, but on spatial and cultural location. A marketer generally perceives Soon as a finite, known, yet unspeakable time-interval; to a fan, the interval appears greater, and may in fact approach the infinite, becoming Never. Once the interval has passed, however, a certain time-lensing effect seems to occur, and the time-interval becomes vanishingly small. We therefore see the strange result that the same fragment of spacetime may be observed, in quick succession, as Soon, Never, and All Too Quickly.
Sort of borderline, but... eh.
Time's bullshit words to ban thing including Feminsim has led to...
#FeministPrincessBride
Time's bullshit words to ban thing including Feminsim has led to...
#FeministPrincessBride
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.
You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
One, the word was Feminist (and the author explained why)Prak wrote:Sort of borderline, but... eh.
Time's bullshit words to ban thing including Feminsim has led to...
#FeministPrincessBride
Two, no one really gave a shit about Time's Ban List in prior years. Hell, this years list had bossy on it. So pretty much a lot of people got mad over a list that doesn't matter.
Koumei wrote:I'm just glad that Jill Stein stayed true to her homeopathic principles by trying to win with .2% of the vote. She just hasn't diluted it enough!
Koumei wrote:I am disappointed in Santorum: he should carry his dead election campaign to term!
Just a heads up... Your post is pregnant... When you miss that many periods it's just a given.
]I want him to tongue-punch my box.
The divine in me says the divine in you should go fuck itself.
Yeah, I really couldn't give less of a shit about Time's wordban list. I just find the Princess Bride feminism quotes amusing.
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.
You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
Buckle up; it's a three-drink rant:
My first exposure was on my senior project. I've posted bits of it here before; I developed a histology technique to get sequential 10-mil cross-sectional slices of nerves, and built a software package to reconstruct 3D models of that nerve from the slices. It showed some neat features. One of the grad students even wanted to use it for his signal propagation models. Cool, right?
So then I went to write up a summary of it, and quickly hit a wall. What was the scope of my project (i.e., what parts should I be graded on?). Was it just the software? Was it just the histology? Was it producing a complete feline sciatic model (which I failed to do - out of time)? While I was obviously flailing around near something valuable, I had no actual goal (my adviser tried to warn me actually, then let me fail, then helped me rescue it at the end).
Without specific and concrete criteria for success, success is unpossible. You can see the same thing show up in many, many RPGs, actually: no design goals always precludes success.
But it's not just that. Setting and fulfilling requirements is the sine qua non of engineering, but there's a whole craft for how you get from one to the other. I think you mentioned that you're learning software. You've probably worked some in groups. If not, you will. Consider, how would you coordinate the efforts of a dozen different people on the same project? Coding is a real skill, and an art besides, but engineering is taking a poorly defined project, making it concrete, and breaking it into pieces that can be solved individually, then voltroned to an acceptable overall solution.
I think software is actually an easier entry than most. You're already primed to think about interfaces and architectures, so it really should be a clean extension of what you already know.
"Co-op" is usually better, because it implies getting paid and doing useful work, but that's just a different jargon.
edit: also, if you can find a copy of "the unwritten laws of engineering," it's very worth reading. It's not technical, but it's good advice and can save you some heartache.
Engineering is fundamentally about taking interesting and difficult problems to be solvable, breaking them them down into boring problems, breaking those down into trivial tasks, executing those tasks, then showing that those tasks roll up to solve the interesting problem. The skills you're probably learning are fundamental to that process in the way that dribbling and passing are fundamental to basketball, but are likewise only part of a greater whole.schpeelah wrote:What do you mean by "actual engineering"? That sounds kind of broad. Just my curiosity, it's my final year and I run out of non-bullshit courses to sign up for anyway.fectin wrote:Tangent: if you can learn actual engineering before you graduate, you should do that.
That's not a put-down: I also majored in engineering, and was only even exposed to actual engineering by fortunate chance. I don't think I've ever met anyone who learned it as an undergrad.
My first exposure was on my senior project. I've posted bits of it here before; I developed a histology technique to get sequential 10-mil cross-sectional slices of nerves, and built a software package to reconstruct 3D models of that nerve from the slices. It showed some neat features. One of the grad students even wanted to use it for his signal propagation models. Cool, right?
So then I went to write up a summary of it, and quickly hit a wall. What was the scope of my project (i.e., what parts should I be graded on?). Was it just the software? Was it just the histology? Was it producing a complete feline sciatic model (which I failed to do - out of time)? While I was obviously flailing around near something valuable, I had no actual goal (my adviser tried to warn me actually, then let me fail, then helped me rescue it at the end).
Without specific and concrete criteria for success, success is unpossible. You can see the same thing show up in many, many RPGs, actually: no design goals always precludes success.
But it's not just that. Setting and fulfilling requirements is the sine qua non of engineering, but there's a whole craft for how you get from one to the other. I think you mentioned that you're learning software. You've probably worked some in groups. If not, you will. Consider, how would you coordinate the efforts of a dozen different people on the same project? Coding is a real skill, and an art besides, but engineering is taking a poorly defined project, making it concrete, and breaking it into pieces that can be solved individually, then voltroned to an acceptable overall solution.
I think software is actually an easier entry than most. You're already primed to think about interfaces and architectures, so it really should be a clean extension of what you already know.
This is also good advice.Ancient History wrote:If you want a job in engineering, it is highly recommended to get an internship somewhere before you graduate, so you at least get a taste of what you're in for.
"Co-op" is usually better, because it implies getting paid and doing useful work, but that's just a different jargon.
edit: also, if you can find a copy of "the unwritten laws of engineering," it's very worth reading. It's not technical, but it's good advice and can save you some heartache.
Last edited by fectin on Fri Nov 21, 2014 2:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Ancient History
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 12708
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm
I, on the other hand, am in the software engineering equivalent of "breaking big rocks into little rocks." Most of my work is where they give me the cases where something's wrong, there's insufficient technical documentation because the hardware is old as shit and they never bought the data package, and I figure out what it is, write a report, fix it, and write another report.
[/edit]And for my senior design project, going into the final week my hardware shat itself and died because the stupid RadioShack plug-in-the-wall adaptor I bought started spitting out AC and fried my chips. And I still came in 3rd place out of fifty students, because I knew what the fuck I was talking about.
[/edit]And for my senior design project, going into the final week my hardware shat itself and died because the stupid RadioShack plug-in-the-wall adaptor I bought started spitting out AC and fried my chips. And I still came in 3rd place out of fifty students, because I knew what the fuck I was talking about.
Last edited by Ancient History on Fri Nov 21, 2014 2:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- King
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am
The decision to add feminist was absolutely offensive. It reeks of "stop whining about how you're getting shit on" and "the woman's body has ways to shut that whole thing down." The reality is that the past few years have not been kind to women in the United States (what with a bunch of state governments going red), and if anything now is the time to pick up that particular banner and shove it up some conservative assholes like it's a transvaginal ultrasound wand and they're pregnant in Texas.Leress wrote:One, the word was Feminist (and the author explained why)Prak wrote:Sort of borderline, but... eh.
Time's bullshit words to ban thing including Feminsim has led to...
#FeministPrincessBride
Two, no one really gave a shit about Time's Ban List in prior years. Hell, this years list had bossy on it. So pretty much a lot of people got mad over a list that doesn't matter.
The reason that feminist was even on that list was to get clicks. Hell the reason the list was even mentioned was that feminist was getting over 50% of the vote ( which makes the outrage that much greater and probably done to troll the poll). The last 3 polls had very few comments and the winner had around 25% of the vote.
This is non-fire to put out. The author's reason for putting it on the poll was just a dumb as all the other reasons that the other words on are the poll. A way to put more clickbait in a place to be noticed.
Side note: Yes the #FeministPrincessBride pics are funny.
This is non-fire to put out. The author's reason for putting it on the poll was just a dumb as all the other reasons that the other words on are the poll. A way to put more clickbait in a place to be noticed.
Side note: Yes the #FeministPrincessBride pics are funny.
Last edited by Leress on Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Koumei wrote:I'm just glad that Jill Stein stayed true to her homeopathic principles by trying to win with .2% of the vote. She just hasn't diluted it enough!
Koumei wrote:I am disappointed in Santorum: he should carry his dead election campaign to term!
Just a heads up... Your post is pregnant... When you miss that many periods it's just a given.
]I want him to tongue-punch my box.
The divine in me says the divine in you should go fuck itself.
-
- King
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am
You're not really saying anything. There are words there, yes, but a cohesive point do they not make. Yes, Time wants publicity. Yes, the poll is being trolled by all of the usual suspects. And yes, "alright, shut up about feminism already" is horribly offensive and will likely be horribly offensive for the rest of our lives. Those statements imply fuck all about eachother.
Getting pissed that the people in charge of a major publication think it might be time for feminists to stop talking about feminism at the same time as state legislatures across the country are doing everything they can to make sure women have less rights today than they did four years ago is completely appropriate. Being outraged that the big people don't take little people problems seriously is what outrage is fucking for. The people who say they're sick of hearing about feminism are not good people, and calling them out is exactly what should be done.
Getting pissed that the people in charge of a major publication think it might be time for feminists to stop talking about feminism at the same time as state legislatures across the country are doing everything they can to make sure women have less rights today than they did four years ago is completely appropriate. Being outraged that the big people don't take little people problems seriously is what outrage is fucking for. The people who say they're sick of hearing about feminism are not good people, and calling them out is exactly what should be done.
You're right, Leress, putting feminism in the Time poll was just clickbait. Except, what do you mean by "just" clickbait? If the past few months have shown me anything, it's that everyone everywhere should despise clickbait as the perverse bizarro world journalism that it is. And I don't mean despise the way you despise reality television where you publicly mock it when it comes up but also condone and possibly even support it in actual action. I mean that methods which are explicitly dishonest are the most common and influential means of getting information out there and we should be seriously, genuinely concerned about that because it is a serious political issue.
Man Allegedly Tortured by UK and US for Nearly a Decade Wins Right to Sue Britain
In the future news: Yunus Rahmatullah has lost the case and has to pay the UK government.
In the future news: Yunus Rahmatullah has lost the case and has to pay the UK government.
Not how the UK govt works on such cases. They will/have put up a serious fight to stop the case being heard, to get it thrown out, or to cripple the case by not allowing evidence, but they'd rather concede and lose than fight and lose on the actual evidence.Longes wrote:Man Allegedly Tortured by UK and US for Nearly a Decade Wins Right to Sue Britain
In the future news: Yunus Rahmatullah has lost the case and has to pay the UK government.