Pathfinder: the Lowdown

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

Locked
Koumei
Serious Badass
Posts: 13970
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: South Ausfailia

Post by Koumei »

Roy wrote: So where is the person using those words?
I don't know, I don't go there. For the same reason I don't stick my hand in wasp nests. But apparently there is someone there who uses the same phrases as you, enough to convince them you are there. I'm surprised anyone even cares. "Oh noes, some guy on the Internet is over here, saying mean things to me!"
Count Arioch the 28th wrote:There is NOTHING better than lesbians. Lesbians make everything better.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

Koumei wrote:
Roy wrote: So where is the person using those words?
I don't know, I don't go there. For the same reason I don't stick my hand in wasp nests. But apparently there is someone there who uses the same phrases as you, enough to convince them you are there. I'm surprised anyone even cares. "Oh noes, some guy on the Internet is over here, saying mean things to me!"
More like a nest of sugar ants than a wasp nest.

The Paizils care because their minds break if people aren't 'civil' to them. I'm not sure why people here are getting aboard the run from Royzilla boat. I will say this though. Successful Shadow Troll is Successful.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
FatR
Duke
Posts: 1221
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:36 am

Post by FatR »

Koumei wrote: I don't know, I don't go there. For the same reason I don't stick my hand in wasp nests. But apparently there is someone there who uses the same phrases as you, enough to convince them you are there. I'm surprised anyone even cares. "Oh noes, some guy on the Internet is over here, saying mean things to me!"
Well, I care a bit when people say blatant lies on TGD, even if they have degenerated to local village idiots long ago.
User avatar
Psychic Robot
Prince
Posts: 4607
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by Psychic Robot »

I think people think that Mistah Green is Roy. He certainly sounds like him in some ways.
Count Arioch wrote:I'm not sure how discussions on whether PR is a terrible person or not is on-topic.
Ant wrote:
Chamomile wrote:Ant, what do we do about Psychic Robot?
You do not seem to do anything.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

Psychic Robot wrote:I think people think that Mistah Green is Roy. He certainly sounds like him in some ways.
Which is the best part. If you're going to accuse people of being me, pick someone meaner. Enchanter Tom for example. Or that fucker who originally started with the failden comments.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
User avatar
RobbyPants
King
Posts: 5202
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm

Post by RobbyPants »

That's a really funny coincidence, since you use the Mr. Green smiley all the time here (or at least you use too).
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

RobbyPants wrote:That's a really funny coincidence, since you use the Mr. Green smiley all the time here (or at least you use too).
This? :mrgreen:
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
User avatar
RobbyPants
King
Posts: 5202
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm

Post by RobbyPants »

That's the one.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

RobbyPants wrote:That's the one.
So far we have a generic smiley and a term used by many different people. Does anyone else have any stellar and irrefutable evidence they would like to contribute?

I'd think people would at least try and make it plausible by picking a poster on the Paizo boards who actually is mean and aggressive.

I'll even give you some names.

Enchanter Tom.
cfalcon.
james maissen.

Of course if you'd rather simply continue entertaining me with outlandish accusations, I'm cool with that.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
User avatar
RobbyPants
King
Posts: 5202
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm

Post by RobbyPants »

Roy wrote:So far we have a generic smiley and a term used by many different people. Does anyone else have any stellar and irrefutable evidence they would like to contribute?
If by stellar and irrefutable evidence, you mean "coincidence", like, you know, what I said two posts ago.

You're reading too much into it.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

RobbyPants wrote:
Roy wrote:So far we have a generic smiley and a term used by many different people. Does anyone else have any stellar and irrefutable evidence they would like to contribute?
If by stellar and irrefutable evidence, you mean "coincidence", like, you know, what I said two posts ago.

You're reading too much into it.
Or I was being a sarcastic ass and having fun with it. Like, you know, what I've been saying the entire time.

Why so serious?
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
User avatar
erik
King
Posts: 5868
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by erik »

Roy wrote:Or I was being a sarcastic ass and having fun with it. Like, you know, what I've been saying the entire time.
Image
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

erik wrote:
Roy wrote:Or I was being a sarcastic ass and having fun with it. Like, you know, what I've been saying the entire time.
Image
You said it, not me.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
User avatar
RobbyPants
King
Posts: 5202
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm

Post by RobbyPants »

Roy wrote:
RobbyPants wrote:
Roy wrote:So far we have a generic smiley and a term used by many different people. Does anyone else have any stellar and irrefutable evidence they would like to contribute?
If by stellar and irrefutable evidence, you mean "coincidence", like, you know, what I said two posts ago.

You're reading too much into it.
Or I was being a sarcastic ass and having fun with it. Like, you know, what I've been saying the entire time.

Why so serious?
Oh. I'm reading too much into it. Carry on, then. :p


Edit:
On an earlier topic, I noticed the TV Trope has been edited several times to take on a more... neutral stance. I had no idea how many people read the Pathfinder trope. Several of those edits were in a really short period of time.
Last edited by RobbyPants on Mon Oct 04, 2010 7:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Xur
Apprentice
Posts: 87
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:15 pm

Post by Xur »

RobbyPants wrote: On an earlier topic, I noticed the TV Trope has been edited several times to take on a more... neutral stance. I had no idea how many people read the Pathfinder trope. Several of those edits were in a really short period of time.
Sounds like 4E to me :D
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

RobbyPants wrote:
Roy wrote:
RobbyPants wrote:If by stellar and irrefutable evidence, you mean "coincidence", like, you know, what I said two posts ago.

You're reading too much into it.
Or I was being a sarcastic ass and having fun with it. Like, you know, what I've been saying the entire time.

Why so serious?
Oh. I'm reading too much into it. Carry on, then. :p


Edit:
On an earlier topic, I noticed the TV Trope has been edited several times to take on a more... neutral stance. I had no idea how many people read the Pathfinder trope. Several of those edits were in a really short period of time.
Oh, don't ya know? The Paizils lurk this forum because they hang on my every word. Hi Paizils.

Try it. Edit the page and post here saying you've done so. Then wait for it.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
Kaiyanwang
NPC
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Italy

Post by Kaiyanwang »

Roy wrote: Hi Paizils.
Hi Roy! How do you do?
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

Kaiyanwang wrote:
Roy wrote: Hi Paizils.
Hi Roy! How do you do?
See, works like a charm.

Are you having fun over there? I'm having fun watching the trainwreck going on.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
Kaiyanwang
NPC
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Italy

Post by Kaiyanwang »

Roy wrote:
Kaiyanwang wrote:
Roy wrote: Hi Paizils.
Hi Roy! How do you do?
See, works like a charm.

Are you having fun over there? I'm having fun watching the trainwreck going on.
I couldn't resist.. but I'm not having fun, nor I want to troll you Roy. :mrgreen:

I don't even disagree on everything with MG, by I find his way of interact with people and his absolute statements extremely annoying.

I don't understand if he's a troll or simply a sociopath. His "obvious" statements about wizardfortitude saves are made of pure fun. Shame on me on taking him seriously at the beginning.
Roy
Prince
Posts: 2772
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 9:53 pm

Post by Roy »

Kaiyanwang wrote:
Roy wrote:
Kaiyanwang wrote:
Hi Roy! How do you do?
See, works like a charm.

Are you having fun over there? I'm having fun watching the trainwreck going on.
I couldn't resist.. but I'm not having fun, nor I want to troll you Roy. :mrgreen:

I don't even disagree on everything with MG, by I find his way of interact with people and his absolute statements extremely annoying.

I don't understand if he's a troll or simply a sociopath. His "obvious" statements about wizardfortitude saves are made of pure fun. Shame on me on taking him seriously at the beginning.
Here at the Den, we're totally ok with telling someone to fuck themselves and suck a barrel of cocks. But when you insult someone, you have to back it up. Someone is a troll or a sociopath because you don't believe them? That's a Giant Fucking Frog moment right there. And by Giant Fucking Frog I mean Slaadi.

For that matter, so is assuming anyone sufficiently skilled at optimization posts here. There are other CharOp boards. WotC, BG being the biggest ones.

If you hang around here long enough, you'll realize any optimizers that venture into the Tea Party headquarters are being very nice compared to us. Both in terms of actually being nice, and in terms of conservative optimization.

*casts Summon Justice Eagle*

You might want to lie down. You might just fall into a coma once he shows up.
Draco_Argentum wrote:
Mister_Sinister wrote:Clearly, your cock is part of the big barrel the server's busy sucking on.
Can someone tell it to stop using its teeth please?
Juton wrote:Damn, I thought [Pathfailure] accidentally created a feat worth taking, my mistake.
Koumei wrote:Shad, please just punch yourself in the face until you are too dizzy to type. I would greatly appreciate that.
Kaelik wrote:No, bad liar. Stop lying.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type I - doing exactly the opposite of what they said they would do.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type II - change for the sake of change.
Standard Paizil Fare/Fail (SPF) Type III - the illusion of change.
ubernoob
Duke
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:30 am

Post by ubernoob »

I think it's totally fair to call Roy a sociopath. Or at least the persona he displays online.
Kaiyanwang
NPC
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Italy

Post by Kaiyanwang »

Roy wrote: If you hang around here long enough, you'll realize any optimizers that venture into the Tea Party headquarters are being very nice compared to us. Both in terms of actually being nice, and in terms of conservative optimization.
:confused: does not seem to me that, say, K had such condiscending behaviour when posting on paizo board. Is not a matter of being optimizer, IMO.

Said this, I lurked here a lot of time (I didn't logged to troll you, but to clarify a thing with K because a discussion we had on paizo board disappeared, later we discovered temporarily) because in GiTP someone linked this place for tomes (discussion about how feats should scale).

I don't have the point of view of most of the denners but IMO people with different takes are the ones you must hear to see things in a more complete manner. I don't start about behaviour because I dont' want to tell people how behave when I'm an "guest" if you understand me.

This, and thank you all for a certain "millions of" Thread. I want to be buried with the printed version of it. AHAHAHATITANIUMDRAGON. AHah.


Se you Roy :tongue:
Last edited by Kaiyanwang on Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kaelik
ArchDemon of Rage
Posts: 15049
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by Kaelik »

No that other guys who has my mannerisms and uses my phrases is not me, no sir not at all.

But don't you dare insult him. HARGARADSAS! He's such a great guy!
Unrestricted Diplomat 5314 wrote:Accept this truth, as the wisdom of the Crafted: when the oppressors and abusers have won, when the boot of the callous has already trampled you flat, you should always, always take your swing."
User avatar
erik
King
Posts: 5868
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Post by erik »

ubernoob wrote:I think it's totally fair to call Roy a sociopath. Or at least the persona he displays online.
I think that's not being fair to sociopaths. :hugefrown:
ubernoob
Duke
Posts: 2444
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 12:30 am

Post by ubernoob »

erik wrote:
ubernoob wrote:I think it's totally fair to call Roy a sociopath. Or at least the persona he displays online.
I think that's not being fair to sociopaths. :hugefrown:
Good point.
Locked