I don't like to pull out the grammar stick, but the "you" there actually is an accusative. You're referring to someone else and telling them to stop pissing you off.Occluded Sun wrote: And, of course, there are more important things in life than not pissing people off. If you disagree, feel free to stop talking in order not to piss us off. The rest of us will be trying to have intelligent (or at least witty) discussions.
[Non-political] News that makes you Laugh/Cry/Both...
Moderator: Moderators
- Ancient History
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 12708
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm
- Occluded Sun
- Duke
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 6:15 pm
1) The grammatical accusative, and accusation, have very little to do with each other. The link between them is pretty much free association, frankly. That is not a worthy argument for you to make.
2) I am not, in fact, telling anyone to do anything. Read the statement more carefully. I am inviting one person in particular (and, in practice, anyone who holds the position that person is advocating) to feel free to apply that principle to themselves and their own actions.
There is an inherent danger in perambulating through the marketplace of ideas: sooner or later, we're likely to encounter positions and arguments that we find personally offensive. The responsible thing that mature and sane people do is acknowledge this and pass by. As long as the ideas are expressed courteously, we don't have a justification in preventing them from being made.
People like to use "I'm offended" as a weapon. It is particularly useful for their purposes because it doesn't require them to conduct any analysis or find any flaw in the position itself.
2) I am not, in fact, telling anyone to do anything. Read the statement more carefully. I am inviting one person in particular (and, in practice, anyone who holds the position that person is advocating) to feel free to apply that principle to themselves and their own actions.
There is an inherent danger in perambulating through the marketplace of ideas: sooner or later, we're likely to encounter positions and arguments that we find personally offensive. The responsible thing that mature and sane people do is acknowledge this and pass by. As long as the ideas are expressed courteously, we don't have a justification in preventing them from being made.
People like to use "I'm offended" as a weapon. It is particularly useful for their purposes because it doesn't require them to conduct any analysis or find any flaw in the position itself.
"Most men are of no more use in their lives but as machines for turning food into excrement." - Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci
- Ancient History
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 12708
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm
You did actually make an accusation, which is the point. Moreover, it's an accusation which applies equally to you but which you refuse to acknowledge. Case in point:Occluded Sun wrote:1) The grammatical accusative, and accusation, have very little to do with each other. The link between them is pretty much free association, frankly. That is not a worthy argument for you to make.
2) I am not, in fact, telling anyone to do anything. Read the statement more carefully. I am inviting one person in particular (and, in practice, anyone who holds the position that person is advocating) to feel free to apply that principle to themselves and their own actions.
So the real question is: why don't you shut the fuck up?There is an inherent danger in perambulating through the marketplace of ideas: sooner or later, we're likely to encounter positions and arguments that we find personally offensive. The responsible thing that mature and sane people do is acknowledge this and pass by. As long as the ideas are expressed courteously, we don't have a justification in preventing them from being made.
People like to use "I'm offended" as a weapon. It is particularly useful for their purposes because it doesn't require them to conduct any analysis or find any flaw in the position itself.
- Occluded Sun
- Duke
- Posts: 1044
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2014 6:15 pm
Wait wait wait. Did fucking Occluded Sun actually talking about "the rest of us" trying to have intelligent/witty conversations? He sure as hell is not contributing towards intelligence or wit in conversations. The best he can manage is to attract barbs of criticism.
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
Gary Gygax wrote:The player’s path to role-playing mastery begins with a thorough understanding of the rules of the game
Bigode wrote:I wouldn't normally make that blanket of a suggestion, but you seem to deserve it: scroll through the entire forum, read anything that looks interesting in term of design experience, then come back.
I don't know if I'd call Silva a troll. "Your favourite game is dumb and you should feel dumb" is usually not the reaction trolls are trying to get out of people. Now, maybe he's a masochist, sure, but I think it's more that he's just stubborn and loyal to a bad game because he really like the setting (which is bad and he should feel bad) but I don't think he's a troll.tussock wrote:Silva is a thing. There are a bunch of people who believe what they're saying and also know that the only thing they're going to achieve is to piss people off by saying it. When that reaction amuses them, or arouses them, or makes them angry, or gets any sort of "rush" feedback, folk get hooked on it.
That's what makes them trolls. Silva loves when people tell him his pet game is shit, because of the blood pressure and pulse rate increase, and associated feeling of moral superiority. He's a troll. It's a thing. Even though he really does like the game.
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.
You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
Also possible. Permissible, even.
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.
You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
- Ancient History
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 12708
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1854
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:21 am
DSMatticus wrote:Again, look at this fucking map you moron. Take your finger and trace each country's coast, then trace its claim line. Even you - and I say that as someone who could not think less of your intelligence - should be able to tell that one of these things is not like the other.
Kaelik wrote:I invented saying mean things about Tussock.
On the one hand, I guess we should name them all male names then to save the death toll.
On the other hand, the people who die in both types are victims, but do we really care about the extra people that die from female named hurricanes?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Re: Gender-named Hurricanes.
I heard that the difference was an artefact of the change in naming systems. Apparently, when you do the test (excluding the massive outlier, Katrina) on just the ones before or after the point that they changed the naming system, the correlation goes away.
[edit]Source for my hearing... (has its own sources and references, which I cba to replicate here)
I heard that the difference was an artefact of the change in naming systems. Apparently, when you do the test (excluding the massive outlier, Katrina) on just the ones before or after the point that they changed the naming system, the correlation goes away.
[edit]Source for my hearing... (has its own sources and references, which I cba to replicate here)
Last edited by Fwib on Tue Jun 03, 2014 8:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- King
- Posts: 5271
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:32 am
So, the article you're linking to summarizes Jeff Lazo's criticisms of the study, and they aren't really what you think they were. They are also really weak and bullshitty. His complaints are as follows:Fwib wrote:Re: Gender-named Hurricanes.
I heard that the difference was an artefact of the change in naming systems. Apparently, when you do the test (excluding the massive outlier, Katrina) on just the ones before or after the point that they changed the naming system, the correlation goes away.
[edit]Source for my hearing... (has its own sources and references, which I cba to replicate here)
1) The data set includes the period from 1950-1979, when all hurricanes had female names. This is true, but the study doesn't actually use a simple binary male/female classification. It rates names on a scale of 1 to 11 based on their perceived femininity/masculinity (consider Diane vs Fern), and then finds a correlation between that value and the hurricane's death toll. There are potential problems with this, but Lazo doesn't point them out.
2) Hurricanes have been getting less fatal over time, so the 29 years of all female names from 1950-1979 biases the sample. This is actually not true at all. You can just go grab the dataset they used (it's not behind a paywall/academic wall/whatever) and calculate the correlation yourself - it's just not there.
3) The study includes indirect deaths. Of course it fucking does! Deaths caused by fatal car accidents are classified as indirect. Deaths caused by the loss of access to emergency services are classified as indirect. Deaths caused by sitting in a room next to a generator slowly killing you with carbon monoxide are classified as indirect. All kinds of deaths which are totally and completely the hurricane's fault are classified as indirect.
4) Lazo complains "sure, in the portion of your experiment where you had people evaluate the potential danger of hypothetical hurricanes while changing their names around, participants reliably assessed male-named hurricanes as more dangerous than female-named hurricanes... but what if college students and psych study volunteers are really sexist, and the people who live on the coast (you know, in places like Texas and Florida) totally aren't?" No, really. That was one of his arguments.
The study does have problems. The biggest is that hurricane death tolls are a dataset driven by outliers, and depending on how you handle them you can get completely different results. You can argue at length that they handled outliers inappropriately and are essentially just picking up random noise, or that the way they handled outliers biased the study towards their conclusion, or blah blah blah.
Also: you can totally attack both the notion and specifics of how they classified the feminity/masculinity of the names. It's a semi-sketchy way to bridge the pre-1979 and post-1979 dataset, and you can make a compelling case that it does not actually let them combine the datasets in a way that gives them the statistical significane they claim.
But Lazo's complaints were really bad.
-
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 29894
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Actually, the entire body of work about the femininity of names is bullshit and should be treated as such. If you ask a bunch of people how feminine a list of names sound to them, that tells you - at best - about the gender assignments of names today. But the all-female name list was before 1979. For fuck's sake, until the early sixties Kim was a boy's name.
How masculine or feminine a name is changes every decade. How feminine people in 2014 think a name sounds obviously cannot possibly have had any relevance to how people prepared or failed to prepare for a hurricane with that name in 1955.
All the data previous to 1979 is bullshit. None of those data points mean shit and none of them can possibly mean shit. No one asked people in the 1950s to rank those hurricane names in order of perceived masculinity, and people from different generations with different name admixtures in their cohort cannot meaningfully fill in that data.
If you drop all the pre-1979 data, the p values aren't good enough to refute the null hypothesis. You have to drop all the pre-1979 data because it is bullshit. Therefore they don't have enough data points to make a compelling argument that they aren't just looking at purely random noisy data.
-Username17
How masculine or feminine a name is changes every decade. How feminine people in 2014 think a name sounds obviously cannot possibly have had any relevance to how people prepared or failed to prepare for a hurricane with that name in 1955.
All the data previous to 1979 is bullshit. None of those data points mean shit and none of them can possibly mean shit. No one asked people in the 1950s to rank those hurricane names in order of perceived masculinity, and people from different generations with different name admixtures in their cohort cannot meaningfully fill in that data.
If you drop all the pre-1979 data, the p values aren't good enough to refute the null hypothesis. You have to drop all the pre-1979 data because it is bullshit. Therefore they don't have enough data points to make a compelling argument that they aren't just looking at purely random noisy data.
-Username17
- Stahlseele
- King
- Posts: 5988
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:51 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
http://globalnews.ca/news/1370512/12-ye ... an-attack/
how much do we want to bet that they are going to lay all of the blame on video games again?
how much do we want to bet that they are going to lay all of the blame on video games again?
Welcome, to IronHell.
Shrapnel wrote:TFwiki wrote:Soon is the name of the region in the time-domain (familiar to all marketing departments, and to the moderators and staff of Fun Publications) which sees release of all BotCon news, club exclusives, and other fan desirables. Soon is when then will become now.
Peculiar properties of spacetime ensure that the perception of the magnitude of Soon is fluid and dependent, not on an individual's time-reference, but on spatial and cultural location. A marketer generally perceives Soon as a finite, known, yet unspeakable time-interval; to a fan, the interval appears greater, and may in fact approach the infinite, becoming Never. Once the interval has passed, however, a certain time-lensing effect seems to occur, and the time-interval becomes vanishingly small. We therefore see the strange result that the same fragment of spacetime may be observed, in quick succession, as Soon, Never, and All Too Quickly.
Well, friendship is magic.the girls had been planning to kill their friend for months
The other girl said she sees Slender Man in her dreams. She said he watches her and can read her mind and teleport.
Gary Gygax wrote:The player’s path to role-playing mastery begins with a thorough understanding of the rules of the game
Bigode wrote:I wouldn't normally make that blanket of a suggestion, but you seem to deserve it: scroll through the entire forum, read anything that looks interesting in term of design experience, then come back.
-
- Knight-Baron
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:24 am
Isn't it much more likely that the combined belief of the people of the internet caused slenderman to spontaneously pop into existence?
Kaelik wrote:Fuck you Haruhi is clearly the best moe anime, and we will argue about how Haruhi and Nagato are OP and um... that girl with blond hair? is for shitters.darkmaster wrote:Tgdmb.moe, like the gaming den, but we all yell at eachother about wich lucky star character is the cutest.
If you like Lucky Star then I will explain in great detail why Lucky Star is the a shitty shitty anime for shitty shitty people, and how the characters have no interesting abilities at all, and everything is poorly designed especially the skill challenges.
- Stahlseele
- King
- Posts: 5988
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:51 pm
- Location: Hamburg, Germany
Not nearly enough narrativum
Welcome, to IronHell.
Shrapnel wrote:TFwiki wrote:Soon is the name of the region in the time-domain (familiar to all marketing departments, and to the moderators and staff of Fun Publications) which sees release of all BotCon news, club exclusives, and other fan desirables. Soon is when then will become now.
Peculiar properties of spacetime ensure that the perception of the magnitude of Soon is fluid and dependent, not on an individual's time-reference, but on spatial and cultural location. A marketer generally perceives Soon as a finite, known, yet unspeakable time-interval; to a fan, the interval appears greater, and may in fact approach the infinite, becoming Never. Once the interval has passed, however, a certain time-lensing effect seems to occur, and the time-interval becomes vanishingly small. We therefore see the strange result that the same fragment of spacetime may be observed, in quick succession, as Soon, Never, and All Too Quickly.
I watch a few of the Slender series on YouTube.Stahlseele wrote:Not nearly enough narrativum
Not only is this a hideous crime, it's an idiotic one. These girls--who would have seen and read the same stuff as me--somehow missed the fact that you don't pick the Slender Man, the Slender Man picks you. Coupla the series even have a cult that worships him, and he usually attacks 'em when he runs into them. SO EVEN IF YOU THINK THE SERIES ARE REAL, trying to deliberately seek him out doesn't work.
Last edited by Maxus on Sun Jun 08, 2014 3:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
He jumps like a damned dragoon, and charges into battle fighting rather insane monsters with little more than his bare hands and rather nasty spell effects conjured up solely through knowledge and the local plantlife. He unerringly knows where his goal lies, he breathes underwater and is untroubled by space travel, seems to have no limits to his actual endurance and favors killing his enemies by driving both boots square into their skull. His agility is unmatched, and his strength legendary, able to fling about a turtle shell big enough to contain a man with enough force to barrel down a near endless path of unfortunates.
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
--The horror of Mario
Zak S, Zak Smith, Dndwithpornstars, Zak Sabbath. He is a terrible person and a hack at writing and art. His cultural contributions are less than Justin Bieber's, and he's a shitmuffin. Go go gadget Googlebomb!
- angelfromanotherpin
- Overlord
- Posts: 9745
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
One more step towards our glorious robot overlords.[/url]
Reading the chat logs, it's sadly not as impressive as it sounds. It's choppy, makes strange conversational jumps, and responds to confusion by changing the subject. It likely only passed the test because it was pretending to be a foreign teenager.
DSMatticus wrote:It's not just that everything you say is stupid, but that they are Gordian knots of stupid that leave me completely bewildered as to where to even begin. After hearing you speak Alexander the Great would stab you and triumphantly declare the puzzle solved.
-
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 29894
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
All of that, plus only one third of the people were fooled. You can do better than that with a Chinese Room.Reading the chat logs, it's sadly not as impressive as it sounds. It's choppy, makes strange conversational jumps, and responds to confusion by changing the subject. It likely only passed the test because it was pretending to be a foreign teenager.
-Username17