Saw a truck carrying a missile on side of highway, smoke was

Mundane & Pointless Stuff I Must Share: The Off Topic Forum

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
OgreBattle
King
Posts: 6820
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 9:33 am

Saw a truck carrying a missile on side of highway, smoke was

Post by OgreBattle »

It was on September 8th, around 6-7pm.

Unfortunately I didn't have enough time to take a picture as we drove by it too quickly, and I was in a bit of a "What the hell is that a missile launcher on the back of a truck with smoke coming out of its wheels??" shock.

It was pulled over on the right hand side of the road. The big rig had a flat bed back, which carried a caterpillar treaded vehicle with what looked like a single large missile (missile launcher, missile transporter? My knowledge of this sort of thing isn't good enough to identify it). There was white smoke coming from the flat bed itself (maybe the wheels?)

I've been trying to google information about it and checked twitter, but nobody's posted pictures. All I've been able to find is just a tweet from one other person who saw it on I-880 North today.

This is one of the strangest things I've seen. Is it just a movie prop? Was it a real piece of military hardware? I want to solve this mystery but god damnit I can't find any news online about it.
Pseudo Stupidity
Duke
Posts: 1060
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:51 pm

Post by Pseudo Stupidity »

Did you see the plates at all? Government plates would be a dead giveaway as to whether it was a real weapon or not. Also, if the missile was being carried parallel to the ground it's more likely to have been a real one (they only angle them for launch).

Most of the single-missile launching vehicles are around the size of a humvee with a big, ladder-ass looking thing on the back. But they also tend to not be treaded. Source: I used to work for a magazine about military equipment and went to a bunch of trade shows where they'd show it off.

It could be that they were just transporting a missile from base to base or something, but I don't think you'd want to use civilian equipment that isn't designed for transporting those sorts of things.

Edit: The closest I can think of to a construction-equipment looking launcher is the m39, and I think it might be kind of old.
Last edited by Pseudo Stupidity on Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
sandmann wrote:
Zak S wrote:I'm not a dick, I'm really nice.
Zak S wrote:(...) once you have decided that you will spend any part of your life trolling on the internet, you forfeit all rights as a human.If you should get hit by a car--no-one should help you. If you vote on anything--your vote should be thrown away.

If you wanted to participate in a conversation, you've lost that right. You are a non-human now. You are over and cancelled. No concern of yours can ever matter to any member of the human race ever again.
User avatar
Sigil
Knight
Posts: 472
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 4:17 am

Post by Sigil »

It doesn't necessarily have to be a US manufactured vehicle either, the US military maintains fleets of foreign produced vehicles for testing weapon targeting systems of weapons and other similar things, and bases regularly loan one another vehicles that they wouldn't normally have access to.

Amusing anecdote, when my father was in the civil service they would hang deactivated manpads in their offices as decoration. One of his coworkers was moving buildings, but didn't manage to move all his stuff to the new building before it closed for the weekend. He ended up getting a visit from the FBI because a guy on probation called his probation officer and told him "I saw my neighbor putting missile launchers in his garage."
Koumei
Serious Badass
Posts: 13882
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: South Ausfailia

Post by Koumei »

Would the military just transport missiles around in plain sight? You'd think they'd at least put a tarp over it so as to not worry people needlessly. I was going to say "to protect it from the elements", but then I remembered it's a missile, if a bit of rain fucks it up, you need to go back to the drawing board.
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
name_here
Prince
Posts: 3346
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:55 pm

Post by name_here »

I've occasionally seen big convoys of clearly military vehicles on highways, jeeps and army transport trucks. Wouldn't be surprised to learn that the army transports missile launchers by truck, though I'm pretty sure most mobile missile systems have a lot of missiles ready to fire near-simultaneously.

As for the smoke, my guess would be the brakes overheated. Military vehicles weigh a lot, so I would imagine going downhill in a truck carrying one for long enough could cause problems.
DSMatticus wrote:It's not just that everything you say is stupid, but that they are Gordian knots of stupid that leave me completely bewildered as to where to even begin. After hearing you speak Alexander the Great would stab you and triumphantly declare the puzzle solved.
Grek
Prince
Posts: 3114
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:37 pm

Post by Grek »

Koumei wrote:Would the military just transport missiles around in plain sight? You'd think they'd at least put a tarp over it so as to not worry people needlessly. I was going to say "to protect it from the elements", but then I remembered it's a missile, if a bit of rain fucks it up, you need to go back to the drawing board.
They do. They have these big shit green trucks with canvas tents in back. Like this:
Image
Not only do they not want to scare the public and avoid whatever it is they're shipping getting rained on, there's also a valid strategic reason to not let people look inside the truck - they don't want enemy spies to be able to hide outside a military base and make a list of the trucks are carrying as they go by.
Chamomile wrote:Grek is a national treasure.
Morat
Journeyman
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 4:36 am

Post by Morat »

Was it this thing?

If so, that's a (nonfunctional!) Scud launcher previously owned by the Military Vehicle Technology Foundation, one of the largest private collections of the kind. The owner died a few years ago, and the collection was signed over to a foundation in Massachussets last year, while ~120 vehicles were sold to fund a new museum to hold the rest.

And since there were hundreds of vehicles that needed to be moved and they've only had a year to do it, I wouldn't be surprised that they were still in the process. Also, the MVTF was in Portola Valley, CA, so the (probable) route to Massachusetts runs north all the way up 880 to hit I-80 E.
Post Reply