Ways to add spells known to an arcane spontaneous spell list

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

ubernoob
Duke
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:30 am

Post by ubernoob »

Ganbare Gincun wrote:
Kaelik wrote:I'll give you the short version. My list of people I would murder in real life over D&D goes like this:

JaronK
Question: why do you hate JaronK? I assume that people have problems with his Tier system based on the other thread that Frank created, but is it so faulty that he deserves to be stabbed in the face? Or is JaronK engaged in some kind of ass-hattery on some other RPG forum that I am unaware of?
Try to discuss anything with him. He's a pathological liar and his favorite debate strategy is straw man (seriously I've hardly ever seen a post of his where he DOESN'T straw man who he's quoting). Here's an example:
http://brilliantgameologists.com/boards ... #msg178299

Look at his rebuttal of both Kaelik and Mister Sinister. He lies. All the fucking time. While calling other people liars. Last time I argued with him, once he figured out it was me he stopped direct quoting me so that my points wouldn't be there to look at when other people read. Fuck that guy.
User avatar
Ganbare Gincun
Duke
Posts: 1022
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:42 am

Post by Ganbare Gincun »

Well, that link sure cleared things up for me. Thanks! :lol:
Lago PARANOIA
Invincible Overlord
Posts: 10555
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am

Post by Lago PARANOIA »

Caveat: Flanking is the easiest way to get sneak attack damage in 3.5E at low levels if you're using the nerfed-as-shit hide rules where you are automatically spotted if someone has direct LoS to you.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.

In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
koz
Duke
Posts: 1585
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:39 pm
Location: Oz

Post by koz »

Lago PARANOIA wrote:Caveat: Flanking is the easiest way to get sneak attack damage in 3.5E at low levels if you're using the nerfed-as-shit hide rules where you are automatically spotted if someone has direct LoS to you.
That caveat proves nothing in this case.
Everything I learned about DnD, I learned from Frank Trollman.
Kaelik wrote:You are so full of Strawmen that I can only assume you actually shit actual straw.
souran wrote:...uber, nerd-rage-inducing, minutia-devoted, pointless blithering shit.
Schwarzkopf wrote:The Den, your one-stop shop for in-depth analysis of Dungeons & Dragons and distressingly credible threats of oral rape.
DSM wrote:Apparently, The GM's Going To Punch You in Your Goddamned Face edition of D&D is getting more traction than I expected. Well, it beats playing 4th. Probably 5th, too.
Frank Trollman wrote:Giving someone a mouth full of cock is a standard action.
PoliteNewb wrote:If size means anything, it's what position you have to get in to give a BJ.
Image
Post Reply