There is a move he could make, but I'm not going to elucidate it because I'm trying to make it first.Midnight_v wrote:Mearls...
I don't think he has many correct moves he can make right now.
echo
Moderator: Moderators
There is a move he could make, but I'm not going to elucidate it because I'm trying to make it first.Midnight_v wrote:Mearls...
I don't think he has many correct moves he can make right now.
Dungeons and Dragons: Super Hyper Enhanced Championship Edition Alpha Diamond DX Plus Alpha FES HD – Premium Enhanced Game of the Year Collector’s Edition (without Avatars!): Cherry Red VersionKoumei wrote:EX Plus XX #Reload. On Ice.Josh_Kablack wrote: Dungeons and Dragons: Super Turbo Championship Edition Hyper Fighting Alpha
Koumei wrote:I'm just glad that Jill Stein stayed true to her homeopathic principles by trying to win with .2% of the vote. She just hasn't diluted it enough!
Koumei wrote:I am disappointed in Santorum: he should carry his dead election campaign to term!
Just a heads up... Your post is pregnant... When you miss that many periods it's just a given.
]I want him to tongue-punch my box.
The divine in me says the divine in you should go fuck itself.
Happiness is mandatory Citizen! Failure to be happy is insubordination and potential treason!Leress wrote:Dungeons and Dragons: Super Hyper Enhanced Championship Edition Alpha Diamond DX Plus Alpha FES HD – Premium Enhanced Game of the Year Collector’s Edition (without Avatars!): Cherry Red VersionKoumei wrote:EX Plus XX #Reload. On Ice.Josh_Kablack wrote: Dungeons and Dragons: Super Turbo Championship Edition Hyper Fighting Alpha
This is it exactly. 3E D&D took the "Advanced" off the title because 2nd edition had shat on itself with wheel spinning non-improvements like "Revised" and "Skills & Powers". Declaring the line to be the third edition of OD&D instead of the third edition of AD&D allowed them to signal to the populace that they were making a fresh start and looking back to previous editions and seeing where they had gone wrong. But it also did so in a way that was subtle and did not directly attack the previous edition.Psychic Robot wrote:4e is new coke. 5e had better be coke classic or else that line is done for
It's hard to follow. But apparently his answer to the twin problems of the level treadmill being disempowering to players and the evaluation of the power of different options and strategies being difficult is... to give people a bewilderingly complex power point tally based on all the crazy crap they can do and basing the level treadmill on that.malak wrote:Today's Legends & Lore is truly painful to read. And makes me sad.
http://www.wizards.com/DnD/Article.aspx ... l/20110726
It would be comforting to believe that, but I think he is serious. It fits the pattern of deepities that hallmark Mearls' style. Talk about generally acknowledged problem. Announce that you're "going to" fix it. Type some crap up really fast that is sufficiently complex that it won't be obvious to many people that you haven't fixed the problem. Walk the fuck away and do it again.Koumei wrote:Please tell me Mearls is just trolling us.
This fragment alone makes not a lot of sense. The reasoning in the post however is sound. AD&D3 does sound a lot better than 5e.hogarth wrote:This is the dumbest thing I've heard recently. Calling 4E "Third Edition, Mark 3" would not have made it more popular than it was.FrankTrollman wrote: Do not underestimate the power and pull of putting a giant number 3 on a D&D edition.
3E took the "Advanced" off of the title because AD&D had become, for all practical purposes D&D. There was no "advanced" in it; it had become the baseline for the game. Attempts at revising the original game had generally falled flat in the 2E era. (Remember 2E was really an attempt at removing Gygax's name from the product.) It made sense in Gygax's edition; it sort of made sense in David Cook's edition, but not in Monte Cook, Tweet and William's edition. (Just looking at the front pages for the three editions is fascinating, no wonder 3E sucked; just look at the committee, they can't even have a single person up on top. It takes up almost the entire page. On 2E it is like less than a 1/4 page in regular type. 1E had large type but only four names and they were just Gygax and the illustrators.)FrankTrollman wrote:This is it exactly. 3E D&D took the "Advanced" off the title because 2nd edition had shat on itself with wheel spinning non-improvements like "Revised" and "Skills & Powers".
I totally agree, but that's a discussion for a different thread. And I think that what's more important is to have rules transparency with Advanced D&D such that people can play alongside their younger siblings or if a 'buy and try' person really likes it they don't have to scrap the whole project to play the Advanced line.tzor wrote:Actually why not start with a real BASIC D&D, an easy to use box set; limited classes; limited levels; relatively cheep; something for the toys r us; suitable for children of all ages. Then have the "ADVANCED" D&D with all the bells and fancy rules.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
People are stupid. They won't buy "AD&D3" as it's not clear to them that it's the edition after 4e. D&D5 is the name to go.malak wrote:This fragment alone makes not a lot of sense. The reasoning in the post however is sound. AD&D3 does sound a lot better than 5e.hogarth wrote:This is the dumbest thing I've heard recently. Calling 4E "Third Edition, Mark 3" would not have made it more popular than it was.FrankTrollman wrote: Do not underestimate the power and pull of putting a giant number 3 on a D&D edition.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
Because more "basic" versions of D&D have never sold as well as more "advanced" versions of D&D, I imagine.tzor wrote: Actually why not start with a real BASIC D&D, an easy to use box set; limited classes; limited levels; relatively cheep; something for the toys r us; suitable for children of all ages.