Frantic Needs to be Banned

Username17 · Post by **Username17** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:03 pm

Seriously. Posting porn with chopped up girls in it is beyond the acceptable standards of even this forum. Also, he doesn't contribute to anything except flame wars with Roy.

Get that asshole off this forum. Right now.

-Username17

virgil · Post by **virgil** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:15 pm

I'm agree. I did my usual 'open multiple tabs for new posts' routine, and then I got inundated with half a dozen of the same horrific...thing.

TavishArtair · Post by **TavishArtair** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:16 pm

I think the report on his post states that too, but in the event that he attempts to edit his post, I've taken a lovely screenshot with the imagelink still there. Actually, I've taken about 4. I can't upload them anywhere though, for kinda obvious reasons, so I can only send them to an e-mail address or something.

Lago PARANOIA · Post by **Lago PARANOIA** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 6:31 pm

Thanks for pulling this stunt on me while I was on a computer with other people around, Frantic.

I really appreciate that. Enjoy your inevitable ban.

koz · Post by **koz** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:24 pm

Yeah, definitely ban-worthy. And very sad.

Akula · Post by **Akula** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:28 pm

I'm with everyone else on this. There is no universe in which this could be considered acceptable behavior.

IGTN · Post by **IGTN** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:37 pm

I can't even remember anything else Frantic posted before that image other than in the most broad terms. He won't be missed.

violence in the media · Sun Jun 28, 2009 7:42 pm

Ummm, yeah. WTF was that about?

Cynic · Post by **Cynic** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:05 pm

Woah.... go away for several days and the world changes.

Even though I'm in an empty room. I'm too tired to think right now. So, I'll let the who uses extreme examples living in a county of porn guide my way in this blind challenge. i'll.... say no to chopped up girl porn.

Was there even a NSFW/SFW link or description next to it?

koz · Post by **koz** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 8:07 pm

A_Cynic wrote: Was there even a NSFW/SFW link or description next to it?

No. There was literally no point to that image (or rather those images) except to troll.

Bill Bisco: Isometric Imp · Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:28 pm

Hate to try to be a voice of reason here, but are we sure that Frantic purposefully put those images up there? I mean, if someone here were around longer, would you instantly ban them for that?

TavishArtair · Post by **TavishArtair** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:46 pm

Bill Bisco: Isometric Imp wrote:Hate to try to be a voice of reason here, but are we sure that Frantic purposefully put those images up there? I mean, if someone here were around longer, would you instantly ban them for that?

To the first question: Yes. You do not accidentally post the same image a half-dozen times.

To the second question: Yes. This site has posting privileges locked behind a password for a reason. If you have control of your identity here usurped you (or at least, your screen name) is still responsible for what happened. At the very least, we cannot allow the identity Frantic to continue here.

I, at least, frankly wouldn't give a damn if the person posting those images had the screen name of FrankTrollman. He should be banned, and if he wants to beg for mercy he can damn well get on his knees, but he can ask for forgiveness of the administrators from over there -> in the land of not-capable-of-posting.

Crissa · Post by **Crissa** » Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:18 pm

The solution to deliberate damage is to ban instantly, and sort it out later.

-Crissa

PhoneLobster · Post by **PhoneLobster** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 12:11 am

If action is taken I suggest you check IP logs and such if possible.

Frantic's behavior could be consistent with a puppet account or something similar.

Kaelik · Post by **Kaelik** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:05 am

Frantic is like the anti-Roy, but with everything to a more extreme. I am totally okay with banning him over that image spam being inappropriate. But I will say that it has given me new appreciation for Roy. At least he confines himself to lolcats.

shau · Post by **shau** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:31 am

Definitely needs to be banned.

Psychic Robot · Post by **Psychic Robot** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:40 am

Yes on banning.

PL wrote:If action is taken I suggest you check IP logs and such if possible.

Frantic's behavior could be consistent with a puppet account or something similar.

Yes on this.

Yugo · Post by **Yugo** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:30 am

He should be banned for spamming. I don't need to see that stuff when I'm trying to read discussions.

Username17 · Post by **Username17** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:33 am

Kaelik wrote:Frantic is like the anti-Roy, but with everything to a more extreme. I am totally okay with banning him over that image spam being inappropriate. But I will say that it has given me new appreciation for Roy. At least he confines himself to lolcats.

Yes.

-Username17

Grek · Post by **Grek** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:39 am

Frantic convinced me to forgive Eleaneser and take him off ignore. He was only mildly offensive compared to dismemberment porn.

Absentminded_Wizard · Post by **Absentminded_Wizard** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:44 am

Possibly dismemberment kiddie porn, too.

Yeah, I think whether it's Frantic's fault or not, the account needs to be banned to prevent further spamming.

Cynic · Post by **Cynic** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:27 am

So far, I'm just manually adblocked the image source er directory rather than thesite. dramatica has some fun stuff. I used to remember seeing a spider monkey script that worked in conjunction with adblock that did this automatically for forum software. I'll have to look it up. If I find it, I'll link it. I'll abstain from voting though.

Draco_Argentum · Post by **Draco_Argentum** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:07 am

FrankTrollman wrote:Seriously. Posting porn with chopped up girls in it is beyond the acceptable standards of even this forum.

Any forum where that is acceptable is seriously fucked up. Time for a banhammering.

Fuchs · Post by **Fuchs** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:16 am

Indeed.

Caedrus · Post by **Caedrus** » Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:29 am

I'll add my vote to the list. Ban Frantic.

The Gaming Den

Frantic Needs to be Banned

Frantic Needs to be Banned

Re: Frantic Needs to be Banned