Page 103 of 140
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 8:06 am
by Prak
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2015 2:34 pm
by Shrapnel
AWESOME.
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2015 8:21 pm
by Josh_Kablack
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2015 9:25 pm
by RedstoneOrc
Yep it's winter in Texas cause the ice cream truck is making the rounds. Suck it winter
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 10:49 am
by Ancient History
Not safe for work. Also possibly humanity.
Vajankle.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:12 am
by Count Arioch the 28th
Ancient History wrote:Not safe for work. Also possibly humanity.
Vajankle.
Yeah, I'm not going to yuck someone else's yum, but that's a little out there, even by my tastes.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 6:12 pm
by Eikre
I would order one on the condition that the rest of the human body was made available with a range of various genitals to assemble them into a full sex voltron.
The footvag's connected to the shindick. The shindick's connected to the thighbung. The thighbung's connected to the butt-tounge, that that's the song of the something something.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 10:10 pm
by Orion
My only problem with this is that it looks way too much like a severed, bleeding foot. The orifice doesn't look different enough from bone marrow or just the plan old... not femur, but whatever is below the kneed.
Stick that orifice on the side or bottom and I'm fine with this. I feel like that would be more in keeping with the way enthusiasts experience the foot anyway.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:26 pm
by DSMatticus
Yeah, that is a severed foot that happens to be fuckable. That seems less like a sex toy for foot fetishists and more like a sex toy for a serial killer.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 3:24 am
by erik
DSMatticus wrote:Yeah, that is a severed foot that happens to be fuckable. That seems less like a sex toy for foot fetishists and more like a sex toy for a serial killer.
Maybe that's by design since it won't sell like that, they make serial killer sex toys and market em as a foot fetish or somesuch.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:30 am
by Prak
Yeah, there's a japanese toy that is literally the same exact concept, but with the entry point on the bottom, which has been around for a while.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 9:09 pm
by Stahlseele
So, whatsapp can be used via the chrome browser now and all news concerning windows 10 point to it being the bees knees O.o
1 year free upgrade for Win7 and Win8.1 users.
Share Video to X-Box Live Network.
Something like Fraps built into the OS.
Up to 50% more efficient CPU usage gaming using DX12.
Streams X-Box One Games.
Will run on Tablet and Smartphone as well
And MS is working on AR goggles /occulus rift/google glass based on windows 10 as well.
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 2:30 am
by Meikle641
Does it lack the shitty interface of 8?
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 5:25 am
by TarkisFlux
If you mean the start screen, yeah. It looks likely to be replaced by a start menu that can run the live tiles if you care about those things. And all of the metro apps will run windowed on the desktop, like they always should have.
If you're referring to other shitty interface bits, you'll need to be more specific.
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 6:13 am
by Meikle641
Just the start screen. Had the misfortune of experiencing Win8 this week as I installed Steam on my nephew's PC. Gonna see about installing Classic Shell as he doesn't seem to care for the interface either. And assorted other free software.
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 6:52 am
by TarkisFlux
Upgrading to 8.1 update 1 (Fuck that naming scheme btw) may help a bit in the meantime, if he isn't already. Still a full screen start thing, but a much more workable desktop.
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2015 12:41 pm
by Stahlseele
Yes, they are basically doing what they should have done with 8.
A mostly classical desktop on desktop computers that have no touch screen.
The back and forth between the start screen and the classic desktop on hybrid devices.
The start screen on tablets that only have a touch screen.
That's the closest you could have gotten to perfect aside from simply letting people chose what kind of UI they want on their device either on first boot or install <.<
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 8:27 pm
by Ancient History
I don't know if this qualifies as political, or ...what.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/fox- ... hris-kyle/
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 8:54 pm
by Cynic
I didn't know that America in Iraq paved the way for India to bgecome a little les sshitty. Wow....
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 9:00 pm
by Kaelik
I find literally endless amounts of entertainment from people failing to understand a comment that points out their own hypocrisy.
Like, my favorite part: “It’s just funny, though, Michael Moore is now this theologian, citing Jesus in every public statement,” co-host Tucker Carlson opined. “I don’t remember him citing Jesus on abortion or gay marriage, do you?
Uh... you believe Jesus has a strong take on lives, and that we should follow them, Michael Moore bringing up your beliefs does not mean he follows them, and therefore obviously does not mean he needs to bring up your beliefs when you are allegedly acting on them, just when you are obviously not.
I bring this up because I have run into this a fuck ton recently, and it is really fucking hilarious every time that these people apparently are too stupid to even grasp the argument being made at them/joke being made about them.
Along the more focused line of discussion in that piece: MERIKA FUCK YEAH! SAVING THE WORLD WITH OUR POLICING! NO OTHER COUNTRY IS CAPABLE OF POLICING THEMSELVES, THEY ALL RELY ON MERIKA!
Sometimes I wonder if it isn't all part of some brilliant strategy to defeat the concept of satire and parody by just being more stupid than anyone could believe you would be.
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 11:34 pm
by Korgan0
if I remember correctly, the oft-shouted statistics that global inequality and poverty and so on plummeted over the past 50 years or whatever immediately becomes false if you exclude socialist countries, so there's that. I can't find the relevant data, but given the degree to which China and Russia would tilt any hypothetical demographic inquiry, it sounds reasonable.
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 12:51 am
by DSMatticus
Kaelik wrote:Sometimes I wonder if it isn't all part of some brilliant strategy to defeat the concept of satire and parody by just being more stupid than anyone could believe you would be.
Isn't there a poll somewhere that demonstrated exactly that happening? Not the brilliant strategy part, but the part where conservatives are so fucking insane you cannot get people to believe that they've said the things they've actually said.
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 1:28 am
by hyzmarca
Well, snipers are environmentally friendly.
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 6:37 pm
by ishy
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:25 pm
by ishy
I live in a country where possessing, selling, smoking and growing cannabis is technically against the law. But we do have a policy that basically says you're free to smoke, sell and possess it in limited quantities. But you're not allowed to grow it.
Growing cannabis apparently takes a lot of electricity, so people tend to steal it. If they get caught stealing electricity they'll have to pay post factum. But tax free.
So currently, stealing electricity and getting caught is still cheaper than paying for electricity in the place.