Page 3 of 3

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 8:42 pm
by JonSetanta
Oh.. Biden... right. :ugone2far:

Snowball, hell, etc.

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 10:32 pm
by Crissa
Yes, pretty much all of the Democratic candidates have waffled but supported Civil Unions. Kucinich was the only one to openly say he was for it.

That was probably the least important bit of information on the chart - and on a candidate that pulled out like four weeks ago.

-Crissa

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:40 pm
by JonSetanta
So, the rest is accurate?

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:02 am
by Username17
sigma999 at [unixtime wrote:1202254839[/unixtime]]So, the rest is accurate?


Well, McCain waffled on the torture issue.

-Username17

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 12:55 am
by Crissa
I wouldn't say it is complete, but the seven remaining candidates are fairly well covered.

McCain has the most errors, I think. He actively voted against the constitutional amendment against gay marriage, but voted for the federal law. He changed his position on Guantanamo to pro. He voted for wire tapping last week. And he's waffled on ANWR drilling.

The remaining Democratic candidates are Clinton, Obama, Gravel. Gravel isn't campaigning, I like him, but voting for him is kinda pointless. Obama is as middle of the road democrat you can get, and Clinton is the establishment candidate. Saying that, Clinton has done more to be different than the establishment than Obama (most diverse hiring, promoting, and only non-sexist candidacy), although Obama has been more liberal on some points like censorship and drug enforcement (that being that it should be less invasive).

I feel like I'm choosing otherwise identical candidates in the Democratic Primary. I can't remember candidates so alike x-x Same federal experience, similar upbringing, same social status, same DNC sponsorship, same social work... And I'm not going to vote on the difference between working for a large state employer while doing pro-bono political activism vs working as a political activist and then ending up in the state legislature. That's pretty similar, honestly. One can't really run for legislature when your spouse is an elected official, and one does need to work if your spouse is a state legislator (or aspiring).

Clinton is projected to win the most delegates today, but I'd guess that Obama actually will eek out a win. A Clinton clear win will mean she'll choose someone not like Obama as a running mate. A less clear win might mean a coalition candidacy. And Obama win... I dunno. Lotsa promises, not much to show for it at the Federal level yet.

-Crissa

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 4:21 pm
by Fwib
As I understand it, legislation in the US is typically made up into great big composite motions full of stuff unrelated to the title of the text (like 'pork-barrel' spending, added to get votes for something) - so how does a legislator deal with the problem of people claiming they are for or against some subject, because it happened to be one of several things on a bill that they voted for/against?

Or have I misunderstood?

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:23 pm
by Crissa
That's why Senators historically don't get elected President, Fwib. Compromise makes for bad slogans.

-Crissa

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:18 pm
by Fwib
I look forward to seeing if Arnie can get the law changed so he can run for president. That would be interesting.

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 8:35 pm
by tzor
Fwib at [unixtime wrote:1202404699[/unixtime]]I look forward to seeing if Arnie can get the law changed so he can run for president. That would be interesting.


With Romney now out of the race that leaves only Arnie's Candiate and Chuck Norris' Candidate in the running. Now a "debate" between Arnie and Chuck ... that would be "interesting."

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:26 pm
by Cielingcat
I wanna see that so bad.

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 12:15 am
by cthulhu
Has sly endorsed anyone? preferably a democrat?

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 7:58 am
by Username17
Stallone is a staunch Republican and endorsed McCain. Most "action stars" actually believe some of the crap about cleaning up towns with two fisted justice and lean heavily towards knee-jerk republicanism. For example Bruce Willis, while a fun actor to watch, is personally a drunken idiot who is against taxes and for police states as long as it doesn't interfere in his own ability to spend his piles of money and drink heavily.

But all is not lost on the ultimate showdown.

Hulk Hogan supports Obama.
50 Cent endorses Clinton.

-Username17

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 3:08 am
by CatharzGodfoot
Hogan would be a great vice president.

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 3:28 am
by the_taken
CatharzGodfoot at [unixtime wrote:1202526523[/unixtime]]Hogan would be a great vice president.


He also makes a great giant monster.

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 4:42 am
by JonSetanta
President: Obama
VP: Hogan

Team Kickass

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:03 am
by Josh_Kablack
sigma999 wrote:Oh.. Biden... right. :ugone2far:

Snowball, hell, etc.
I'm going with etc. here :p


Also, as per http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washing ... obama.html
In past years, Biden received $1,000 checks from Sylvester Stallone, Ellen Barkin, and West Wing producer Aaron Sorkin, and $2,000 from West Wing actor Bradley Whitford. Michael J. Fox gave him $2,000 back in 2001. Cher gave him $2,100 in 2006.