Polymorph

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

RobG
Apprentice
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:42 am
Location: NoVA

Polymorph

Post by RobG »

Im writing up my final rules for 3.5 and I cant put it off any longer. Ive hit Polymorph.

Ive seen much eye-rolling and shrugging at the mention of the spell but what are the actual, honest-to-god problems with Polymorph?

Not looking for solutions yet, just problems. Need to know what to fix first.
User avatar
shadzar
Prince
Posts: 4922
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:08 pm

Post by shadzar »

Polymorph other, i think is the problem. oh BBEG you are going to do this or that etc.. well lets see you try when you are a fluffy bunny.
Play the game, not the rules.
Swordslinger wrote:Or fuck it... I'm just going to get weapon specialization in my cock and whip people to death with it. Given all the enemies are total pussies, it seems like the appropriate thing to do.
Lewis Black wrote:If the people of New Zealand want to be part of our world, I believe they should hop off their islands, and push 'em closer.
good read (Note to self Maxus sucks a barrel of cocks.)
Grek
Prince
Posts: 3114
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:37 pm

Post by Grek »

1. By being able to turn into a Troll, Elephant or Giant Scorpion, the caster of Polymorph can spend a single spell slot to become a better fighter than anything the actual fighter class gives you.
2. Turning into a Choker or a Ravid or something gives you monster powers that were never balanced for or even considered as player character powers.
3. The rules for how Polymorph works, what it changes and what it doesn't are a badly written and confusing tangle of references to other spells. While this doesn't actually break anything in and of itself, it is a pain in the ass to figure out at the table.
Chamomile wrote:Grek is a national treasure.
Sashi
Knight-Baron
Posts: 723
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 6:52 pm

Post by Sashi »

shadzar wrote:Polymorph other, i think is the problem. oh BBEG you are going to do this or that etc.. well lets see you try when you are a fluffy bunny.
Up until this point I have just glazed over your bullshit. But this is so absolutely anti-insightful that I have no choice but to block you.
User avatar
Foxwarrior
Duke
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:54 am
Location: RPG City, USA

Post by Foxwarrior »

Well, it's at least amusing that he managed to pick the least problematic Polymorph spell.
Fuchs
Duke
Posts: 2446
Joined: Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Zürich

Post by Fuchs »

Polymorph other is as problematic as polymorph self if used on the party by the party wizard.
RobG
Apprentice
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:42 am
Location: NoVA

Post by RobG »

Grek wrote:1. By being able to turn into a Troll, Elephant or Giant Scorpion, the caster of Polymorph can spend a single spell slot to become a better fighter than anything the actual fighter class gives you.
Im not seeing it. I have the 7th level fighter dealing more damage than the Troll. I have the 10th/11th level fighter dealing more than the Elephant or Giant Scorpion. I see the +26 grapple on the Elephant but I also see a low AC and no Improved Grab. The trample is kind of nice. I see Improved Grab on the Scorpion with a +21 but a 10th level figher with Imp Grapple has a +20. The attack bonus on the sting is really bad and the save DC isnt great.
Last edited by RobG on Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
RobG
Apprentice
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 6:42 am
Location: NoVA

Post by RobG »

Grek wrote: 2. Turning into a Choker or a Ravid or something gives you monster powers that were never balanced for or even considered as player character powers.
3. The rules for how Polymorph works, what it changes and what it doesn't are a badly written and confusing tangle of references to other spells. While this doesn't actually break anything in and of itself, it is a pain in the ass to figure out at the table.
The Choker doesnt have the extra action in 3.5 and the Ravid is an Outsider. The fly ability is Su too and without it you're basically slowed.

Agreed on the spell writing. The cross referencing is confusing.

Also, thank you for actually responding to the topic.
...You Lost Me
Duke
Posts: 1854
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:21 am

Post by ...You Lost Me »

How about a giant scorpion against a level 7 fighter? You can pump your caster level by 3 easy, getting you the 10 HD necessary to polymorph to a giant scorpion. Same process applies to any creature--take its HD and drop that by 2-4, and you have the level of the caster using the spell (and thus the level of the fighter that the caster is currently outclassing).
DSMatticus wrote:Again, look at this fucking map you moron. Take your finger and trace each country's coast, then trace its claim line. Even you - and I say that as someone who could not think less of your intelligence - should be able to tell that one of these things is not like the other.
Kaelik wrote:I invented saying mean things about Tussock.
User avatar
Cynic
Prince
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Cynic »

shadzar wrote:Polymorph other, i think is the problem. oh BBEG you are going to do this or that etc.. well lets see you try when you are a fluffy bunny.

Aside from this being one of the lesser evils (neither the best nor the worst) of the polymorph problems, I think the changed name was actually baleful polymorph.

One of my other nitpicky problems with polymorph object is that one of the criteria for duration is "Same kingdom (animal, vegetable, mineral)" and/or "Same class (mammals, fungi, metals, etc.)" Neither of these actually have true definitions in D&D. I see something in the gnome class that mentions something about small burrowing mammals

"burrowing mammal (a badger, fox, rabbit, or the like, see below)"

Also how does mammal, fungi, metal classify as class. So, iron is in the same distinction as Fighter? I mean, sure, they both are ineffective without magical help but seriously.


---

I can't remember what spell it was that Virgil used in the Tamarask or... game in which he polymorphed something into a gigantic trap of some kind against a monster. But, that kind of bullshit is also one of the polymorph problems.


In reference to the Choker, what abilities did it have in 3.0 that it doesn't have in 3.5. the SRD shows that it still has

"Quickness (Su)
Although not particularly dexterous, a choker is supernaturally quick. It can take an extra standard action or move action during its turn each round."


---
Last edited by Cynic on Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ancient History wrote:We were working on Street Magic, and Frank asked me if a houngan had run over my dog.
koz
Duke
Posts: 1585
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:39 pm
Location: Oz

Post by koz »

Everything I learned about DnD, I learned from Frank Trollman.
Kaelik wrote:You are so full of Strawmen that I can only assume you actually shit actual straw.
souran wrote:...uber, nerd-rage-inducing, minutia-devoted, pointless blithering shit.
Schwarzkopf wrote:The Den, your one-stop shop for in-depth analysis of Dungeons & Dragons and distressingly credible threats of oral rape.
DSM wrote:Apparently, The GM's Going To Punch You in Your Goddamned Face edition of D&D is getting more traction than I expected. Well, it beats playing 4th. Probably 5th, too.
Frank Trollman wrote:Giving someone a mouth full of cock is a standard action.
PoliteNewb wrote:If size means anything, it's what position you have to get in to give a BJ.
Image
User avatar
hogarth
Prince
Posts: 4582
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by hogarth »

Fuchs wrote:Polymorph other is as problematic as polymorph self if used on the party by the party wizard.
If by "polymorph other", you mean "polymorph any object", maybe.
RobG wrote:What are the actual, honest-to-god problems with Polymorph?
The basic problem is a dilemma.

If you don't give the caster any of the powers of the creature he polymorphs into (e.g. it's just a glorified Disguise Self), then it's a lame spell and it doesn't match how shapechanging works in fantasy fiction.

If you do give the caster some of the powers of the creature he polymorphs into, then it turns into dumpster-diving through the Monster Manual looking for combos that are broken when applied to a spellcaster (even if the underlying monster isn't particularly broken).
User avatar
virgil
King
Posts: 6339
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by virgil »

Cynic wrote:I can't remember what spell it was that Virgil used in the Tamarask or... game in which he polymorphed something into a gigantic trap of some kind against a monster. But, that kind of bullshit is also one of the polymorph problems.
That was polymorph any object, in which I polymorphed a spare nonmagical dagger into a 150' tall Meso-American style pyramid, with the apex immediately beneath the monster we were fighting, and a legally made auto-reset touch attack trap (location sensitive); so a +20 touch attack for 20d6. The silliness from that was the fact the pyramid was permanent because it was made of the same intelligence (none), kingdom (mineral), and class (metal) as the dagger.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
Grek
Prince
Posts: 3114
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:37 pm

Post by Grek »

Yeah, with Polymorph, you want to buff your caster level even more so than you want to normally as a spellcaster. But even without any buffing at all, you can turn into an N-headed hydra, where N is your caster level.
Chamomile wrote:Grek is a national treasure.
Aharon
Master
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:55 am

Post by Aharon »

...You Lost Me wrote:How about a giant scorpion against a level 7 fighter? You can pump your caster level by 3 easy, getting you the 10 HD necessary to polymorph to a giant scorpion. Same process applies to any creature--take its HD and drop that by 2-4, and you have the level of the caster using the spell (and thus the level of the fighter that the caster is currently outclassing).
Polymorph is turn into thing with min(your CL or target's HD). Boosting CL isn't useful here. It's still a strong spell, of course.
TheFlatline
Prince
Posts: 2606
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:43 pm

Post by TheFlatline »

Seems like the easiest solution to Polymorph object at least is to nerf it to where you have conservation of mass.
User avatar
virgil
King
Posts: 6339
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by virgil »

TheFlatline wrote:Seems like the easiest solution to Polymorph object at least is to nerf it to where you have conservation of mass.
At the level I used it (17th), I'm fine with that particular use. It was actually a move on par with the fighters of the group at the time in combat.

Read the Tomes' material on the polymorph spells, they're fascinating and relevant to this discussion.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
ishy
Duke
Posts: 2404
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 2:59 pm

Post by ishy »

virgil wrote:
TheFlatline wrote:Seems like the easiest solution to Polymorph object at least is to nerf it to where you have conservation of mass.
At the level I used it (17th), I'm fine with that particular use. It was actually a move on par with the fighters of the group at the time in combat.

Read the Tomes' material on the polymorph spells, they're fascinating and relevant to this discussion.
Seeing as polymorph any object's range is 25 ft + 5 * ½ lvl, you can't create an at least 150 ft tall object at caster level 17.
Gary Gygax wrote:The player’s path to role-playing mastery begins with a thorough understanding of the rules of the game
Bigode wrote:I wouldn't normally make that blanket of a suggestion, but you seem to deserve it: scroll through the entire forum, read anything that looks interesting in term of design experience, then come back.
User avatar
shadzar
Prince
Posts: 4922
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 6:08 pm

Post by shadzar »

Cynic wrote:
shadzar wrote:Polymorph other, i think is the problem. oh BBEG you are going to do this or that etc.. well lets see you try when you are a fluffy bunny.

Aside from this being one of the lesser evils (neither the best nor the worst) of the polymorph problems, I think the changed name was actually baleful polymorph.
yeah it is.
Play the game, not the rules.
Swordslinger wrote:Or fuck it... I'm just going to get weapon specialization in my cock and whip people to death with it. Given all the enemies are total pussies, it seems like the appropriate thing to do.
Lewis Black wrote:If the people of New Zealand want to be part of our world, I believe they should hop off their islands, and push 'em closer.
good read (Note to self Maxus sucks a barrel of cocks.)
Ektagliaresia
NPC
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 11:23 pm

Post by Ektagliaresia »

Aharon wrote:
...You Lost Me wrote:How about a giant scorpion against a level 7 fighter? You can pump your caster level by 3 easy, getting you the 10 HD necessary to polymorph to a giant scorpion. Same process applies to any creature--take its HD and drop that by 2-4, and you have the level of the caster using the spell (and thus the level of the fighter that the caster is currently outclassing).
Polymorph is turn into thing with min(your CL or target's HD). Boosting CL isn't useful here. It's still a strong spell, of course.
Even if it was, this would be more of a problem with "easy CL increase" rather than Polymorph.
User avatar
JonSetanta
King
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: interbutts

Post by JonSetanta »

I'm sorry to say this but... use the Pathfinder version.
User avatar
hogarth
Prince
Posts: 4582
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 1:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by hogarth »

sigma999 wrote:I'm sorry to say this but... use the Pathfinder version.
I think there is quite a bit of merit in how Pathfinder handled polymorph spells. They have a decent mixture of granting monster abilities but not granting too many monster abilities.

But...
(1) there are still people who don't like that Wimpy J. Wizard turns into a wimpy elephant instead of an average elephant.

(2) even though the list of monster abilities you can grab is limited (a good thing, IMO), you still end up dumpster-diving for monsters that have a bunch of attacks and abilities.
User avatar
virgil
King
Posts: 6339
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by virgil »

ishy wrote:
virgil wrote:Seeing as polymorph any object's range is 25 ft + 5 * ½ lvl, you can't create an at least 150 ft tall object at caster level 17.
This is not an area spell. If that kind of stupid interpretation did exist, then your summoned badger would disappear if it double-moved and contact other plane couldn't work.

I found PF's polymorph fix to be a fun mix of Tome Fix Version 2 and 3.X's dumpster diving flaw; the fact you gain the monster's natural attacks & movement type and however many special abilities you can match with the spell's list...
Last edited by virgil on Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
User avatar
PoliteNewb
Duke
Posts: 1053
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:23 am
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Post by PoliteNewb »

hogarth wrote: The basic problem is a dilemma.

If you don't give the caster any of the powers of the creature he polymorphs into (e.g. it's just a glorified Disguise Self), then it's a lame spell and it doesn't match how shapechanging works in fantasy fiction.

If you do give the caster some of the powers of the creature he polymorphs into, then it turns into dumpster-diving through the Monster Manual looking for combos that are broken when applied to a spellcaster (even if the underlying monster isn't particularly broken).
I think we need to do the latter, but I don't believe that automatically breaks it. I think the problem is getting all/most of the powers of the monster and still retaining your awesome wizard powers (plus magic items, feats, whatever).

Turning your fighter into an average troll isn't necessarily a big deal; turning your fighter into a troll with fighter feats and 7th level fighter magic items is a bigger deal.

The other issue, IMO, is durations. Being a troll for a little while might mean you rock, for a little while. As long as people aren't staying Firbolgs or spellcasting Dire Bears 24/7, it's less of a problem.
Last edited by PoliteNewb on Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I am judging the philosophies and decisions you have presented in this thread. The ones I have seen look bad, and also appear to be the fruit of a poisonous tree that has produced only madness and will continue to produce only madness.

--AngelFromAnotherPin

believe in one hand and shit in the other and see which ones fills up quicker. it will be the one you are full of, shit.

--Shadzar
User avatar
Neurosis
Duke
Posts: 1057
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 3:28 pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?

Post by Neurosis »

You know what my big problem with polymorph is?

Choosing the best creature to turn into and figuring out which stats do and do not change and how takes FOR GOD DAMN EVER at the table. It brings the game to a grinding halt if the caster doesn't have "his" stats at every creature he could possibly polymorph into statted out ahead of time.

You know what I don't get? Why does Polymorph have to be so fucking complicated?

Why can't it JUST turn you into the creature for a little while. You lose ALL of your spellcasting powers and magic items. You get ALL of its abilities (or if that's too broken, all of its extraordinary abilities) and all of its stats and its hit dice and so on for the duration.
Last edited by Neurosis on Thu Mar 15, 2012 7:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
For a minute, I used to be "a guy" in the TTRPG "industry". Now I'm just a nobody. For the most part, it's a relief.
Trank Frollman wrote:One of the reasons we can say insightful things about stuff is that we don't have to pretend to be nice to people. By embracing active aggression, we eliminate much of the passive aggression that so paralyzes things on other gaming forums.
hogarth wrote:As the good book saith, let he who is without boners cast the first stone.
TiaC wrote:I'm not quite sure why this is an argument. (Except that Kaelik is in it, that's a good reason.)
Post Reply