Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
For Valor
Knight-Baron
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:31 pm

Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by For Valor »

Product of Infernal Dalliance has always bothered me...

Honestly, the tiefling is supposed to be the one with the "Satan came and raped your great great grandma", and it comes with stat boosts and darkness 1/day. And that's for, like, a human. I always thoght that elven tielfings and human tieflings should be different. Honestly, if everyone EXCEPT your great great grandfather was an elf, you'd probably look a little different compared to the average tielfing-human combination.

And then, the tielfing is VERY different compared to a human with Product of Infernal Dalliance, and yet they have the same/a similar background. What's up with that?

So I think the solution is a template.

Product of Fiendish Dalliance [Racial Template]
Cost:You lose all the attributes of your normal race (aside from benefits related to skills?), including things like low-light vision
Benefit: gain one of the [baatezu], [tanar'ri], [yugoloth], or [demodand] subtypes, with all the benefits. You also gain 2 claw attacks (1d4 for medium chars) or 1 bite attack (1d6, medium chars). You also radiate faint evil and can take any [Fiend] feat, if you're into that sort of thing.

how is that?
Mask wrote:And for the love of all that is good and unholy, just get a fucking hippogrif mount and pretend its a flying worg.
Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Post by Mask_De_H »

Huh?

Tieflings are the "mommy fucked a marilith" race, PoID is the "and I'm 1/16 Cherokee...I mean Tanar'ri" feat. At least, that's how I always saw it.
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
User avatar
Orion
Prince
Posts: 3756
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Orion »

But Tiefling's aren't half-demons, half-fiends are half-demons. Tiefligns ar explicitly supposed to be 1/16th.

I *think* the Op's complaint is that PoID, which is a feat, actually gives more dramatic fiendish traits than being a Tiefling, which is a race, does. Which is true, but if you just cross out "bonus feat" from human and write in the text of PoID you could call the new race "fiendborn" and call it a day.
Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Post by Mask_De_H »

True. The RoW writeup for Tiefling and the ToF writeup for PoID are pretty similar, so I don't even know anymore.

Tieflings get the Outsider subtype, whereas PoID gets a specific fiendish subtype; so you could say they are "great grandmammy got fucked by a bearded devil" group as opposed to the Tiefling's "my great granddaddy was Rance and I was borne of a Succubus" or something.

PoID gives you specific fiendish things, while Tiefling gives you magical fiendish things. I guess that's the mechanical split, although you could take Tiefling and PoID and be a double fiend.
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
K
King
Posts: 6487
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by K »

Orion wrote: Tiefligns ar explicitly supposed to be 1/16th.
Under what ruleset? What book? It's not that I don't believe you, I just don't remember it ever being defined that exactly.
Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Post by Mask_De_H »

K wrote:
Orion wrote: Tiefligns ar explicitly supposed to be 1/16th.
Under what ruleset? What book? It's not that I don't believe you, I just don't remember it ever being defined that exactly.
That might have been a play on my "I'm 1/16th Cherokee...I mean Tanar'ri" line. I don't think that's actually in a book anywhere.
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
K
King
Posts: 6487
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by K »

For Valor wrote:Product of Infernal Dalliance has always bothered me...

Honestly, the tiefling is supposed to be the one with the "Satan came and raped your great great grandma", and it comes with stat boosts and darkness 1/day. And that's for, like, a human. I always thoght that elven tielfings and human tieflings should be different.
The reason I went with a feat is because thematically the coverage on bad-touched races is pretty thin already, and it's nonsensical to make demon and devil monster template variations on standard races.

Also, the things we handed out are better than starting player race stuff, so even if you traded out your race stuff you end up more powerful. It's about as powerful as a feat and opens up the powerful Fiend feats, while starting race crap is about half a feat.

Also note that PoID is available to anyone, so it's the entry fee for random-ass crap to be assimilated into the ToF style fiends. So say you wanted to make a Medusa Fiend, this would be the way.

Personally, I've always thought the half-fiend/fiendish/tiefling scale was just lazy game design and doesn't make a lot of sense. I prefer the system I wrote where you just take levels of one of the fiendish classes and it scales to your power level. I'd honestly just pretend that the standard bad-touched stuff doesn't exist and just use Tome Fiends.
Last edited by K on Mon Jul 19, 2010 9:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Orion
Prince
Posts: 3756
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Orion »

I meant, tieflings are explicitly supposed to be distantly fiendish, not exactly 1/16
magnuskn
Knight
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 7:01 am

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by magnuskn »

For Valor wrote:I always thoght that elven tielfings and human tieflings should be different.
There are already some tiefling variants. Tanarukks, for example.

http://forgottenrealms.wikia.com/wiki/Tanarukk
User avatar
Prak
Serious Badass
Posts: 17345
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Prak »

Fey'ri too
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.

You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
Red_Rob
Prince
Posts: 2594
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:07 pm

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by Red_Rob »

K wrote:Also, the things we handed out are better than starting player race stuff, so even if you traded out your race stuff you end up more powerful. It's about as powerful as a feat and opens up the powerful Fiend feats, while starting race crap is about half a feat.
Humans explicitly get exactly a feat as their starting race crap. If the races are at all balanced then really all race options should be worth about a feat.
Simplified Tome Armor.

Tome item system and expanded Wish Economy rules.

Try our fantasy card game Clash of Nations! Available via Print on Demand.

“Those Who Can Make You Believe Absurdities, Can Make You Commit Atrocities” - Voltaire
User avatar
For Valor
Knight-Baron
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:31 pm

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by For Valor »

Red_Rob wrote:
K wrote:Also, the things we handed out are better than starting player race stuff, so even if you traded out your race stuff you end up more powerful. It's about as powerful as a feat and opens up the powerful Fiend feats, while starting race crap is about half a feat.
Humans explicitly get exactly a feat as their starting race crap. If the races are at all balanced then really all race options should be worth about a feat.
This is what I was thinking.

I believe that instead of adapting to the race system and configuring race abilities and feats as separate features, the race system needs a rehash so that other races match to the human and Elf Variant.

Slightly unrelated
I DM'd a session where everyone was a "human", but their bonus feat at the beginning had to be something like a [Fiend] or [Monstrous] feat that defined them. Someone took the extra reach feat from Savage Species and had stretchy arms, while somebody else grabbed breath weapon from ToF.
Mask wrote:And for the love of all that is good and unholy, just get a fucking hippogrif mount and pretend its a flying worg.
User avatar
Prak
Serious Badass
Posts: 17345
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Prak »

The man has a point... A feat plus +1 skill point/level (before multiplying)
Cuz apparently I gotta break this down for you dense motherfuckers- I'm trans feminine nonbinary. My pronouns are they/them.
Winnah wrote:No, No. 'Prak' is actually a Thri Kreen impersonating a human and roleplaying himself as a D&D character. All hail our hidden insect overlords.
FrankTrollman wrote:In Soviet Russia, cosmic horror is the default state.

You should gain sanity for finding out that the problems of a region are because there are fucking monsters there.
K
King
Posts: 6487
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by K »

Red_Rob wrote:
K wrote:Also, the things we handed out are better than starting player race stuff, so even if you traded out your race stuff you end up more powerful. It's about as powerful as a feat and opens up the powerful Fiend feats, while starting race crap is about half a feat.
Humans explicitly get exactly a feat as their starting race crap. If the races are at all balanced then really all race options should be worth about a feat.
That's assuming that all races are created equal.... which they aren't. It's pretty generous to call Half-orc's and half-elfs starting package as even half a feat, and some alternate CR +0 races are made of pure awesome (deep halflings spring to mind).
User avatar
For Valor
Knight-Baron
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:31 pm

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by For Valor »

K wrote: That's assuming that all races are created equal.... which they aren't. It's pretty generous to call Half-orc's and half-elfs starting package as even half a feat, and some alternate CR +0 races are made of pure awesome (deep halflings spring to mind).
'kay...
For Valor wrote: ...the race system needs a rehash so that other races match to the human and Elf Variant.
hm.
Mask wrote:And for the love of all that is good and unholy, just get a fucking hippogrif mount and pretend its a flying worg.
User avatar
CatharzGodfoot
King
Posts: 5668
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by CatharzGodfoot »

K wrote:That's assuming that all races are created equal.... which they aren't. It's pretty generous to call Half-orc's and half-elfs starting package as even half a feat, and some alternate CR +0 races are made of pure awesome (deep halflings spring to mind).
You know, PoID really brings to mind a 'Product of Elvish Dalliance' feat which grants the elf subtype and every ability on an elf's racial abilities list. That would make for a decent half-elf, right?
The law in its majestic equality forbids the rich as well as the poor from stealing bread, begging and sleeping under bridges.
-Anatole France

Mount Flamethrower on rear
Drive in reverse
Win Game.

-Josh Kablack

Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by Mask_De_H »

For Valor wrote:
K wrote: That's assuming that all races are created equal.... which they aren't. It's pretty generous to call Half-orc's and half-elfs starting package as even half a feat, and some alternate CR +0 races are made of pure awesome (deep halflings spring to mind).
'kay...
For Valor wrote: ...the race system needs a rehash so that other races match to the human and Elf Variant.
hm.
Yes, and?
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
User avatar
For Valor
Knight-Baron
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:31 pm

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by For Valor »

Mask_De_H wrote:
For Valor wrote:
K wrote: That's assuming that all races are created equal.... which they aren't. It's pretty generous to call Half-orc's and half-elfs starting package as even half a feat, and some alternate CR +0 races are made of pure awesome (deep halflings spring to mind).
'kay...
For Valor wrote: ...the race system needs a rehash so that other races match to the human and Elf Variant.
hm.
Yes, and?
I call it avoiding a topic of discussion. You call it what you want.

How about yourself? Do you think re-doing races is a good idea?
Mask wrote:And for the love of all that is good and unholy, just get a fucking hippogrif mount and pretend its a flying worg.
K
King
Posts: 6487
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by K »

For Valor wrote:
I call it avoiding a topic of discussion. You call it what you want.

How about yourself? Do you think re-doing races is a good idea?
I reserve the right to not comment on thread-jacks, or things I find obvious or boring.
Mask_De_H
Duke
Posts: 1995
Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2009 7:17 pm

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by Mask_De_H »

For Valor wrote:
Mask_De_H wrote: Yes, and?
I call it avoiding a topic of discussion. You call it what you want.

How about yourself? Do you think re-doing races is a good idea?
It required a redo when Races of War was made, and I don't see the need to redo everything to the Elf Variant's standard. Also, the tricky thing about saying we should balance things to about a feat is the fact that there are a lot of feats.

PoID is a feat. Soul Eater is a feat. Large Size is a feat. Skill Focus (underwater basket weaving) is a feat. Assume Supernatural Ability is a feat. Which set of feats do we balance to?
FrankTrollman wrote: Halfling women, as I'm sure you are aware, combine all the "fun" parts of pedophilia without any of the disturbing, illegal, or immoral parts.
K wrote:That being said, the usefulness of airships for society is still transporting cargo because it's an option that doesn't require a powerful wizard to show up for work on time instead of blowing the day in his harem of extraplanar sex demons/angels.
Chamomile wrote: See, it's because K's belief in leaving generation of individual monsters to GMs makes him Chaotic, whereas Frank's belief in the easier usability of monsters pre-generated by game designers makes him Lawful, and clearly these philosophies are so irreconcilable as to be best represented as fundamentally opposed metaphysical forces.
Whipstitch wrote:You're on a mad quest, dude. I'd sooner bet on Zeus getting bored and letting Sisyphus put down the fucking rock.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 14803
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: Product of Infernal Dalliance Is Not a Feat

Post by Kaelik »

Mask_De_H wrote:Soul Eater is a feat.
Technically, Soul Eater is two feats.

We just combine them into one, because as feats, they are like at absolute best half as good as Greater Teleport/PoID/and combat feat/Wings of Evil/ect.
DSMatticus wrote:Kaelik gonna kaelik. Whatcha gonna do?
The U.S. isn't a democracy and if you think it is, you are a rube.

That's libertarians for you - anarchists who want police protection from their slaves.
Post Reply