Page 4 of 7

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:18 am
by Ganbare Gincun
What the fuck is up with Ivy's tits? Her rack has exploded in size since she was first introduced. Good god.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:26 am
by Crissa
Strangely, male PCs end up looking less often like Jack and more often like nanuk, while female ones look more like red sonja than vice versa...

-Crissa

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:31 am
by Caedrus
Ganbare Gincun wrote:What the fuck is up with Ivy's tits? Her rack has exploded in size since she was first introduced. Good god.
The same has happened to a lot of characters in the Soul Edge/Calibur series. The sexualization of the female cast has upped significantly with every new game, and in 4 it's just ridiculous.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 3:21 am
by Count Arioch the 28th
It's really a shame, that used to be my favorite fighting game.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 3:38 am
by Lago PARANOIA
Caedrus wrote: And being a pervert is a running gag for Franky.
Franky, even when he's just being his normal cyborg self, still runs around in an unbuttoned Hawaiian shirt and a speedo. Even in the snow.
Caedrus wrote: Chainmail bikinis fall into this category. It's always out of place and it dehumanizes any character that's wearing one.
So it's okay for your character to be a nudist or run around in combat lingerie but not in chainmail bikinis?

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 3:54 am
by Josh_Kablack
Chainmail bikinis fall into this category. It's always out of place and it dehumanizes any character that's wearing one.
Counterpoint: Makri in the Thraxas books.

She wears the chianmail bikini solely to increase the tips she earns as a barmaid in to help fund her courses at the Guild College and the secret intrigues that the Association of Gentlewomen works to wear away at the patriarchial order in Turai.

Yeah, it's a bit of self-referential winking at the fantasy trope of the chainmail bikini, but it's not really out-of-place and it actually helps to humanize an otherwise superhuman character.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:16 am
by Caedrus
Josh_Kablack wrote:
Chainmail bikinis fall into this category. It's always out of place and it dehumanizes any character that's wearing one.
Counterpoint: Makri in the Thraxas books.

She wears the chianmail bikini solely to increase the tips she earns as a barmaid in to help fund her courses at the Guild College and the secret intrigues that the Association of Gentlewomen works to wear away at the patriarchial order in Turai.

Yeah, it's a bit of self-referential winking at the fantasy trope of the chainmail bikini, but it's not really out-of-place and it actually helps to humanize an otherwise superhuman character.
Well sure, but that's not the way it's used in, for example, Red Sonja. In Makri's case it's actually included in the story for a reason. It doesn't really change my point at all: The problem isn't with the attire itself, but rather the context (or lack thereof) for it. If it makes you any happier, I'll say "chainmail bikinis almost always fall into this category."

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:22 am
by Leress
Caedrus wrote:
Well sure, but that's not the way it's used in, for example, Red Sonja. In Makri's case it's actually included in the story for a reason. It doesn't really change my point at all.
That means that your statement is poorly written.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:38 am
by Caedrus
Leress wrote:That means that your statement is poorly written.
Oh boy, I used the word "always" instead of "almost always." As if people don't do that for all sorts of things. People don't typically mean "literally everyone knows that Fighters suck" when they say "Everyone knows Fighters suck" for example.
Leress wrote:It's not only the problem of using the word "always" instead of "almost always" it is also you said that it always dehumanizes the person doing it.
Unexplained nonsensical sexualized attire that lacks any kind of appropriate context is out of place and dehumanizes the character. Chainmail bikinis usually fall into this category (but might not in the case of, say, a person wearing a costume for the express purpose of arousing customers to get more tips in the context of the story). Better?

(Edited since Leress deleted his reply after I responded to it...)

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:39 am
by Lago PARANOIA
Caedrus wrote:The problem isn't with the attire itself, but rather the context (or lack thereof) for it.
They're wearing it because it's titillating to the invisible viewer. Not because it's comfortable or protective or honorable or whatever, but strictly because it's titillating.

That a good enough reason? That straightforward enough?

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:41 am
by Leress
Caedrus wrote:
(Edited since Leress deleted his reply after I responded to it...)
I did that since I read your post from the previous page.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 5:02 am
by Caedrus
Leress wrote:
Caedrus wrote:
(Edited since Leress deleted his reply after I responded to it...)
I did that since I read your post from the previous page.
Ah, I see.

But it seems like someone else didn't...
Lago PARANOIA wrote:
Caedrus wrote:The problem isn't with the attire itself, but rather the context (or lack thereof) for it.
They're wearing it because it's titillating to the invisible viewer. Not because it's comfortable or protective or honorable or whatever, but strictly because it's titillating.

That a good enough reason? That straightforward enough?
Lago, learn to read. That falls pretty straightforwardly into the category I described.
My problem isn't with whether people wear revealing clothing (or even if they wear anything at all), it has to do with characters who are dressed really obviously absurdly for the sole purpose of titillation, outside of any in-story context, often even at the expense of story if need be (For example, the Fanservice Girl character never, ever having her stripperific costume she wears all the time commented on in an RPG, even if such things are commented on for other people when plot appropriate). Likewise, this wouldn't be an issue to me if it were in something that is *about* sexualization, like porn. But D&D isn't that.
Last I checked, "the invisible viewer" wasn't part of the setting context in D&D.[/b]
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:It's really a shame, that used to be my favorite fighting game.
Yeah, I really enjoyed Soul Edge.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 6:16 am
by Maj
Caedrus wrote:Maybe it's just me, but I strongly prefer this kind of image to chainmail bikinis.

Image
Mmm... Sometimes. I discovered recently, though, that I have a personal bias against [most] images of chicks with short hair. That one is OK, though.
Caedrus wrote:rather than pretending that chainmail bikinis are actual protective wear.
In a world where wearing a ring somehow protects you better, I have no problem believing that the chainmail bikini actually does something. This isn't to say that I think every character should be wearing one, just that it's more justifiable than you give it credit for.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 7:38 am
by K
I've always thought the easiest solution for the chain-mail bikini was the simple argument that:

A. Magic armor doesn't need a lot of material since it protects you with force fields, and...

B. Dirty old man Wizards make the bulk of magic armor.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:45 am
by malak
Caedrus wrote:Chainmail bikinis fall into this category. It's always out of place and it dehumanizes any character that's wearing one.
What kind of prude backwards attitude is this? 'dehumanizes' o.O

Welcome to the 19th century.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:00 am
by Prak
K wrote:I've always thought the easiest solution for the chain-mail bikini was the simple argument that:

A. Magic armor doesn't need a lot of material since it protects you with force fields, and...

B. Dirty old man Wizards make the bulk of magic armor.
Not to mention we're talking about a game where if someone got the most protective benefit out of wearing a duck on his head, he'd, at least, seriously consider the option.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:10 am
by Username17
I personally think that boobs generally "humanize" people. To the point where when people put boobs onto lizard people I'm like "Stop anthropomorphizing those guys so damn much!" I really have no problem with people dressing for "rule of cool" rather than practicality in fantasy.

I like boobs.

-Username17

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 11:22 am
by Koumei
Boobs are awesome.

And if chainmail bikinis have to go, then my vote goes to Greek style, with naked boobs.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 11:30 am
by Lago PARANOIA
Koumei wrote:And if chainmail bikinis have to go, then my vote goes to Greek style, with naked boobs.
They can have my chainmail bikini when they pry it off my cold, dead penis. :saywhat:

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 3:08 pm
by Count Arioch the 28th
Lago PARANOIA wrote:
Koumei wrote:And if chainmail bikinis have to go, then my vote goes to Greek style, with naked boobs.
They can have my chainmail bikini when they pry it off my cold, dead penis. :saywhat:
Thanks for the visual :shocked:

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 3:49 pm
by CatharzGodfoot
Lago PARANOIA wrote:
Koumei wrote:And if chainmail bikinis have to go, then my vote goes to Greek style, with naked boobs.
They can have my chainmail bikini when they pry it off my cold, dead penis. :saywhat:
Men, this is why you shouldn't try to masturbate with somebody's chainmail bikini. It will have to be pried off your cold, dead penis.

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 5:37 pm
by Crissa
Prak, have you played Dokapon?

-Crissa

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 7:03 pm
by Prak
Koumei wrote:Boobs are awesome.

And if chainmail bikinis have to go, then my vote goes to Greek style, with naked boobs.
I vote for full Greek style, with naked boobs and naked men a la 300. The reaping mauler should totally be some super fit guy wearing nothing.

Crissa: Nope. And I know nothing about it, either, explain?

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:26 pm
by CatharzGodfoot
Prak_Anima wrote: I vote for full Greek style, with naked boobs and naked men a la 300. The reaping mauler should totally be some super fit guy wearing nothing.
Full Greek style. Nothing but a
Nebuchadnezzar wrote:kynodesme

Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:06 pm
by Crissa
There's a duck you can put on your head in it. Doesn't change your game stats, though, so no one keeps it. But they all try it if they find it, because that is worth points.

-Crissa