infected slut princess wrote:Kaelik, the evidence is abundant. We know that in your thousands and thousands of internet forum posts, you have expressed preferences. Among those preferences is having men with badges and guns take things from people so that you can have something you want, and if they resist, you think it is justified for the men with badges and guns to kill them. Examples abound. You celebrate the state's violence because your philosophy depends on it.
So you still don't have any evidence besides lying? Because again, that's both, A) not evidence of me saying anything, B) not evidence of me supporting you know, the thing I specifically fucking said I didn't support!
infected slut princess wrote:Ok, instead of "murdering people" and the trappings of a legal definition, just think "killing people without moral justification."
You know what else you could do besides saying dumb things? READ THE REST OF THE FUCKING POST! YOU KNOW, THE PART WHERE I SAID THAT I DISAGREE WITH DRONE KILLINGS! YOU COULD READ THAT, AND THEN ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG!
infected slut princess wrote:Killing people without moral justification is generally the worst thing you can do. Is it not the case that Genghis Bush, Obomba, and Trump have all done this? If so, then why doesn't Obama get a funny nickname like Dumb Terrible Guy and Extra Dumb Terrible Retard Guy? Is it because you are a fucking piece of shit who makes excuses when "your team" does something terrible, but not when "their team" does something terrible?
You have two options:
1) Hate all presidents that kill people without moral justification.
You personally, and literally every human being in the world, has killed people without moral justification. (okay maybe not some kids)
If your system involves claiming that Hitler is just as bad as a guy who doesn't donate all his money to charity because he's trying to save up for retirement, then your system is fucking shit.
If your moral system accepts that there are levels of bad, then the fact that Obama saved more lives than he killed should be relevant in judging him, while not specifically absolving him of criticism for large numbers of drone attacks that almost certainly shouldn't have happened, is still relevant as compared to how he should be judged relative to your average Nixon/Reagan/Bush mass murderers.