Essence wrote:I've also noted that we seem shy a Rogue.
*ahem*
Moderator: Moderators
Essence wrote:I've also noted that we seem shy a Rogue.
You sorta could. If you took that Roguish feat from the Aberrations-R-Us book that lets your Hide/MS skills apply to Tremorsense, Blindsight, Blindsense, etc.MrWaeseL at [unixtime wrote:1120594333[/unixtime]]4) Scout: I can hide and sneak, but not actually go invisible.
Carcharoth wrote:It occurs to me that hitting stuff is lots of fun, but Kirin will hit stuff
Kirin_Corrigan at [unixtime wrote:1120600074[/unixtime]]
I sure will (at least, I sure hope so), but it works better if I actually get someone to pair up with for flanking purposes (3.5 whip is a melee weapon, after all, and I get to deal an extra 1d6 of damage while flanking) and the usual strategies: stopping the opposition from concentrating on a single target ( me ), granting a better coverage of the second lines and having someone close to take advantage of and make AoO on those I'll succeed in tripping (a Kick'em while they're down partner would be pretty neat...).
If Frank lets us use Metamagick Rods, use a cheapo Extend Spell Rod.DBB wrote:I am really torn on what to take for the 9th level feat, and am waffling among Exalted Wild Shape, Extend Spell (mostly for almost-all-day Greater Magic Fang), or some other summoning-related feat -- some variant on Beckon the Frozen from Frostburn is attractive. Advice is extremely appreciated.
dbb wrote:For reference, a Brown Bear conjured by Mia averages 75 hp, AC 22 with fast healing 3 and DR 10/magic and slashing. It grapples at +28 and has a full attack of 2 claws at +20/1d8+13 and 1 bite at +15/2d6+6. That's not in the league of a real PC fighter,
Essence at [unixtime wrote:1120613062[/unixtime]]
Actually, I've been pondering my original idea, and I think I've come up with something interesting. It seems that a Hexblade would be quite appropriate for the curse-heavy Aztec/Incan environment, and a Hexblade/Divine Crusader/Geomancer would made an interesting build. IDHMBIFOM, though, so I can't check the prereqs or anything. Still, if I can rig it, I'll go for it.
Deirdre wrote:far enough away to be "country folk" in the eyes of people who live in the city,
Neeek wrote:I seem to be having trouble figuring out what sorts of PrCs I can qualify for at all. Do "See the Unseen" and "Voidsense" count as divinations for the purposes of qualifying for Divine Oracle or Fatespinner, for example?
Wrenfield at [unixtime wrote:1120603984[/unixtime]]Kirin & Mr. W.,
You guys will have *plenty* of help getting viable flankers for your attack strategies.
MRW wrote: But if anyone knows an easy way to get ranged flanking from straight rogue I'm all ears.
Kirin wrote:I sure will (at least, I sure hope so), but it works better if I actually get someone to pair up with for flanking purposes (3.5 whip is a melee weapon, after all, and I get to deal an extra 1d6 of damage while flanking) and the usual strategies:
FrankTrollman wrote:Note, the 3.5 Whip is a melee weapon, but has the special rule that it doesn't threten squares, which means that it can't ever flank. Of course, that's retarded. I honestly don't see what the big deal is with people taking a weapon that threatens a lof enemies. It's virtually useless for anything except obscure special combat manuvers unless you sink a bunch of class features into it.
If you want to flank with a Whip, go for it. But remember, that's a house rule. The 3.5 PhB says no flanking with a Whip.
Wrenfield at [unixtime wrote:1120723813[/unixtime]]
Otherwise, it's like spitting out a 1st level spell every time with the EB.
Correct me if I am wrong on this though.
Wrenfield wrote:The caster level of your Eldritch Blast ... is like ... real low. Right?
Neeek wrote:none of the blasts I *could* get are worth losing Flight, Invis, or an AoE attack spell (that doesn't count as an attack spell for Invis) to me.
Invisibility, PHB wrote:For the purposes of this spell, an attack includes any spell targetting a foe or whose area or effect includes a foe
FrankTrollman at [unixtime wrote:1120753649[/unixtime]]Neeek wrote:none of the blasts I *could* get are worth losing Flight, Invis, or an AoE attack spell (that doesn't count as an attack spell for Invis) to me.
If you cast a spell with an area effect, and that are includes a foe, that counts as an attack for the purposes of Invisibility.