Page 4 of 4

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:26 am
by owlassociate
I'll tell you what I'm not here for. It's this thread, whose only redeeming quality is The Count's budding homosexuality.

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:43 am
by The Adventurer's Almanac
Budding? :wink:

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 12:55 am
by Libertad
deaddmwalking wrote:I'm not saying it's good that people think that, but it was built into the rules. A 20th level commoner is a thing that exists. Clearly, a 20th level commoner isn't supposed to be as good as a 20th level fighter which implies level means 'the best you can be in your niche' and not 'equal power level'.

If they capped commoners at level 4 it would have done a lot to make it clear that some concepts expire.
Said commoner is likely either the world's greatest farmer, a notable labor union leader, or Secretary-General of the Silverymoon Communist Party.

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 1:26 am
by nockermensch
If I had to pick a low point for 3E sillyness, "20th level commoners" would be it.

Posted: Fri Jan 03, 2020 9:09 am
by Count Arioch the 28th
The Adventurer's Almanac wrote:Budding? :wink:
Yeah, that was pretty much my reaction.