FrankTrollman wrote:Something I often do is to simply write sentences or portions of sentences within a thought, and then when I get stuck simply drop down a line and begin another thought in another paragraph. It gets things done quickly because you cover a lot of ground without needing to spend time beating yourself up over thoughts you aren't ready to finish. Unfortunately you can sometimes forget to go back and finish something, leaving a sentence or concept at the end of a paragraph to
But one you've done that a few times, you've got a scaffold to hang your essay (or whatever) on. A basic argument may be 3 or five paragraphs, and if you just write an introductory sentence or two into each one you'll have places to hang further sentences as you think of them. Remember that while you read a work one sentence after another, there's no reason you have to write it that way. Every time you have a stray thought, or remember something you should have said, or whatever, you can take these thought fragments and file them in their appropriate paragraphs with the magic of word processing software. This will make you sound erudite and focused in print, even if the real you is wandering from thought to thought like a 4 year old on acid.
-Username17
This is actually a really good idea.
When I was working as a peer tutor at my school's writing centre, the biggest portion of my time dealt with helping people write essays.
The basic rundown of the steps that I used was:
1. Brainstorm: write down any ideas, or examples you want to use; both for and against; don't worry what you write here, you're brainstorming, and no idea is a bad idea
2. Group Ideas: group your ideas together, the most similar being put together. For a hamburger persuasive essay, you'll want 3 'groups', with 3 proof/examples/ideas in each. If you have enough, move to the next step, if you need more, go back to step 1.
3. Title Idea Groups: Come up with a phrase, or title, or description for each group of ideas; sometimes this is
trick; I've honestly spent 5 or 10 minutes, given up, and then come back to a few ideas before coming up with an inclusive and accurate title or description for the ideas in a group
4. Thesis: Write your thesis; the three main supporting parts of your thesis are... those three titles/descriptions that you spent slaving over. Seriously, writing a thesis should come after you've got an idea of what you want to argue, and what you will use to prove it.
5. Thesis, unchanged: Note, you just wrote your thesis, and have your proofs already; as well as the title/description for each group of proofs. Thesis could be easily derived from your proof, meaning that you won't be editing, and reworking your thesis every time you have new proofs/material to add to your body paragraphs.
6. Write: You can start working on your intro, body and concluding paragraphs now.
7. Tie in: Remember, your proofs need to mention that they prove, or are linked to the idea of their respective body paragraph. Likewise, your body paragraphs need to be linked to your thesis.
This has to be done for every proof, every quote, and every body paragraph. Your body paragraphs will start, and end, with a sentence that explains how the idea of that particular body paragraph is linked to the thesis statement.
People tend to forget things in the middle of text; meaning that you
really need to hammer home the ideas in the middle of your essay.
If not, your body paragraphs will seriously be forgotten as the paper is read.
8. Stuck?: If you get stuck; go back to brainstorming. Look at your other proofs that you didn't use, look for new ones related to your existing groups. Sometimes you'll have to gut
something. Trust me it's okay, it's a pain in the ass, but you're better off not having something that you know is shit.
9. Review, Edit: When you're done,
read it all, preferably with someone else sitting beside you, and reading it with you. You'll edit a lot better than on your own. One thing that I never did as a tutor was solo-review a student's work; they're already there, and know the material better than me. The writer of something is able to notice mistakes easier than someone reviewing a document
I tended to use a single sheet of paper to explain this process using 'fake' lists of ideas; then making those ideas into groups; creating titles; creating the essay.
The centre's handout/guideline had similar steps, but was a lot less structured on how to go about generating titles and thesis in a straightforward manner.
With the method above, you can seriously write about whatever, and since the
structure of the writing is organized, it will always come out to be a cohesive persuasive essay.
Writing unstructured essays is possible as well, in fact the best writing is essentially an unstructured, or uniquely structured essay. For example, Races of War, is actually a collection of unstructured essays and articles that prove about a dozen different points, and then give recommendations on how to make proven problems become less of a problem.
I've been able to give two pages of Tome material to someone who last played D&D
before the year 2000; and they were able to understand and enjoy what was being explained to them.
However, that doesn't mean that structure is unnecessary. Structure is there to make the writing organized, and easier to understand. The brainstorming that occurred before doesn't need to be shown, so make a big fucking mess when you are merely generating ideas.