Page 3 of 3

Re: Frank & K Ruleset SRD

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 4:55 pm
by Bigode
What others? I suppose you mean something made somewhere by third parties, since only RoW had the warrior.

Re: Frank & K Ruleset SRD

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:32 pm
by CatharzGodfoot
Bigode at [unixtime wrote:1200761731[/unixtime]]What others? I suppose you mean something made somewhere by third parties, since only RoW had the warrior.

Yeah. The only one I can think of right now is the NPC mage (which is about on the level of the fire mage).

Re: Frank & K Ruleset SRD

Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:08 pm
by Bigode
This seems to be the relevant thread.

Re: Frank & K Ruleset SRD

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:25 am
by Aktariel
How about some of Koumei's
[counturl=136]high level weapons?[/counturl]

I would definitely wield something from that list..


Re: Frank & K Ruleset SRD

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:29 am
by Bigode
IIRC, Koumei herself stated something to the effect of "I don't have the vaguest clue of whether this is balanced".

Re: Frank & K Ruleset SRD

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:02 am
by Koumei
That is correct. I went with "What is cool, and sounds reasonable, considering the fact that Wizards are doing crazy shit without these." and left it up to other people to say "That's not balanced!"

That being said, most of them were considered balanced, the only iffy one being the Eldritch Glaive, and there needing to be a note that wights spawned from wightskin gloves cannot create their own spawn.

Re: Frank & K Ruleset SRD

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 2:37 am
by Bigode
Considering that many people (at least for the standards of a tiny board) looked over (and liked) the stuff, why don't you just ask some suggestions for appropriate levels?

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:00 pm
by fbmf
So what happened to the SRD?

Game On,
fbmf

Posted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 10:58 pm
by DragonChild
The person who I was relying on for hosting it has taken their hosting down (without informing me, although that's no surprise due to not talking to them for a bit), and I no longer have the original files. It's basically been up on other people's hosting the entire time, and I've sorta been leeching, which is why it's always been so damn shoddy.

At this point, the D&D wiki is providing an outright better service than I could (see here: http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Races_of_War_(3.5e_Sourcebook ) thanks to Surgo so I have no real plans to put it back up.

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:42 am
by Maxus
Well, it's a bit more than just that.

http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Category:Tome

And there's categories for Skill Feats, Combat Feats, Fiend Feats...

So, yeah, it's what I use these days.

Surgo made the Tomes into Sourcebooks much better than I ever could, and he's put some of the Den classes up--the Kantian Paladin, the Fire Mage, the Puppeteer (I think), and the Genie.

I need to put up Bigode's Dragon class, come to think of it...

That is, if he doesn't mind.

Plus, Tome materials's getting some respect on there; about the most common comment on the actual tomes is that "You might not agree, but it'll make you think.". Although looking back on a few on a few of my rebuttals, I got too pissy in a few places.

I had a lot on my mind during a lot of my rebuttals to crappy ratings, but I'm supposed to know better. :blush:

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:47 pm
by Meikle641
http://www.dandwiki.com/wiki/Tome_Material Not sure if this is done purposefully by all us for condensing, or what. (I never go to this site...)

Edit: Bit of both then. Right.