The Shadowrun Situation

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

A Man In Black
Duke
Posts: 1040
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:33 am

Post by A Man In Black »

Stahlseele wrote:If they are not mounted on horses anymore, are they still called mounties? O.o
For the same reason that the United States Marine Corps still have that name despite no longer being (chiefly) naval infantry. Tradition.
FrankTrollman wrote:You are being completely irrational in your assessment of horses. For fuck's sake, your from England right? Before you shoot your mouth off some more, read up on London's own explanation.
Hey, let's look at more than that site than just the first hit on Google for "mounted police", hm?

Turns out the Metropolitan Police Service is just shy of 33,000 strong, with more park rangers than mounted police. There's less than one mounted officer for each police station in London. Looking at duties, it seems that they're used as much for PR situations like school visits and ceremonial duties as much as policing, and that the mounted branch is chiefly known for a horse show that chiefly serves as a PR/recruiting tool.

Mounted police are marginal, and today seem to be chiefly used out of tradition as much as anything.
User avatar
Lokathor
Duke
Posts: 2185
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:10 am
Location: ID
Contact:

Post by Lokathor »

TheFlatline wrote:I've yet to meet anyone who has actually, seriously ran an adventure off of a PDF on a laptop, so we're going to gloss over that option.
I run pre-made adventures exclusively from PDF copies of the adventure...

Except The Sunless Citadel, which I purchased, and Return To The Temple Of Elemental Evil, which I got used but then never seriously ran.
[*]The Ends Of The Matrix: Github and Rendered
[*]After Sundown: Github and Rendered
crizh
Apprentice
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 6:41 pm
Location: Scotland

Post by crizh »

A Man In Black wrote: Hey, let's look at more than that site than just the first hit on Google for "mounted police", hm?

Looking at duties, it seems that they're used as much for PR situations like school visits and ceremonial duties as much as policing, and that the mounted branch is chiefly known for a horse show that chiefly serves as a PR/recruiting tool.

Mounted police are marginal, and today seem to be chiefly used out of tradition as much as anything.
The same pages also mention that during the season they attend 2 or 3 football matches per week. I think 2 or 3 massive potential riots per week is a pretty hefty workload and is far from a ceremonial role.

They reckon that a mounted officer is as effective as a dozen officers on foot at such events. Which means the Met is capable of projecting a force of approximately 2000 coppers to such events without coming over like the fucking Gestapo turning up mob handed spoiling for trouble.

The footage I was talking about early included a football match and the presence of the horse actually seemed to diffuse tension. The punters like the horses, they bring them apples and sugar cubes and come over to pet them. I imagine they would react differently to a dozen plod in full riot gear.

Christ, I'm sure I had some sort of point to make. Crowd control is a big and important job and I don't think that this will be any less the case in the Sixth World.

And no you can't use Freeze Foam on a fucking crowd to prevent it kicking off in the first place. That sort of gear is for when the faeces has already struck the rotating blades.
Trust The Computer, The Computer is your friend.
Doom
Duke
Posts: 1470
Joined: Mon Nov 10, 2008 7:52 pm
Location: Baton Rouge

Post by Doom »

Statistics in a vacuum are so dangerous. Now, they have 120 horses, and this is said to be too small a number to have any relevance, and use of horses is dying out.

In 1805 the police force had 50 horses....so much for dying out, I'll let someone else check to see how much more population London has now as opposed to then (but London's been a major city for a LONG time).

So, it's pretty clear to me that horses have always had some, limited, use in actual police work, although if nature of the work changes dramatically (eg, Mounties, or cavalry units that are now tank units), they might well be eliminated entirely.

There are 250 dogs in London's police force, up from 172 in 1914.
Last edited by Doom on Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

...I'm taking bets on how many pages it takes before the topic shifts to the (in)feasibility of using unicorn mounts inside.

...Oh wait...
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
User avatar
Ganbare Gincun
Duke
Posts: 1022
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:42 am

Post by Ganbare Gincun »

A Man In Black wrote:Mounted police are marginal, and today seem to be chiefly used out of tradition as much as anything.
This article is a few years old, but I think it sums up why police departments want to retain mounted units fairly well. They aren't a magical panacea for crime, but they are a valuable law enforcement tool that shouldn't be dismissed.
User avatar
Lokathor
Duke
Posts: 2185
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:10 am
Location: ID
Contact:

Post by Lokathor »

Ganbare Gincun wrote:
A Man In Black wrote:Mounted police are marginal, and today seem to be chiefly used out of tradition as much as anything.
This article is a few years old, but I think it sums up why police departments want to retain mounted units fairly well. They aren't a magical panacea for crime, but they are a valuable law enforcement tool that shouldn't be dismissed.
All other things considered, it's very hard to argue with a simple 10 nuyen a day upkeep.
[*]The Ends Of The Matrix: Github and Rendered
[*]After Sundown: Github and Rendered
User avatar
Neurosis
Duke
Posts: 1057
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:28 pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?

Post by Neurosis »

theye1 wrote:The whole situation is freaking insane, not even a fucking a wrist slap for stealing 1 million dollars? From outsider perspective, It seems almost certain that other members of the company are involved or they're gullible morons. To be honest I am leaning towards the latter, you've got to be a fucking moron to embrace a person who burned you so badly.

On a separate note, how would go about a job application for senior management position for Catalyst Game Labs? I've got a mortgage to pay off.

edit: Sorry to come back, but it fucking bugs me that Loren L. Coleman is still involved with company even after basically admitting to either embezzlement or criminal incompetence. Either fucking way, he shouldn't be anywhere near the fucking company.
This thread is about unicorn cops now, get back on topic. :tongue:
Zinegata
Prince
Posts: 4071
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:33 am

Post by Zinegata »

Doom wrote:Statistics in a vacuum are so dangerous. Now, they have 120 horses, and this is said to be too small a number to have any relevance, and use of horses is dying out.

In 1805 the police force had 50 horses....so much for dying out, I'll let someone else check to see how much more population London has now as opposed to then (but London's been a major city for a LONG time).
For someone who wails about "not using statistics in a vacuum", you're also falling victim to it.

Firstly, yes, the site states that they only had 50 horses in 1805. But how big was the London Police force back then?

Well...

http://www.met.police.uk/history/timeline1829-1849.htm

The total police force back in 1830 was just 3,300 dudes. And they only became 3,300 after a "considerable increase".

So while the number of horses have doubled, the number of police officers have increased tenfold since then (plus another 20,000 staff and support crews).

Really, you're now deliberately using statistics in a dishonest manner.
So, it's pretty clear to me that horses have always had some, limited, use in actual police work, although if nature of the work changes dramatically (eg, Mounties, or cavalry units that are now tank units), they might well be eliminated entirely.
Again, you're arguing against the people who are pointing out that mounted units only have limited use. In short, you're arguing against the people making the very argument you claim to champion.

Again, only Frank is arguing that they are currently hugely useful (proven totally and conclusively false). Stop sucking his cock.
Last edited by Zinegata on Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
TheFlatline
Prince
Posts: 2606
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:43 pm

Post by TheFlatline »

Lokathor wrote:
TheFlatline wrote:I've yet to meet anyone who has actually, seriously ran an adventure off of a PDF on a laptop, so we're going to gloss over that option.
I run pre-made adventures exclusively from PDF copies of the adventure...

Except The Sunless Citadel, which I purchased, and Return To The Temple Of Elemental Evil, which I got used but then never seriously ran.
I'll stand corrected. Some people do run adventures off of a laptop/PC.

But it makes my head hurt thinking about it. I have trouble using OCR/search-capable PDFs for reference during game time. I can just see the DM looking at what's behind the door we open, when he gets an IM from his girlfriend, and spends 3 or 4 minutes chatting with her while we wait.
User avatar
Pixels
Knight
Posts: 430
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:06 pm

Post by Pixels »

TheFlatline wrote:I'll stand corrected. Some people do run adventures off of a laptop/PC.

But it makes my head hurt thinking about it. I have trouble using OCR/search-capable PDFs for reference during game time. I can just see the DM looking at what's behind the door we open, when he gets an IM from his girlfriend, and spends 3 or 4 minutes chatting with her while we wait.
We have a lot of people in our games. The Storyteller has no time to dally when he's juggling eight runners. Plus we have some scripts for keeping track of rolls and initiative and all that jazz, so the computer actually speeds things up noticeably.

On the other hand, the players with laptops tend to be easily distracted.
User avatar
Neurosis
Duke
Posts: 1057
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:28 pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?

Post by Neurosis »

I don't allow laptops at my table when GMing way too distracting, except for me (TO reference PDFs, and to track initiative/health during combat), and even then "nothing not related to the game on the screen, not even minimized" is a fairly firm rule.
Last edited by Neurosis on Wed Sep 15, 2010 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Otakusensei
Master
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 7:32 pm

Post by Otakusensei »

It all depends on the table. We used to have laptop issues, but when they went away people still talked. So I made an effort to focus on any character who's player was talking at least once per session, seems to keep things on track more. I don't mind laptops anymore than I mind cell phones, I just have to be more interesting.

Outside of games I run I keep my character sheets on my laptop and if you don't allow laptops, or an exception for me, I'm out. I feel it's the player's responsibility to pay attention and the GM's responsibility to make sure there's something interesting enough to warrant it. But no group is going to perfect every night and sometimes it's fun to have a brief interlude. However I'll admit that as soon as someone is turning the screen around to show everyone the hilarious thing they found on 4chan, you're basically fucked and need to change strategy.
User avatar
Lokathor
Duke
Posts: 2185
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 2:10 am
Location: ID
Contact:

Post by Lokathor »

TheFlatline wrote:I'll stand corrected. Some people do run adventures off of a laptop/PC.

But it makes my head hurt thinking about it.
Pixels plays in the games I do, and he summed it up pretty well.

Read the adventure once or twice, then note the page with appropriate stat blocks and reference them during the game. Also, read-aloud text can be read directly from the PDF in an accented/silly announcer voice as well. Laptop use is also for initiative management and rolling of dice pools (shadowrun) or step numbers (earthdawn). Pixels also GMs with a laptop, and he does similar things.

The players are easily distracted by their laptops though, so I think i'll be taking those away for a while.
[*]The Ends Of The Matrix: Github and Rendered
[*]After Sundown: Github and Rendered
User avatar
Stahlseele
King
Posts: 5976
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:51 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post by Stahlseele »

mean_liar wrote:STURM! DRANG!
STOMM! DROKK!


Yes, i realize that this comes pretty late, but i just remembered this <.<
Last edited by Stahlseele on Wed Sep 15, 2010 7:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Welcome, to IronHell.
Shrapnel wrote:
TFwiki wrote:Soon is the name of the region in the time-domain (familiar to all marketing departments, and to the moderators and staff of Fun Publications) which sees release of all BotCon news, club exclusives, and other fan desirables. Soon is when then will become now.

Peculiar properties of spacetime ensure that the perception of the magnitude of Soon is fluid and dependent, not on an individual's time-reference, but on spatial and cultural location. A marketer generally perceives Soon as a finite, known, yet unspeakable time-interval; to a fan, the interval appears greater, and may in fact approach the infinite, becoming Never. Once the interval has passed, however, a certain time-lensing effect seems to occur, and the time-interval becomes vanishingly small. We therefore see the strange result that the same fragment of spacetime may be observed, in quick succession, as Soon, Never, and All Too Quickly.
Troll
NPC
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:33 pm

Post by Troll »

http://www.shadowrun4.com/wordpress/wp- ... ostage.jpg


Apparently "Not Getting rid of Coleman" wasn't enough. They're sending him to Conventions to continue "facing" for Shadowrun 4A.

Also, they've managed to be flippant with the companies current troubles, they thought it would be funny to post on the main page of their that they would consider spending money to get Mr. Coleman back from this team of cosplay Shadowrunnners.

Sorry to interrupt the Unicorn debates, I just found this amusingly inappropriate given the Coleman-mixed-finances-debacle.


*Edited because I use BBCode about as effectively as monkeys use hand grenades.
Last edited by Troll on Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Neurosis
Duke
Posts: 1057
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:28 pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?

Post by Neurosis »

Troll: Beat me to it.

I was just about to link to/comment on the same thing.

I've been striving mightily hard not to condemn CGL but do they just not CARE about the segment of the player base who is at the very least extremely put off by this entire thing? I wouldn't think Coleman would be at the very least swept under the carpet for a year or so.

On a lighter note, that is a pretty sweet troll (in the picture).
Last edited by Neurosis on Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Stahlseele
King
Posts: 5976
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:51 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post by Stahlseele »

The guy in the hat reminds me of a buddy of mine somehow O.o
Welcome, to IronHell.
Shrapnel wrote:
TFwiki wrote:Soon is the name of the region in the time-domain (familiar to all marketing departments, and to the moderators and staff of Fun Publications) which sees release of all BotCon news, club exclusives, and other fan desirables. Soon is when then will become now.

Peculiar properties of spacetime ensure that the perception of the magnitude of Soon is fluid and dependent, not on an individual's time-reference, but on spatial and cultural location. A marketer generally perceives Soon as a finite, known, yet unspeakable time-interval; to a fan, the interval appears greater, and may in fact approach the infinite, becoming Never. Once the interval has passed, however, a certain time-lensing effect seems to occur, and the time-interval becomes vanishingly small. We therefore see the strange result that the same fragment of spacetime may be observed, in quick succession, as Soon, Never, and All Too Quickly.
Zinegata
Prince
Posts: 4071
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:33 am

Post by Zinegata »

To be perfectly honest the Unicorn debates had pretty much been won and lost. There are just some insurgent hold outs :P.

Carry on with burning Coleman's effigy.
Endovior
Knight-Baron
Posts: 674
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Endovior »

I think the conclusion reached there was that, while there are certainly reasons that might come up in which Unicorns might be employed in a police capacity, the problems associated with their use, and the practicality of other easier methods, largely limit such use to ceremonial and specialty tasks. I could see a small mounted force being kept on hand to deal with mages or something, for example; given their anti-magical abilities... and if a given area needs that sort of magical security, perhaps they might do routine patrols in addition to conventional forces, as an obvious but more 'friendly' alternative to heavily armed and armored forces. After all, I'd imagine it's probably cheaper and easier to breed unicorns then it is to train and retain mages. Even so, I'd imagine that, as meta-creatures go, you'll see K9 units far more often; dogs (especially super-powered ones) are far more suited to your average police needs then horses are.
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Username17 »

Giving Loren Coleman "face presence" for SR is pretty weird. He never contributed anything worthwhile to the Shadowrun franchise. He was just a corporate suit. His only job was to cut paychecks to people who were actually making SR go, and he didn't do that job acceptably at any point.

They could have him facing for Battletech, because he did write a bunch of Battletech material. It's arguable if it was any good, but it did exist. Having him facing for SR is just them wagging their penis in our faces.

As for Unicorns, no one is suggesting that the cop on a unicorn is going to replace the cop in a car or the cop on foot or the cop on a bicycle or the cop on a motorcycle. All of those will continue to exist. But the cop on a unicorn is going to replace a cop on a horse, because it is better than a horse. It is smarter, tougher, and has magic fucking powers. Horse cops will continue to exist and continue to have a purpose for as far as the future is foreseeable at all. Unicorns and Griffins and shit represent a technological advancement in horses, something that hasn't happened in our own world in five hundred years. But it would be pretty weird if the cops didn't make use of it.

-Username17
Zinegata
Prince
Posts: 4071
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:33 am

Post by Zinegata »

Wow. Frank actually backtracked. Now if he'd actually apologize to knasser for calling him a retard when "Unicorn cops are at best a niche and highly anachronistic unit in the face of the modern world" was knasser's entire point all along.
Last edited by Zinegata on Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Wesley Street
Knight
Posts: 324
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 2:53 pm
Location: Indianapolis

Post by Wesley Street »

Props to the dude who made the full on troll outfit, complete with horns. That beats the lazy-ass "stick on some elf ears and don a leather jacket" approach of most SR costumers.
User avatar
Stahlseele
King
Posts: 5976
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 4:51 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Post by Stahlseele »

Well, maybe they want to show the people who is at fault . .
Give the blame a face.
Welcome, to IronHell.
Shrapnel wrote:
TFwiki wrote:Soon is the name of the region in the time-domain (familiar to all marketing departments, and to the moderators and staff of Fun Publications) which sees release of all BotCon news, club exclusives, and other fan desirables. Soon is when then will become now.

Peculiar properties of spacetime ensure that the perception of the magnitude of Soon is fluid and dependent, not on an individual's time-reference, but on spatial and cultural location. A marketer generally perceives Soon as a finite, known, yet unspeakable time-interval; to a fan, the interval appears greater, and may in fact approach the infinite, becoming Never. Once the interval has passed, however, a certain time-lensing effect seems to occur, and the time-interval becomes vanishingly small. We therefore see the strange result that the same fragment of spacetime may be observed, in quick succession, as Soon, Never, and All Too Quickly.
User avatar
Ancient History
Serious Badass
Posts: 12708
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm

Post by Ancient History »

Back on topic, the motion asking for the bond(s) was withdrawn by CGL.
Post Reply