The Gaming Den

Poor Majjy. "Lost" her hubby, and has to clean up that mess.

1104362101[/unixtime]] The operation is "If X, then Y; if P, then Q". [br][br][br]Umm, I have to ask again: "have you ever programmed before?"[br][br]That's not one conditional, or one operation. That's two. If you programmed it, then it could only be two seperate lines of code....

I had reported one post from that thread earlier today where somebody ripped into Lago with all sorts of personal attacks. The nicest thing he said about Lago was to call him a retard.[br][br]One post isn't grounds for deleting a thread though. Very curious. Lago - perhaps you ought to drop Autumn a...

Guest (Unregistered) at [unixtime wrote:1102959262[/unixtime]]On the upshot, WizOAutumn seems to have been so traumatized that some other WizO appears to have taken the lead on the board.

I don't think so - Wizo_BigSister (the other name at the top) was listed there at least since last month's contest.

The answer about the Pixie keeping it's racial hit die when it gains a character level is nice - oh, and it's also wrong by the rules explicitly.[br][br] How many Hit Dice does my 1st-level pixie rogue have? What would his effective character level be? [br]Unless noted otherwise, all creatures (othe...

1102284494[/unixtime]]Does anyone know if the Summon Undead spells have had errata yet to fix them? Or for that matter, a word from the author(s) giving us an unofficial fix to the spell's mechanics. As stated above, these spells are totally unuseable in their current form. Ick. [br][br]I haven't s...

Thanks for sharing. I need to go re-read Unapproachable East.

1086327294[/unixtime]]Sign me up with the Count here.[br][br]I don't think that Frank's reading is the one that the designers intended. However I do think that Frank's reading is the only one fully supported by current rules text. [br][br]What Bunny Boy said about sums it up for me... [br][br]edit:...

1102112169[/unixtime]]Did I never tell you guys about "Hungry Jack"? He was a human rogue, who took his 10th level bonus feat as "Gape of the Serpent" - which is totally legal because he can take any feat he wants and doesn't have to meet prereqs as it is a bonus feat. [br][br]C...

1102106769[/unixtime]]The designation of "Monstrous" is poorly applied anyhow - I point out that Gape of the Serpent (prerequisite: Swallow Whole) is also General. When was the last time your human sorcerer had Swallow Whole, and what sense would it make for him to swallow a gnome? [br][b...

Ess wrote:a multiheaded winged gelatinous feral yuan-ti pureblooded lawn gnome ghost

My head is spinning....

1102100001[/unixtime]]Alternately, you can also go the Cleric/Nar Demonbinder Mystic Theurge route -- then add 6 levels of Dweomerkeeper on the tail end. That way you get 9th level Cleric spells (19 caster levels), 8th level NarD spells (26 caster levels or 30 with Practiced Spellcaster feat), and ...

Thankfully I never mentioned belligerent, erratic or foul tempered.

Count_Arioch_the_28th at [unixtime wrote:1101902270[/unixtime]]Of course, that's the advantage of having the reputation as a belligerent, erratic, foul tempered idiot. I technically can't do much to make my rep any worse.

I don't think you're an idiot.

That's very true - you can take steps to make your new account (or your MuP) look like it doesn't belong to your "main" account. So let me rephrase what I said...[br][br]When you receive a warning, that warning now applies to all accounts that share that e-mail address.[br][br]Further, con...

I don't see how the two points conflict. I said when you receive a warning, it counts against all your existing screen names - not just the one that earned the warning. Autumn is saying that you (as the "owner" of a banned screen name) are free to create a new account. [br][br]Members who ...

1101882368[/unixtime]]So essentially, if your viewpoint is not popular with a certain segment of the WotC board, then you will get warnings about it, and eventually be banned. But don't worry, if you are willing to switch screen names, they are totally OK with you coming back again and again. So yo...

I disagree, Frank. When you make a post to a message board, you are granting everybody in the world who has internet access permission to read that post. When you send somebody an e-mail, you are granting access to the recipients.[br][br]You have your opinion, I have mine. I needed to make mine know...

My opinion probably doesn't mean much, but here it is anyway...

I think it's a pretty shitty thing to take a private conversation you had with somebody and post it on a public message board for others to point fingers at and ridicule.

*shrug* Take it or leave it, that's how I feel.

Alright - the regen X/Crit was what I expected. Just wanted to make sure. Thanks.

Frank wrote:Regeneration: 5/Critical Hits

I've never seen this sort of notation before, and I'm not coming up with a good guess what you mean by t. Would you mind explaining, for the dumbasses of the board, like me?

Lago_AM3P at [unixtime wrote:1101421736[/unixtime]]
(People who were on Nifty threads will know what I'm talking about.)

Only if they're not oblivious - like me, for instance.

Defining a default day as 24 hours is, in my opinion, OK - as long as there's wiggle room for DM's to do it differently in their world if they choose to.[br][br]I think a better definition of how "1/Day" items (and by extension abilities) works is to have them literally usable once per day...

It might be old, but this is the first I've seen two and two put together, to be honest.

LINKY [br][br]This is a new one to me. To summarize, basically the argument is that the wording of Magic Circle Against Evil actually severs a cleric's connection with undead he controls in the area.[br][br]Comments? The logic seems pretty good to me (though, of course, there are the usual WotC twi...