Moments when a piece of entertainment completely lost you.

Mundane & Pointless Stuff I Must Share: The Off Topic Forum

Moderator: Moderators

shau
Knight-Baron
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by shau »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:So...

I don't read For Better or For Worse, but what exactly was up with all of the Nerd Rage the past couple of years over Anthony? I mean, you hear language thrown at him people usually reserve for Wesley or Dulcy the Dragon or Elmira.
I don't read it either, but I guess the best explanation of Anthony hat is here http://shaenon.livejournal.com/29475.html. Its from the creator of Narbonic, and she goes after him with the poise and fury of a denner.
Neeeek
Knight-Baron
Posts: 900
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 10:45 am

Post by Neeeek »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:So...

I don't read For Better or For Worse, but what exactly was up with all of the Nerd Rage the past couple of years over Anthony? I mean, you hear language thrown at him people usually reserve for Wesley or Dulcy the Dragon or Elmira.
From what I gather, it was because he left his wife for Elizabeth, because his wife didn't want to have kids, which Anthony knew when he married her. And his leaving his wife was (attempted to be) portrayed as justified and somehow she (the wife) was supposed to be the bad guy. For being cheated on.
Akula
Knight-Baron
Posts: 960
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:06 am
Location: Oakland CA

Post by Akula »

Twain was broke for most of the latter years of his life. He made bad investments and went into debt, and he couldn't write fast enough to pull himself out. That's why a lot of his latter work sucks and the end of Huckleberry Finn seems rushed. It was.
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

It does make me very sad how he died before being able to finish all of his stories.

It also makes me very, very angry how he (or rather his family) had to hide most of what he wrote because his country--U.S.A--was too goddamn ignorant to understand. Letters from Earth is nothing but sheer brilliance, even better than Age of Reason and I do not say that lightly. And his awareness of this, including his instructions he gave to his daughter, undoubtedly affected how he was going to conclude his stories--I mean, he had to be begged not to print something as tame as The War Prayer and if you can't write that then anything else you're going to write is stymied.

Now with that said:

I'm still bleeding internally from the last act of Huckleberry Finn.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
User avatar
Absentminded_Wizard
Duke
Posts: 1122
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post by Absentminded_Wizard »

It does make me very sad how he died before being able to finish all of his stories.
Unless they pull a Kurt Vonnegut and retire from writing with some healthy years left, any writer's going to leave *something* unfinished.
Doom314's satirical 4e power wrote:Complete AnnihilationWar-metawarrior 1

An awesome bolt of multicolored light fires from your eyes and strikes your foe, disintegrating him into a fine dust in a nonmagical way.

At-will: Martial, Weapon
Standard Action Melee Weapon ("sword", range 10/20)
Target: One Creature
Attack: Con vs AC
Hit: [W] + Con, and the target is slowed.
User avatar
Count Arioch the 28th
King
Posts: 6172
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Count Arioch the 28th »

Neeeek wrote:
From what I gather, it was because he left his wife for Elizabeth, because his wife didn't want to have kids, which Anthony knew when he married her. And his leaving his wife was (attempted to be) portrayed as justified and somehow she (the wife) was supposed to be the bad guy. For being cheated on.
That's an inversion. Usually, the man is the bad guy if the woman cheats on him.

In short, I approve. Fuck that not child having fictional bitch.
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
User avatar
Prak
Serious Badass
Posts: 17350
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Prak »

The Proposal lost me the moment I read the plot summary...

now, yes, I realize it's a romantic comedy, but I actually occasionally like those pieces of drivel.

The Proposal however... is about Sexual Harassment, it would seem. A female employer is going to be deported so she makes her male employee marry her so she can stay (and they fall in love and bullshit like that...).

Now, honestly, I don't have much of a problem with the overall plot, it a bit trite and stupid, but really what bothers me is that if any guy tried that, short of some long haired spanish-voiced fabio fuck, the woman would be crying sexual harassment as soon as he even brought up the subject, and he'd get deported a penniless, shamed pitiable fool...
Koumei
Serious Badass
Posts: 13882
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: South Ausfailia

Post by Koumei »

Something I've noticed is that almost all romance stories tend to either be a "same old same old" rehashed idea - and if the gender roles are inverted, it's unable to work that way due to societal expectations.

But when they're same-sex, it changes all the rules because suddenly there isn't the one who is supposed to be easily manipulated, simple-thinking and in it for the sex sex sex (though protective and heroic) and the one who is manipulative, conniving, evil but ultimately emotional and falling in love.

Basically, the solution is for all romantic stories to be same-sex. Who else votes that we get a new wave of lesbian romantic comedies?
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
User avatar
Maxus
Overlord
Posts: 7645
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Maxus »

Well, yeah, romance novels really do work that "happy ending" bit. It's why people read them--an emotional pick-me-up. But the reason people *keep* reading them is a lot of romance writers can create amazing characters/dialogue. I think a website put it as, "The romance characters are going to get their happy ending, but if an author's a good one, the characters will deserve it."

And, yes, I am kinda familiar with romance novels and their redeeming values. I volunteered to be a guest reviewer, as a new reader reading romance. First (and so far only) book I've reviewed was the first book of Bujold's Sharing Knife. It was fun read, and it's only laziness that's kept me from badgering the library into getting #2 (They're out of forms, too).

So, yeah, they have a formula which ends in "Happily ever after!" Which is fine in and of itself. It's when a people are just too, too stupid (See Twilight) that it gets to be a problem.

To be honest, I'd much rather read something happy than sit there and plow through a crapsack and tell myself I'm being highbrow--just because it made the top #100 novels picked by some bunch of people doesn't mean it's good.

That and there's all kinds of formulas. In 10th Grade, we were reading A Seperate Peace, which I'd never even heard of and I read the introduction of Phinney and said, "He's going to die." Out loud (by accident). And the teacher said, "Oh, Alex, you've read this before?" And I had to say, "Nope. It's introducing a vibrant character, and they're making us read it in school. QED. This guy's days are numbered."
Last edited by Maxus on Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.

--The horror of Mario

Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
Starmaker
Duke
Posts: 2402
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Redmonton
Contact:

Post by Starmaker »

Koumei wrote:Who else votes that we get a new wave of lesbian romantic comedies?
I totally support that idea. Less sexist spam, less "crawling in my skin" tragically misunderstood bicurious teenagers with a bullshit childhood trauma, give us people.
Parthenon
Knight-Baron
Posts: 912
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:07 pm

Post by Parthenon »

So, Transformers ROTF. I tried hard to just go with the flow and enjoy it. I wowed at the big explosions, let my mind drift through the "comedy", the whole college part and the parents and just wanted to enjoy the tits, robots and explosions. It does have some cool bits (mostly Optimus Prime being completely awesome and taking on all the Decepticons at once). For most of the film I could ignore the fact that it was bad and have fun watching it.

There I was, ironically enjoying the bullshit and forcing myself to ignore the fact that robots find Megan Fox hot (seriously, the last film ended with Shia and Megan making out on top of their best friend while all the other robots stood around in a circle watching them, and probably jerking off) and that there are too many testicle jokes, when a couple of things happened to completely lose me.

Spoilered in case anyone hasn't watched it.
Firstly the complete fucking bullshit Deus Ex Machina that brings Shia back to life. What the fuck?! At that point I was groaning with my face in my palms. Then, Jetfire gives Optimus his parts and me and my brother started laughing out loud, probably pissing off the rest of the audience.

So, to anyone else who has watched it, how far did you manage to get before it lost you? Before or after they go to college? Was it right at the start with the ice cream van? Or the vat grown decepticons?
User avatar
TOZ
Duke
Posts: 1160
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 3:19 pm

Post by TOZ »

Every review and opinion I hear on T2 makes me want to see it less and less. Once again, the only reason I will is Optimus.
User avatar
Cynic
Prince
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Cynic »

No, because then he would be free to do make his next movie.

If it does not make money that is.
Ancient History wrote:We were working on Street Magic, and Frank asked me if a houngan had run over my dog.
Parthenon
Knight-Baron
Posts: 912
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 6:07 pm

Post by Parthenon »

Yeah, Optimus Prime is pretty much the only reason to watch it. I'd recommend watching up to the point just after Shia gets kidnapped where Optimus saves him then walking out of the cinema.

At the end of the film Optimus is just pathetic. Seriously, if your whole schtick is that you can transform into something else, then if you get things added on such that you can no longer transform you are not awesome, you are retarded.
cthulhu
Duke
Posts: 2162
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by cthulhu »

Parthenon wrote:
So, to anyone else who has watched it, how far did you manage to get before it lost you? Before or after they go to college? Was it right at the start with the ice cream van? Or the vat grown decepticons?
It wasn't exactly great, but then I noticed the plot arc was pretty much the same as the first one.

Then I noticed that they were reusing CGI from the first one.

Then I noticed that the only reason this wasn't really a shot for shot remake was because the shot length in transformers was so short that would be obnoxiously difficult to do.

In other words its crap.
Last edited by cthulhu on Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.
ubernoob
Duke
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:30 am

Post by ubernoob »

I liked transformers. Of course, I walked in knowing the plot would suck and just watching it for the tits and explosions.
User avatar
Prak
Serious Badass
Posts: 17350
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Prak »

ubernoob wrote:I liked transformers. Of course, I walked in knowing the plot would suck and just watching it for the tits and explosions.
ditto, I knew it'd be horrible, but it was entertaining, and so far free... (my friend hasn't bugged me about the money for the ticket yet...)
Koumei
Serious Badass
Posts: 13882
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: South Ausfailia

Post by Koumei »

Maxus wrote: To be honest, I'd much rather read something happy than sit there and plow through a crapsack and tell myself I'm being highbrow--just because it made the top #100 novels picked by some bunch of people doesn't mean it's good.
Oh trust me, I'm not JE, I like happy endings. It's just that the characters (in movies more than romance novels) basically seem like carbon copies. The last romantic comedy I enjoyed was President of the United States. Before that? Love Actually
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
User avatar
Prak
Serious Badass
Posts: 17350
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Prak »

shit, I'm trying to think of the last romantic comedy I actually watched... (other than something inherently nerdy, like Shawn of the Dead or Princess Bride)...

Head Over Heels, I think?

fuck if I know...
Draco_Argentum
Duke
Posts: 2434
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Draco_Argentum »

Koumei wrote:Basically, the solution is for all romantic stories to be same-sex. Who else votes that we get a new wave of lesbian romantic comedies?
You'll just get all the gay tropes rehashed a million times. I agree that gay love stories are more interesting but I doubt that'd hold up if it became the popular thing to write about.
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by Crissa »

The Proposal wasn't bad.

-Crissa
User avatar
Prak
Serious Badass
Posts: 17350
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Prak »

I just don't get it... if the genders were reversed, it'd be sexual harassment, but with the woman doing the propositioning, it's romantic?
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by Crissa »

No, it is definitely sexual harassment. However, there are things not mentioned in the trailers which are extenuating circumstances. It's a nice turn around on the standard trope, yes.

-Crissa
User avatar
Prak
Serious Badass
Posts: 17350
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Prak »

ah, ok. I'm just going from a plot summary from imdb or something.
User avatar
Count Arioch the 28th
King
Posts: 6172
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Count Arioch the 28th »

I've been thinking of writing a romance novel parody. I was organizing those things at work and reading the backs, and it seems that the really bad ones are practically mad-libs. I was going to a parody called "The Biology Major's Reluctant Mistress" with a picture of me on the cover with an atractive woman looking t me in vague disgust.

It will be a tale of how an eccentric college student woos this beautiful woman, then she drops him for an attractive dolt. The parody would be that it would be true to real life.
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
Post Reply