Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Faction

Mundane & Pointless Stuff I Must Share: The Off Topic Forum

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
JonSetanta
King
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: interbutts

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by JonSetanta »

Oh.. Biden... right. :ugone2far:

Snowball, hell, etc.
The Adventurer's Almanac wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by Crissa »

Yes, pretty much all of the Democratic candidates have waffled but supported Civil Unions. Kucinich was the only one to openly say he was for it.

That was probably the least important bit of information on the chart - and on a candidate that pulled out like four weeks ago.

-Crissa
User avatar
JonSetanta
King
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: interbutts

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by JonSetanta »

So, the rest is accurate?
The Adventurer's Almanac wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by Username17 »

sigma999 at [unixtime wrote:1202254839[/unixtime]]So, the rest is accurate?


Well, McCain waffled on the torture issue.

-Username17
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by Crissa »

I wouldn't say it is complete, but the seven remaining candidates are fairly well covered.

McCain has the most errors, I think. He actively voted against the constitutional amendment against gay marriage, but voted for the federal law. He changed his position on Guantanamo to pro. He voted for wire tapping last week. And he's waffled on ANWR drilling.

The remaining Democratic candidates are Clinton, Obama, Gravel. Gravel isn't campaigning, I like him, but voting for him is kinda pointless. Obama is as middle of the road democrat you can get, and Clinton is the establishment candidate. Saying that, Clinton has done more to be different than the establishment than Obama (most diverse hiring, promoting, and only non-sexist candidacy), although Obama has been more liberal on some points like censorship and drug enforcement (that being that it should be less invasive).

I feel like I'm choosing otherwise identical candidates in the Democratic Primary. I can't remember candidates so alike x-x Same federal experience, similar upbringing, same social status, same DNC sponsorship, same social work... And I'm not going to vote on the difference between working for a large state employer while doing pro-bono political activism vs working as a political activist and then ending up in the state legislature. That's pretty similar, honestly. One can't really run for legislature when your spouse is an elected official, and one does need to work if your spouse is a state legislator (or aspiring).

Clinton is projected to win the most delegates today, but I'd guess that Obama actually will eek out a win. A Clinton clear win will mean she'll choose someone not like Obama as a running mate. A less clear win might mean a coalition candidacy. And Obama win... I dunno. Lotsa promises, not much to show for it at the Federal level yet.

-Crissa
Fwib
Knight-Baron
Posts: 755
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by Fwib »

As I understand it, legislation in the US is typically made up into great big composite motions full of stuff unrelated to the title of the text (like 'pork-barrel' spending, added to get votes for something) - so how does a legislator deal with the problem of people claiming they are for or against some subject, because it happened to be one of several things on a bill that they voted for/against?

Or have I misunderstood?
User avatar
Crissa
King
Posts: 6720
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Santa Cruz

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by Crissa »

That's why Senators historically don't get elected President, Fwib. Compromise makes for bad slogans.

-Crissa
Fwib
Knight-Baron
Posts: 755
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by Fwib »

I look forward to seeing if Arnie can get the law changed so he can run for president. That would be interesting.
User avatar
tzor
Prince
Posts: 4266
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by tzor »

Fwib at [unixtime wrote:1202404699[/unixtime]]I look forward to seeing if Arnie can get the law changed so he can run for president. That would be interesting.


With Romney now out of the race that leaves only Arnie's Candiate and Chuck Norris' Candidate in the running. Now a "debate" between Arnie and Chuck ... that would be "interesting."
User avatar
Cielingcat
Duke
Posts: 1453
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by Cielingcat »

I wanna see that so bad.
CHICKENS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO DO COCAINE, SILKY HEN
Josh_Kablack wrote:You are not a unique and precious snowflake, you are just one more fucking asshole on the internet who presumes themselves to be better than the unwashed masses.
cthulhu
Duke
Posts: 2162
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by cthulhu »

Has sly endorsed anyone? preferably a democrat?
Username17
Serious Badass
Posts: 29894
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by Username17 »

Stallone is a staunch Republican and endorsed McCain. Most "action stars" actually believe some of the crap about cleaning up towns with two fisted justice and lean heavily towards knee-jerk republicanism. For example Bruce Willis, while a fun actor to watch, is personally a drunken idiot who is against taxes and for police states as long as it doesn't interfere in his own ability to spend his piles of money and drink heavily.

But all is not lost on the ultimate showdown.

Hulk Hogan supports Obama.
50 Cent endorses Clinton.

-Username17
User avatar
CatharzGodfoot
King
Posts: 5668
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by CatharzGodfoot »

Hogan would be a great vice president.
The law in its majestic equality forbids the rich as well as the poor from stealing bread, begging and sleeping under bridges.
-Anatole France

Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.

-Josh Kablack

User avatar
the_taken
Knight-Baron
Posts: 830
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Lost in the Sea of Awesome

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by the_taken »

CatharzGodfoot at [unixtime wrote:1202526523[/unixtime]]Hogan would be a great vice president.


He also makes a great giant monster.
I had a signature here once but I've since lost it.

My current project: http://tgdmb.com/viewtopic.php?t=56456
User avatar
JonSetanta
King
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: interbutts

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by JonSetanta »

President: Obama
VP: Hogan

Team Kickass
The Adventurer's Almanac wrote:
Fri Oct 01, 2021 10:25 pm
Nobody gives a flying fuck about Tordek and Regdar.
User avatar
Josh_Kablack
King
Posts: 5318
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Online. duh

Re: Why only two-parties in the US? Electability trumps Fac

Post by Josh_Kablack »

sigma999 wrote:Oh.. Biden... right. :ugone2far:

Snowball, hell, etc.
I'm going with etc. here :p


Also, as per http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washing ... obama.html
In past years, Biden received $1,000 checks from Sylvester Stallone, Ellen Barkin, and West Wing producer Aaron Sorkin, and $2,000 from West Wing actor Bradley Whitford. Michael J. Fox gave him $2,000 back in 2001. Cher gave him $2,100 in 2006.
Last edited by Josh_Kablack on Sun Aug 24, 2008 4:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply