Most Legitimately Difficult Modules Ever?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Invincible Overlord
- Posts: 10555
- Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 3:00 am
Most Legitimately Difficult Modules Ever?
I'm trying to compile a list of them for all tabletop games. I'd prefer to leave off modules that are difficult because they directly contradict key rules elements, lack internal sense, or are difficult due to trial-and-error gameplay where avoiding grievous yet easy-to-bypass obstacles is the key to success.
Less Tomb of Horrors, more Red Hand of Doom. Please also explain why the adventure is difficult.
Less Tomb of Horrors, more Red Hand of Doom. Please also explain why the adventure is difficult.
Josh Kablack wrote:Your freedom to make rulings up on the fly is in direct conflict with my freedom to interact with an internally consistent narrative. Your freedom to run/play a game without needing to understand a complex rule system is in direct conflict with my freedom to play a character whose abilities and flaws function as I intended within that ruleset. Your freedom to add and change rules in the middle of the game is in direct conflict with my ability to understand that rules system before I decided whether or not to join your game.
In short, your entire post is dismissive of not merely my intelligence, but my agency. And I don't mean agency as a player within one of your games, I mean my agency as a person. You do not want me to be informed when I make the fundamental decisions of deciding whether to join your game or buying your rules system.
-
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 29894
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
The adventure they put out for the Wheel of Time role playing game (we don't talk about that games cool adjustments to the vancian system enough) is actually quite difficult after the first few "mini" adventures.
Although that games difficulty fluxuated in difficulty based on how much the GM pushed things towards being like the books or how they made it like D&D...
The adventure out of the boxed set for 2e forgotten realms was really actually pretty rough for a low level party. I found that even veteran players would get TPK in that dungeon.
Also 2e "ruins of myth drannor" boxed set had some adventures that my gaming group never beat. It has some dungeons that have rooms that are basically designed to kill a player and have no way to bring them back. My group at the time would spend lots of resources trying to at least get the body back for a rez and end up just saying "to hell" with the whole adventure.
I have heard people love Menzoberanzan but I have never heard anybody explain why except "drow kick ass" so I cannot vouch for the adventures.
I have heard really awesome things about "Die Vecna Die!" if played at the correct level range. I have heard really crappy things about it from people who complained the adventure should have been for 15+ instead of 10-13....
Also Die Vecna Die! has got t obe the COOLEST adventure name ever produced.
Although that games difficulty fluxuated in difficulty based on how much the GM pushed things towards being like the books or how they made it like D&D...
The adventure out of the boxed set for 2e forgotten realms was really actually pretty rough for a low level party. I found that even veteran players would get TPK in that dungeon.
Also 2e "ruins of myth drannor" boxed set had some adventures that my gaming group never beat. It has some dungeons that have rooms that are basically designed to kill a player and have no way to bring them back. My group at the time would spend lots of resources trying to at least get the body back for a rez and end up just saying "to hell" with the whole adventure.
I have heard people love Menzoberanzan but I have never heard anybody explain why except "drow kick ass" so I cannot vouch for the adventures.
I have heard really awesome things about "Die Vecna Die!" if played at the correct level range. I have heard really crappy things about it from people who complained the adventure should have been for 15+ instead of 10-13....
Also Die Vecna Die! has got t obe the COOLEST adventure name ever produced.
Last edited by souran on Wed Jun 30, 2010 9:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I had an old DnD set of modules that were titled by the monster and number of them you were facing.FrankTrollman wrote:the original Against The Giants is a meat grinder. None of the monsters are individually that threatening (Hill Giants then Troglodytes). But this was back in the days when Gygax took the Number Appearing line at face value.
Orcs: 40-400
-Username17
One of the best titles for a mod ever:
Orcs (1000)
(the mod book is sadly packed away in my parent's basement until I sell my current abode)
...Why the hell are people so scared of RHoD? And don't say 'the dragons', there are four of them. Total. Most of which are set with fucking stupid tactics.
Draco_Argentum wrote:Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
I think there are a few BS portions and the expected party is supposed to be damned low considering the CR opponents.Roy wrote:...Why the hell are people so scared of RHoD? And don't say 'the dragons', there are four of them. Total. Most of which are set with fucking stupid tactics.
That said when I played the living greyhawk adaptations the dragons usually got crushed pretty easily. Then again we had an average party level about 1-2 higher than the original mod expected (however there were 2 utterly useless characters in our party of 6 so we did not have a real advantage there). I think my character could 1-hit kill most enemies and 2 hits on the tougher baddies. That helped.
I think only the last fight sucked for us. Do not remember why it was a bad. I think a silence spell fucked us hard maybe.
I've heard this before, but don't know anything about the module besides the general plot. Could you give a few examples of the puzzles/puzzle monsters in it?Cynic wrote:Dead Gods. It's got hack n slash and rp but it's also a helluva puzzle module with puzzle monsters that took our group ages to solve.
The power of the vestige's illusions are the most brutal you'll ever see, off the top of my head. It's comparatively easy to be the wrong kind of cautious when you first enter Castle Perilous.
Come see Sprockets & Serials
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
How do you confuse a barbarian?
Put a greatsword a maul and a greataxe in a room and ask them to take their pick
EXPLOSIVE RUNES!
And most of em are like CR 1, so it doesn't matter.ubernoob wrote:Large number of enemies. Wail on the hobo tactics don't work.Roy wrote:...Why the hell are people so scared of RHoD? And don't say 'the dragons', there are four of them. Total. Most of which are set with fucking stupid tactics.
I mean really, dragons are scary and all, but not nearly as much as the Den hypes em up to be and even then, that's still only four encounters. They're also set up in such a way that the players can get a significant advantage via easy and intuitive means.
But between bad tactics and poor builds (enemy casters with LA, really?) it's not that genuinely difficult.
I've seen gimped parties blast through it on hardmode (most encounters 2-3 levels higher, and not designed to be made of fail). How gimped? They had a CW Samurai and a Warlock. Nuff said.
Draco_Argentum wrote:Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
-
- Master
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:38 pm
Rappan Athuk Reloaded has the typical 1E style dungeon where you fight fifty trolls in one room and three normal rats in the next room.
But I think the question is silly. A "legitimately" hard dungeon is hard because it has difficult challenges, and the Challenge Rating system is completely arbitrary.
But I think the question is silly. A "legitimately" hard dungeon is hard because it has difficult challenges, and the Challenge Rating system is completely arbitrary.
- Ganbare Gincun
- Duke
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 4:42 am
Yeah. And still just about every death could have been summarized as 'beatstick tries to melee a dragon, dragon shows them how it's done'.Koumei wrote:Ouch. They were playing on Nightmare difficulty then?Roy wrote:How gimped? They had a CW Samurai and a Warlock. Nuff said.
Once they learned to let the real characters handle the real threats, while they stuck to beating on things 4-7 levels lower the deaths stopped.
Draco_Argentum wrote:Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
Blasted wrote:Really? The Isle of Dread has a really terrible reputation.Ganbare Gincun wrote:My favorite old-school D&D modules are probably the Secret Of Bone Hill and The Isle Of Dread. Not necessarily the most difficult modules, but very entertaining in the right hands nevertheless.
But is it more terribad than the Temple of Orcus? The dungeon was possibly the most retarded ever. One of the rooms was a giant room with the Tarrasque just waiting in it.
Last edited by erik on Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Duke
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 8:33 am
I realize it's completely tangental, but this reminds me of Architect player-made missions in City of Heroes. You get actual attempts to make interesting adventures and story arcs, or you get completely mindless grinds titled things like "Rikti farm".erik wrote: I had an old DnD set of modules that were titled by the monster and number of them you were facing.
One of the best titles for a mod ever:
Orcs (1000)
(the mod book is sadly packed away in my parent's basement until I sell my current abode)
- bosssmiley
- Apprentice
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 7:56 pm
WG4 - Forbidden Temple of Thurizdan.
It's a module that requires careful reading and thought by the DM, and a sense of genre-savvy wariness on the part of the exploring party.
It also deviates radically from the trad. "kill the monster, take its pie" model of D&D dungeoneering in that there are few wandering monsters, and in that most of the sweetest lewt is in the form of one hard-to-obtain big score.
There are puzzles in the module with scattered and subtle contextual clues and no set explanation, but they still aren't dick-move "hah! You're dead" stunts (like you get in the Tomb of Horrors): everything makes sense in the context.
It's a module that requires careful reading and thought by the DM, and a sense of genre-savvy wariness on the part of the exploring party.
It also deviates radically from the trad. "kill the monster, take its pie" model of D&D dungeoneering in that there are few wandering monsters, and in that most of the sweetest lewt is in the form of one hard-to-obtain big score.
There are puzzles in the module with scattered and subtle contextual clues and no set explanation, but they still aren't dick-move "hah! You're dead" stunts (like you get in the Tomb of Horrors): everything makes sense in the context.
Last edited by bosssmiley on Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:28 am, edited 2 times in total.
The rules serve the game, not vice versa.
-
- Prince
- Posts: 2606
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:43 pm
Most difficult module EVAR?
Simple. Paranoia's Das Bot mission.
In 20+ years, almost nobody has ever finished it. At the time of it's reprinting, not one single person who had played the story had ever finished it officially.
Granted, there is an entire scene in a sub which results in a more or less 100% TPK rate, since in some situations you only have 3 real-world seconds to actually fix the screw up you just committed.
One of my favorite difficult modules is still Paranoia, and is Me and My Shadow Mark IV.
"And then something falls off..."
Simple. Paranoia's Das Bot mission.
In 20+ years, almost nobody has ever finished it. At the time of it's reprinting, not one single person who had played the story had ever finished it officially.
Granted, there is an entire scene in a sub which results in a more or less 100% TPK rate, since in some situations you only have 3 real-world seconds to actually fix the screw up you just committed.
One of my favorite difficult modules is still Paranoia, and is Me and My Shadow Mark IV.
"And then something falls off..."
- RobbyPants
- King
- Posts: 5202
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm