Search found 11 matches
- Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:31 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Major Design Choices of 4e D&D
- Replies: 198
- Views: 34495
- Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:07 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Major Design Choices of 4e D&D
- Replies: 198
- Views: 34495
- Sun Aug 09, 2009 7:49 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Major Design Choices of 4e D&D
- Replies: 198
- Views: 34495
- Sun Aug 09, 2009 5:15 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Major Design Choices of 4e D&D
- Replies: 198
- Views: 34495
Regardless of rather anyone considers marking a big enough deal to even care about (It really amounts to about the same choice as choosing who you're going to attack IMO) the point has already been made that there REALLY aren't a sufficient number of bonus choices given in 4e's to credit it with be...
- Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:29 am
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Major Design Choices of 4e D&D
- Replies: 198
- Views: 34495
This is out and out bullshit. Cleave is optional in 3e, because every attack is optional. You don't have the choice to not get the ability to take the attack but Combat Challenge doesn't give you the choice to not have the ability to put a free Mark on the table either. So fuck off. Look on page 77...
- Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:25 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Major Design Choices of 4e D&D
- Replies: 198
- Views: 34495
- Sat Aug 08, 2009 9:38 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Major Design Choices of 4e D&D
- Replies: 198
- Views: 34495
What about an encounter power that disarms? I think there's only one in existence, and that's a level 17 fighter exploit. But it also deals damage. How is that different from claiming that Cleave is not an option when you are fighting a Solo or Reaping Strike is not an option when you are fighting ...
- Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:50 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Major Design Choices of 4e D&D
- Replies: 198
- Views: 34495
Actually, encounter powers are an option exactly once per encounter. Every round except that round, they are not options. The same applies to dailies; they are only an option for one round a day. So, while in the first round of combat a day, the 4E fighter has an advantage, in the fourth round he d...
- Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:58 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Major Design Choices of 4e D&D
- Replies: 198
- Views: 34495
May not always be a use able option but they are always on the table. Using encounters and dailies aren't always an option but they are included so why not disarms and sunders? True you can never have a fighter without race but unlike 4e which has limits to what race you can be 3e doesn't have any ...
- Sat Aug 08, 2009 7:31 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Major Design Choices of 4e D&D
- Replies: 198
- Views: 34495
You're never going to have a fighter without a race, though, so it should count. To make things even, just use a race out of the 3e core books with a 0 LA. Hound Archon shouldn't even be considered for this comparison. You're also forgetting that with the 3e fighter, disarm and sunder are sometimes ...
- Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:50 pm
- Forum: In My Humble Opinion...
- Topic: Major Design Choices of 4e D&D
- Replies: 198
- Views: 34495
A 3.0 Fighter can at first level Power Attack, regular attack, charge, disarm, sunder, trip, bullrush, and grapple. There are even reasons to do all of these things. A 4e Fighter can Tide of Iron, Cleave, Spinning Sweep, Comeback Strike, charge, grab, push, and regular attack. It's the same number ...