Caesar? I don't know. That's why I'm asking.Juton wrote:Sure, do you have any candidates that show this though?Maj wrote:So back to the topic...
What about historical figures? Real people do seem to go through a leveling effect, so do stories about them count?
It's justification, I guess.virgil wrote:Is it really all that helpful to discuss the age of the leveling trope in stories?
I asked earlier about filling out a low-magic version of the fighter, and the responses seemed to support the idea that D&D can't really be a low-magic game. Twenty levels of banality just won't cut it.
So why is the notion of low-magic = low level so despised by players?
The only thing I can think of is that it's really not a love of low magic, it's a hate of high magic. Sort of like how the current Democratic campaign is "Don't vote Republican because they're the ones that screwed us over"... But voting Democrat is actually kind of lame given how ineffective and pussyish they're being.
Exactly. Players want the uberity of bigger and bigger numbers without breaking the traditional storylines that their fantasy has.Princess wrote:virgil, the trouble is that DnD creators don't want players to have such powers. Dungeon have walls, traps, pits and such stuff. Truly epic fighter will just render it all useless.