Page 4 of 4
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 9:41 am
by Prak
My take on kobolds gives them accurate reptilian cloacas--save for the fact that they are actually all sexless (anatomically. They enjoy the act, they just don't actually have genitalia unless they specifically alter themselves with an alchemical elixir made from certain gems)
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 10:19 am
by Count Arioch the 28th
I reject any take that doesn't involve scaley tiddays in some way.
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 4:25 pm
by Prak
I'm agnostic on kobold titties.
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:04 pm
by The Adventurer's Almanac
Kobold titties are heresy and Count will pay for his crimes against lizard chicks. Do not sexualize the kobold!
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 6:38 pm
by Prak
My kobold necromancer sexualises herself, thank you very much.
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 6:58 pm
by The Adventurer's Almanac
We already know you're a heretic, Prak.
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 3:12 am
by Prak
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:03 am
by DrPraetor
Kobolds are culturally and politically dominated by hominins, right?
So Kobolds associate mammalian traits with urbane sophistication - like French food in the US, Kobolds eroticize mammaries and mammalian reproductive organs as a status symbol. Likewise, Kobolds want the attention of high level, sophisticated mammals as a status symbol - so they grow tits, because the freaky humans/drow/etc. are into it.
Meanwhile, a radical, anti-colonialist kobold consciousness is prevalent as a reaction (but is problematized by association with dragons).
It's tough to be a woke Kobold.
--DrP
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:30 am
by Prak
I was thinking about this on my drive home tonight. I'm of two minds on Kobold Tits. On the one hand, tits are awesome, and kobolds are a fantasy race, so kobold tits are fine by me. On the other hand, I'm a pretty died in the wool monster-fucker/xenophile, and I'm also totally into reptilian/avian monsters who do not have mammary glands.
Generally, I think of kobolds as primarily lizard people, who are distinct from lizardfolk because they have dragon blood. But I also see them as innately magical, having been made from Tiamat's lost eggs by Kurtulmak. Honestly, in my general D&D setting, yeah, some kobolds have tits because they decided they wanted tits, and some don't, because they don't naturally and those particular kobolds were never struck with the desire to have them.
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:47 am
by Count Arioch the 28th
Mammaries on things that aren't mammals is one of my fetishes. Lizard boobs, bird boobs, bug boobs, robo-boobs, it's all good.
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 5:56 am
by DrPraetor
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:Mammaries on things that aren't mammals is one of my fetishes. Lizard boobs, bird boobs, bug boobs, robo-boobs, it's all good.
https://mobile.twitter.com/robdenbleyke ... 2063290368
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 6:08 am
by Prak
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 11:09 am
by Thaluikhain
Eh, personally not seeing the point of kobold boobs. If you want boobs, you've got a zillion different mammals already, surely kobolds are interesting because they are different?
(As an aside, no reason that mammals require big obvious breasts when not lactating anyway)
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2020 7:53 pm
by Korwin
Koumei wrote:That was a think Frank put forward. It isn't a thing in Ishuzoku. But they mention how harpies have an "all in one" cloaca, and how cyclopes think of eyes the way we think of boobs (specifically, the bigger the better, with some getting a complex over their small size), and build-a-bitch golem brothels existing.
I object to the use of we in this sentence. Too big boobs are an thing.
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2020 8:55 pm
by Darth Rabbitt
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2020 4:34 am
by Count Arioch the 28th
Korwin wrote:I object to the use of we in this sentence. Too big boobs are an thing.
Gonna disagree with you big-time, friendo.
