The appropriate amount of sexual content in D&D.

Sir Neil · Post by **Sir Neil** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:16 am

erik wrote:My eyes have never strayed that far down on that pic before.

+1

Centurion13 · Post by **Centurion13** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:06 pm

K wrote:The leg is fine. The problem is that the sash does not conform to the curve of her leg. She is at an angle so the other leg is mostly behind her.

Chances are good it was a sexy drawing at first like a nude, and they went back and said "cover up her pubic area" but the guy didn't take the time to rework the whole drawing.

It still looks really weird. The upper part, like you said, appears to be a nude but after that it just got messed up.

Stuff like this is nice if there is a reason in the text for a nature spirit to assume the form of a woman (and a good looking one) and then put on the sexy (although most good looking women seem to do it naturally). Otherwise, like the leg, it's just jarring.

But as was pointed out, this might be the only date some gamers ever get and sex does sell.

Cent13

Lago PARANOIA · Post by **Lago PARANOIA** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:10 pm

So. Anyone have any web links to sexy monsters and sexy adaptations of existing monsters? Preferably with pictures?

...

Don't judge me, motherfuckers.

I can feel your beady little eyes, judging me over the Internet. I just wanted some nymph barbarians, man! I don't need this shit.

Crissa · Post by **Crissa** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:18 pm

Not safe for work. Some of the images are horribly graphic.

http://monster-girl.homelinux.net/upload.cgi?m=I (Best)
http://kurobine.sakura.ne.jp/ (they're switching to pixiv, but this is the best place to link to it.)

There's two others I like, but these sites often go down on the weekend, so it's hard to affirm their links on a Saturday.

-Crissa

Username17 · Post by **Username17** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:51 pm

Monster Girls Encyclopedia. Now in Engrish.

-Username17

Count Arioch the 28th · Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:20 pm

FrankTrollman wrote:Monster Girls Encyclopedia. Now in Engrish.

-Username17

I don't think that semen could support so many populations of monsters. I question if the person who wrote the entries really knows anything about biology.

Username17 · Post by **Username17** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:47 pm

I don't know about you, but my semen is magic. And it can sustain many monster girls.

-Username17

hogarth · Post by **hogarth** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:50 pm

Count Arioch the 28th wrote:I don't think that semen could support so many populations of monsters. I question if the person who wrote the entries really knows anything about biology.

I thought male elves were the spooge-eaters, not females.

Centurion13 · Post by **Centurion13** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:55 pm

Count Arioch the 28th wrote:
FrankTrollman wrote:Monster Girls Encyclopedia. Now in Engrish.

-Username17
I don't think that semen could support so many populations of monsters. I question if the person who wrote the entries really knows anything about biology.

Probably thinking of creatures which produce quarts of the stuff. Like horses or something. Damn, I can understand the comment about the human species being in decline, but these critters should have faded away long ago. Human women are nothing to mess with when it comes to their men. They can be just as ruthless and unforgiving as any tyrant.

Just a little too human-male-centric for me... only in Japan, land of the dick nipples, can you find entire species resembling human women with one important difference - they want you no matter what you look like or who you are. Your penis automatically guarantees admission to emission... or something like that.

Cent13

Maxus · Post by **Maxus** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:56 pm

Oh dear god.

After looking into that.

It appears that some weird crazy sorceror-demon thing altered all the monsters in the world to the monster girls. And added in the semen thing.

Classy.

Centurion13 · Post by **Centurion13** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:57 pm

FrankTrollman wrote:I don't know about you, but my semen is magic. And it can sustain many monster girls.

-Username17

Thank you for sharing that, Frank. I sleep more comfortably at night knowing I no longer have to sustain whole populations of succubi... alone.

After all, I am getting old. Best to pass the tradition of monster-sustenance onto more capable up-and-coming young men.

Cent13

Ganbare Gincun · Post by **Ganbare Gincun** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:03 pm

FrankTrollman wrote:Monster Girls Encyclopedia. Now in Engrish.

-Username17

FrankTrollman wrote:I don't know about you, but my semen is magic. And it can sustain many monster girls.

-Username17

What... what the fuck?

Caedrus · Post by **Caedrus** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:18 pm

Maybe it's just me, but I strongly prefer this kind of image to chainmail bikinis.

I liked the old L5R art. Like so:

And I'm totally fine with nudity or risque images of any sort, as long as it seems like there's actually some kind of excuse for it, rather than pretending that chainmail bikinis are actual protective wear.

Crissa · Post by **Crissa** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:48 pm

I like real armor, too.

But marketing only knows drooling fanboys.

Also, the semen thing is a classic Chinese/Japanese trope; in that it represents the very essence of a person's soul.

Yes, it is very male-biased. But isn't it a great way to die?

-Crissa

CatharzGodfoot · Post by **CatharzGodfoot** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:51 pm

Crissa wrote:I like real armor, too.

But marketing only knows drooling fanboys.

Also, the semen thing is a classic Chinese/Japanese trope; in that it represents the very essence of a person's soul.

Yes, it is very male-biased. But isn't it a great way to die?

-Crissa

Hey now, women have jing too.

Username17 · Post by **Username17** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:56 pm

CatharzGodfoot wrote:
Crissa wrote:I like real armor, too.

But marketing only knows drooling fanboys.

Also, the semen thing is a classic Chinese/Japanese trope; in that it represents the very essence of a person's soul.

Yes, it is very male-biased. But isn't it a great way to die?

-Crissa
Hey now, women have jing too.

But do they have JingJing?

-Username17

Count Arioch the 28th · Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:06 pm

CatharzGodfoot wrote:
Crissa wrote:I like real armor, too.

But marketing only knows drooling fanboys.

Also, the semen thing is a classic Chinese/Japanese trope; in that it represents the very essence of a person's soul.

Yes, it is very male-biased. But isn't it a great way to die?

-Crissa
Hey now, women have jing too.

They do, but theirs is of an infinite supply, while the female version is finite.

And I couldn't think of a worse way to die personally.

Centurion13 · Post by **Centurion13** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:23 pm

Crissa wrote:I like real armor, too.

But marketing only knows drooling fanboys.

Also, the semen thing is a classic Chinese/Japanese trope; in that it represents the very essence of a person's soul.

Yes, it is very male-biased. But isn't it a great way to die?

-Crissa

If I thought I was maybe fathering an heir who would carry on after I was dead, yeah.

But as a boy-toy, a 'resource' to be used and discarded, I think I know a little of how some women might feel in a society dominated by fan-boys.

Cent13

Ganbare Gincun · Post by **Ganbare Gincun** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:30 pm

Crissa wrote:Also, the semen thing is a classic Chinese/Japanese trope; in that it represents the very essence of a person's soul.

This seems familiar somehow...

Lago PARANOIA · Post by **Lago PARANOIA** » Sat Aug 28, 2010 11:03 pm

Crissa wrote:I like real armor, too.

But marketing only knows drooling fanboys.

Hey, I'm not saying that all armor has to be Breast Plates and Chainmail Bikinis. There are quite a few characters who look sweet when they're dolled up in real armor--Leia, Gohan, Saber, etc..

I'm just saying that a lot of the time we should get characters like Red Sonja and Samurai Jack and Franky who often go around fighting half-naked.

Caedrus · Post by **Caedrus** » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:50 am

Samurai Jack I'm fine with, but Red Sonja I'm not. Samurai Jack doesn't wear samurai armor undies. He simply wears setting appropriate undergarments. And being a pervert is a running gag for Franky.

Crissa · Post by **Crissa** » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:52 am

He still often runs around in his undies.

-Crissa

Caedrus · Post by **Caedrus** » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:56 am

Crissa wrote:He still often runs around in his undies.

-Crissa

I realize this. The point is that he doesn't pretend it's armor or anything stupid like that. It's just actually setting appropriate undergarments.

Good

What the fuck?

Leress · Post by **Leress** » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:57 am

Caedrus wrote:Samurai Jack I'm fine with, but Red Sonja I'm not. Samurai Jack doesn't wear samurai armor undies. And being a pervert is a running gag for Franky.

*coughs*

Caedrus · Post by **Caedrus** » Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:18 am

My problem isn't with whether people wear revealing clothing (or even if they wear anything at all), it has to do with characters who are dressed really obviously absurdly for the sole purpose of titillation, outside of any in-story context, often even at the expense of story if need be (For example, the Fanservice Girl character never, ever having her stripperific costume she wears all the time commented on in an RPG, even if such things are commented on for other people when plot appropriate). Likewise, this wouldn't be an issue to me if it were in something that is *about* sexualization, like porn. But D&D isn't that.

Chainmail bikinis fall into this category. It's always out of place and it dehumanizes any character that's wearing one.