The appropriate amount of sexual content in D&D.

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Ganbare Gincun
Duke
Posts: 1022
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:42 am

Post by Ganbare Gincun »

What the fuck is up with Ivy's tits? Her rack has exploded in size since she was first introduced. Good god.
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by Crissa »

Strangely, male PCs end up looking less often like Jack and more often like nanuk, while female ones look more like red sonja than vice versa...

-Crissa
Caedrus
Knight-Baron
Posts: 728
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Caedrus »

Ganbare Gincun wrote:What the fuck is up with Ivy's tits? Her rack has exploded in size since she was first introduced. Good god.
The same has happened to a lot of characters in the Soul Edge/Calibur series. The sexualization of the female cast has upped significantly with every new game, and in 4 it's just ridiculous.
Last edited by Caedrus on Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Count Arioch the 28th
King
Posts: 6172
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Count Arioch the 28th »

It's really a shame, that used to be my favorite fighting game.
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

Caedrus wrote: And being a pervert is a running gag for Franky.
Franky, even when he's just being his normal cyborg self, still runs around in an unbuttoned Hawaiian shirt and a speedo. Even in the snow.
Caedrus wrote: Chainmail bikinis fall into this category. It's always out of place and it dehumanizes any character that's wearing one.
So it's okay for your character to be a nudist or run around in combat lingerie but not in chainmail bikinis?
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
User avatar
Josh_Kablack
King
Posts: 5318
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Online. duh

Post by Josh_Kablack »

Chainmail bikinis fall into this category. It's always out of place and it dehumanizes any character that's wearing one.
Counterpoint: Makri in the Thraxas books.

She wears the chianmail bikini solely to increase the tips she earns as a barmaid in to help fund her courses at the Guild College and the secret intrigues that the Association of Gentlewomen works to wear away at the patriarchial order in Turai.

Yeah, it's a bit of self-referential winking at the fantasy trope of the chainmail bikini, but it's not really out-of-place and it actually helps to humanize an otherwise superhuman character.
"But transportation issues are social-justice issues. The toll of bad transit policies and worse infrastructure—trains and buses that don’t run well and badly serve low-income neighborhoods, vehicular traffic that pollutes the environment and endangers the lives of cyclists and pedestrians—is borne disproportionately by black and brown communities."
Caedrus
Knight-Baron
Posts: 728
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Caedrus »

Josh_Kablack wrote:
Chainmail bikinis fall into this category. It's always out of place and it dehumanizes any character that's wearing one.
Counterpoint: Makri in the Thraxas books.

She wears the chianmail bikini solely to increase the tips she earns as a barmaid in to help fund her courses at the Guild College and the secret intrigues that the Association of Gentlewomen works to wear away at the patriarchial order in Turai.

Yeah, it's a bit of self-referential winking at the fantasy trope of the chainmail bikini, but it's not really out-of-place and it actually helps to humanize an otherwise superhuman character.
Well sure, but that's not the way it's used in, for example, Red Sonja. In Makri's case it's actually included in the story for a reason. It doesn't really change my point at all: The problem isn't with the attire itself, but rather the context (or lack thereof) for it. If it makes you any happier, I'll say "chainmail bikinis almost always fall into this category."
Last edited by Caedrus on Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:49 am, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
Leress
Prince
Posts: 2770
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Leress »

Caedrus wrote:
Well sure, but that's not the way it's used in, for example, Red Sonja. In Makri's case it's actually included in the story for a reason. It doesn't really change my point at all.
That means that your statement is poorly written.
Caedrus
Knight-Baron
Posts: 728
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Caedrus »

Leress wrote:That means that your statement is poorly written.
Oh boy, I used the word "always" instead of "almost always." As if people don't do that for all sorts of things. People don't typically mean "literally everyone knows that Fighters suck" when they say "Everyone knows Fighters suck" for example.
Leress wrote:It's not only the problem of using the word "always" instead of "almost always" it is also you said that it always dehumanizes the person doing it.
Unexplained nonsensical sexualized attire that lacks any kind of appropriate context is out of place and dehumanizes the character. Chainmail bikinis usually fall into this category (but might not in the case of, say, a person wearing a costume for the express purpose of arousing customers to get more tips in the context of the story). Better?

(Edited since Leress deleted his reply after I responded to it...)
Last edited by Caedrus on Sun Aug 29, 2010 4:46 am, edited 3 times in total.
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

Caedrus wrote:The problem isn't with the attire itself, but rather the context (or lack thereof) for it.
They're wearing it because it's titillating to the invisible viewer. Not because it's comfortable or protective or honorable or whatever, but strictly because it's titillating.

That a good enough reason? That straightforward enough?
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
User avatar
Leress
Prince
Posts: 2770
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Leress »

Caedrus wrote:
(Edited since Leress deleted his reply after I responded to it...)
I did that since I read your post from the previous page.
Caedrus
Knight-Baron
Posts: 728
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Caedrus »

Leress wrote:
Caedrus wrote:
(Edited since Leress deleted his reply after I responded to it...)
I did that since I read your post from the previous page.
Ah, I see.

But it seems like someone else didn't...
Lago PARANOIA wrote:
Caedrus wrote:The problem isn't with the attire itself, but rather the context (or lack thereof) for it.
They're wearing it because it's titillating to the invisible viewer. Not because it's comfortable or protective or honorable or whatever, but strictly because it's titillating.

That a good enough reason? That straightforward enough?
Lago, learn to read. That falls pretty straightforwardly into the category I described.
My problem isn't with whether people wear revealing clothing (or even if they wear anything at all), it has to do with characters who are dressed really obviously absurdly for the sole purpose of titillation, outside of any in-story context, often even at the expense of story if need be (For example, the Fanservice Girl character never, ever having her stripperific costume she wears all the time commented on in an RPG, even if such things are commented on for other people when plot appropriate). Likewise, this wouldn't be an issue to me if it were in something that is *about* sexualization, like porn. But D&D isn't that.
Last I checked, "the invisible viewer" wasn't part of the setting context in D&D.[/b]
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:It's really a shame, that used to be my favorite fighting game.
Yeah, I really enjoyed Soul Edge.
User avatar
Maj
Prince
Posts: 4705
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Shelton, Washington, USA

Post by Maj »

Caedrus wrote:Maybe it's just me, but I strongly prefer this kind of image to chainmail bikinis.

Image
Mmm... Sometimes. I discovered recently, though, that I have a personal bias against [most] images of chicks with short hair. That one is OK, though.
Caedrus wrote:rather than pretending that chainmail bikinis are actual protective wear.
In a world where wearing a ring somehow protects you better, I have no problem believing that the chainmail bikini actually does something. This isn't to say that I think every character should be wearing one, just that it's more justifiable than you give it credit for.
Last edited by Maj on Sun Aug 29, 2010 6:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
K
King
Posts: 6487
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by K »

I've always thought the easiest solution for the chain-mail bikini was the simple argument that:

A. Magic armor doesn't need a lot of material since it protects you with force fields, and...

B. Dirty old man Wizards make the bulk of magic armor.
User avatar
malak
Master
Posts: 264
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 11:10 pm

Post by malak »

Caedrus wrote:Chainmail bikinis fall into this category. It's always out of place and it dehumanizes any character that's wearing one.
What kind of prude backwards attitude is this? 'dehumanizes' o.O

Welcome to the 19th century.
Last edited by malak on Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Prak
Serious Badass
Posts: 17349
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Prak »

K wrote:I've always thought the easiest solution for the chain-mail bikini was the simple argument that:

A. Magic armor doesn't need a lot of material since it protects you with force fields, and...

B. Dirty old man Wizards make the bulk of magic armor.
Not to mention we're talking about a game where if someone got the most protective benefit out of wearing a duck on his head, he'd, at least, seriously consider the option.
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.

You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

I personally think that boobs generally "humanize" people. To the point where when people put boobs onto lizard people I'm like "Stop anthropomorphizing those guys so damn much!" I really have no problem with people dressing for "rule of cool" rather than practicality in fantasy.

I like boobs.

-Username17
Koumei
Serious Badass
Posts: 13879
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: South Ausfailia

Post by Koumei »

Boobs are awesome.

And if chainmail bikinis have to go, then my vote goes to Greek style, with naked boobs.
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

Koumei wrote:And if chainmail bikinis have to go, then my vote goes to Greek style, with naked boobs.
They can have my chainmail bikini when they pry it off my cold, dead penis. :saywhat:
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
User avatar
Count Arioch the 28th
King
Posts: 6172
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Count Arioch the 28th »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:
Koumei wrote:And if chainmail bikinis have to go, then my vote goes to Greek style, with naked boobs.
They can have my chainmail bikini when they pry it off my cold, dead penis. :saywhat:
Thanks for the visual :shocked:
In this moment, I am Ur-phoric. Not because of any phony god’s blessing. But because, I am enlightened by my int score.
User avatar
CatharzGodfoot
King
Posts: 5668
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by CatharzGodfoot »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:
Koumei wrote:And if chainmail bikinis have to go, then my vote goes to Greek style, with naked boobs.
They can have my chainmail bikini when they pry it off my cold, dead penis. :saywhat:
Men, this is why you shouldn't try to masturbate with somebody's chainmail bikini. It will have to be pried off your cold, dead penis.
The law in its majestic equality forbids the rich as well as the poor from stealing bread, begging and sleeping under bridges.
-Anatole France

Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.

-Josh Kablack

User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by Crissa »

Prak, have you played Dokapon?

-Crissa
User avatar
Prak
Serious Badass
Posts: 17349
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Prak »

Koumei wrote:Boobs are awesome.

And if chainmail bikinis have to go, then my vote goes to Greek style, with naked boobs.
I vote for full Greek style, with naked boobs and naked men a la 300. The reaping mauler should totally be some super fit guy wearing nothing.

Crissa: Nope. And I know nothing about it, either, explain?
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.

You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
User avatar
CatharzGodfoot
King
Posts: 5668
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: North Carolina

Post by CatharzGodfoot »

Prak_Anima wrote: I vote for full Greek style, with naked boobs and naked men a la 300. The reaping mauler should totally be some super fit guy wearing nothing.
Full Greek style. Nothing but a
Nebuchadnezzar wrote:kynodesme
The law in its majestic equality forbids the rich as well as the poor from stealing bread, begging and sleeping under bridges.
-Anatole France

Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.

-Josh Kablack

User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Post by Crissa »

There's a duck you can put on your head in it. Doesn't change your game stats, though, so no one keeps it. But they all try it if they find it, because that is worth points.

-Crissa
Post Reply