Meikle641 wrote: Doomsday: How BP Gulf disaster may have triggered a 'world-killing' event Are you fucking kidding me? I mean, I read about methane pockets as an extinction event nearly a year ago on Cracked, but this is seriously maybe happening?
I don't get too worked up about scaremongering that often, but if this is true...what the fuck can be done? I'm guessing very little.
I am often baffled at how many of these things are labeled as putting humanity back to the dark ages. Granted it would suck extremely bad, on the order of millions upon millions of lives lost and worldwide economies crapped upon extra hard, but I imagine civilization at large would continue on. The effects would be global, but humanity would continue.
Oh, I just watched a short
youtube video on the methane bubble extinction events, and see why it is more globally horrific (I originally assumed the greater global impact would largely be dissolution of food chains and economies). Apparently flaming tsunamis and such are only the beginning. Riiiight at the end Ryskin mentions 50 meter coverage of the entire Earth in methane gas, which would be ungood. Of course the video ends before that description can be explained further.
I presume for dramatic/descriptive effect he just compared total volume of gas released by a bubble versus volume of space that would cover the earth in 50 meters. It would be deeper nearer to the site, and would not reach up mountains.
(checks Indianapolis' sealevel, ah good, over 200m... that means I win, right?)
I wonder if the contingency for such an event (if there could be a contingency) is to nuke the fucking bubble and hope to fight fire with fire accelerating the burn before gasses reach all of civilization. I imagine in a global extinction event there really isn't a reason to hold back and be reasonable.