I can't change your mind, only you can do that, but you are incorrect again. "personal relationship with" and "personal relationship to" are slightly different, but in a way that most people don't draw a distinction between and they are used interchangeably for good reason. "With" is a more general request for information, if you asked a fan of the MCU what their personal relationship with the MCU was you might get a response like "I saw Iron Man back in 2008 and then watched every movie since then! I love Marvel movies and always watch them as soon as I can." "To" is asking what the state of your relationship is from that your point of view, so asking someone what their personal relationship to the MCU the expected response would be "I am a fan of the MCU," but you could also get the same exact response as if you had asked using "with" instead because that still tells you what their relationship to the MCU is (just not explicitly).Omegonthesane wrote: ↑Fri Oct 06, 2023 7:47 amto be clear: "personal relationship with X" has exactly one meaning in actual use, people might at most say "personal relationship to X" using personal as a synonym for individual, you can't change my mind, I'm not interested in this discussion except insofar as it facilitated a "when did you stop beating your wife?" style allegation framed as a legitimate inquiry.
On the ADA stuff, it looks to me like the person who brought the suits against the hotels dropped them after some stuff happened with one of their lawyers and the court is running with this case anyways just to kill the ADA. I didn't know you could do that, but I guess the SCOTUS gets to do whatever the fuck it wants.